Active clinical trials for "Rectal Neoplasms"

DESIGN: Randomized, open-label and parallel clinical trial, assigned to early, mid, or late withdrawal of urinary catheter with a 1: 1: 1 allocation ratio. POPULATION: Patients undergoing anterior rectal resection, low rectal resection, or abdominoperineal amputation for any reason. OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to compare the incidence of acute urine retention after removal of the urinary catheter in the postoperative period of rectal resection. Secondary objectives are: Incidence of urinary tract infection after urinary catheter removal. Incidence of specific postoperative complications (Surgical wound infection, Respiratory infection, Anastomotic dehiscence, ileus). Incidence of postoperative complications assessed according to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scale. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVENTION: In all patients, a Rectal Resection (anterior rectal resection, posterior pelvic exenteration or abdominoperineal amputation) will be performed. In group 1A, the urinary catheter will be removed on the 1st postoperative day. In group 1B patients, the urinary catheter will be removed on the 3rd postoperative day. In group 1C patients, the urinary catheter will be removed on the 5th postoperative day. All patients will have a urine culture taken at the time of withdrawal.

This study is to investigate the role of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) on the postoperative recovery of rectal cancer patients.

The present study aimed to review the characteristics and outcome of early-onset rectal cancer in a subset of Egyptian patients aged 40 years or less. Since the previous studies assessed this point of research in CRC overall, the investigators opted to focus upon rectal cancer alone since it may represent a separate category, distinct from colon cancer, in this age group with regards to presentation, tumor behavior, and outcome.

Even after adequate TME with grade III mesorectal grading, local recurrence remains a possible event. Several studies investigated different parameters and assessed their predictive power in regards to local recurrence after TME. These parameters included a variety of patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors. A recent meta-analysis reviewed the current literature for the predictors of local recurrence after TME for rectal cancer and developed a prognostic scoring system, the PREDICT score. The present study aimed to validate the PREDICT scoring system by applying it to a prospective cohort of patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative TME in three

Exploration of the experiences and needs of patients with the low anterior resection syndrome, their informal caregiver and health care professionals. This is a qualitative study where semi-structured interviews will be conducted with patients and informal caregivers. next to that focus groups will be performed with healthcare professionals from different professions.

This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of an USPIO contrast agent (ferumoxtran-10) in combination with 7 Tesla MRI to detect lymph node metastases in rectal and breast cancer.

Lymph node status is of major prognostic importance in non-metastatic rectal cancer. For oncological reasons, central arterial ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is suggested. However, there is no conclusive evidence presented for this procedure. This study aimed at investigating the localisation of lymph node metastases and the role of central versus peripheral arterial ligation of in rectal cancer specimens.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is considered the commonest major complication after surgery for rectal cancer. Transanal tube drainage role in the prevention of AL is still debatable.

This study plans to construct a MR radiomics model for predicting pathological complete response(pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC) patients.

Elaboration of a preoperative prediction model of the quality of the mesorectum and the involvement of the circumferential margin in patients with mid-low rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic anterior rectal resection. In a second phase the investigators will study the utility of the prediction model in classifying patients with high risk of suboptimal quality of mesorectum and/or positive circumferential margin. Patients with high preoperative risk will undergo a transanal total mesorectal excision and patients with low risk a laparoscopic transabdominal mesorectal excision. The investigators finally will compare pathological outcomes ( quality of mesorectum and circumferential margin), survival and recurrence between the two groups.