Active clinical trials for "Rectal Neoplasms"

The outcomes of patients who undergo radical surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer have improved vastly, but there is a lack of emphasis on the quality-of-life outcomes of these patients. This study will assess the patient experience of having a stoma for urinary diversion as part of surgery for advanced pelvic malignancy. This will be assessed at regular intervals both before and after surgery with the goal of increasing awareness of patient beliefs and concerns with regards to their stomas and to devise interventions that will improve their quality-of-life.

This is a retrospective study using images acquired routinely for diagnosis of rectal cancer to see if these could be used to predict responses to radiotherapy treatment and if it can, whether the treatment can be optimised to produce better outcome for patients. Using a clinical database, patients who have had neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy will be recruited, their diagnostic images and radiotherapy planning scan will be obtained. By use of imaging registration and clinical information, the question of why some patients respond well to radiotherapy and some don't could be answered.

We collect prospectively and retrospectively, patients' demographic, pathological, surgical, therapeutic and prognosis informations in a database. After patient's consent to collect tumoural samples of their colorectal cancer after resection. We will then be able to evaluate the impact of HSP110, a chaperon protein, on their prognosis. Other proteins (to be determined) will also be study, after.

The formation of a colostomy following surgery for rectal cancer changes body image, challenges patient practical skills and threatens quality of life. As the oncological results have improved over the last decades the number of survivors from rectal cancer who have to adjust to a cancer free life in their own homes is increasing. To enable the identification of the patients with stoma-related reduced health-related Quality of life (HRQoL) in a quick and reliable way we recently developed the Colostomy Impact Score (CI-score) comprising 7 items of stoma related factors with significant impact on HRQoL. The purpose of the present project is to perform an international validation of the CI-score and to demonstrate its applicability. The construct validity of the CI-score will be studied internationally on crosssectional cohorts of patients with permanent colostomy after abdominoperineal excision (APE) or Hartmann's procedure in Denmark, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Turkey, Brazil, Egypt, Russia, Lithuania, Israel, Portugal, South Africa, Australia and China. This will be done by testing the CI-score against five anchor questions stoma impact on HRQoL, the 5 Level version og the EuroQol measuer (EQ-5D-5L) and version 3.0 of the Quality of Life Questionnaire from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire v3.0). The impact of the challenges related to having a stoma may vary with different demographic, socioeconomic and cultural factors. Supplementary data on stoma care, demographics and socioeconomic status will be gathered to study the impact of patient-related factors and cultural differences on HRQoL in rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy.

The aim of this study is to decrease the morbidity by 30% using the Turnbull-Cutait procedure in comparison to the standard surgery for low rectal cancer. The investigators compare quality of life, faecal incontinence and recurrence of neoplasm in patients who received standard colo-anal anastomosis with protective ileostomy or two-staged Turnbull-Cutait colo-anal anastomosis after Low Anterior Resection for rectal cancer.

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard procedure for treating rectal cancer. However, in patients with obesity, prostate hypertrophy, low located tumor or/and pelvic stenosis, the traditional laparoscopic or open surgery is not easy to conduct. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) might serve as a better procedure for these patients, for it might ease the dissection of the low mesorectum. So far, several studies have showed the promising results of TaTME, but the multi-center data in China is still lacking. This nationwide registry study included more than 30 Chinese hospitals, aiming at obtaining data on the safety and efficacy of this procedure in Chinese patients with rectal cancer and encouraging future research in this field.

14,000 new cases of rectal cancer are diagnosed each year, frail and elderly patients represent a rising proportion of these patients. Whilst the gold standard is often to remove the tumour and restore bowel continuity, surgeons will often avoid this procedure in this group of patients as they unfortunately tolerate surgical complications very poorly. Such surgical complications may present with life threatening sepsis, can prolong hospital stay, delay further cancer therapy and in the elderly or frail patient often leads to loss of independence and quality of life. In this setting, there are two alternative procedures (Hartmann's procedure OR intersphincteric APE) that may be used and these are employed in roughly equal measure in the UK (nationwide survey, Dec 2013, unpublished data). It is anecdotally felt that Hartmann's procedure (HP) has a greater risk of surgical complications (30%) and a few small retrospective studies have shown this (1-3), however there are no prospective data to support this view. Whilst some surgeons do choose intersphincteric APE (IAPE) on the basis of a lower surgical complication rate, many do not due to perceived limitations in the technique (longer operating time, risk of tumour perforation), which are unproven. We feel that a larger, prospective dataset is required to demonstrate the superiority of IAPE over HP and convince the remaining surgeons to change procedure. We have explored the possibility of a full randomised trial to answer this question, however this is not feasible due to the difficulty of randomisation of patients. Very little data are available regarding the use of IAPE in the setting of rectal cancer, however many surgeons who do employ the technique, specifically adapt their technique in this setting to reduce the chances of tumour perforation (two stage, stapling off rectum before removing anal canal separately). It is possible that those surgeons who prefer HP have not considered this, and combined with the lack of prospective data are reluctant to change technique. We are confident that if we can demonstrate a significant difference in surgical complication rate and promote a modification to the IAPE surgical technique then we can significantly reduce surgical harm to these frail patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether cylindrical abdominoperineal resection is effective in the treatment of advanced very low rectal cancer

Patients with sphincter saving procedures of rectal cancer usually experience intestinal dysfunction, including difficulty emptying the bowel and faecal incontinence, leading to a detriment in the quality of life. A prospective study is proposed to measure de feasibility and the impact of a continuous care programme for the prevention or reduction of intestinal dysfunction disorders. The intervention lies on prehabilitation and rehabilitation with physiotherapy, biofeedback and neuromodulation, is assisted by a telematic information system (APP for the monitoring of education on physiotherapy and surveillance).

This study suggested an effective application of pattern recognition, which figured the possible biological function of potential bio-markers of rectal cancer found in our study based on their chemical structures. Hence, this study identified the precursor protein and metabolic mechanism of these bio-markers and may contribute to the neoadjuvant chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer