Active clinical trials for "Renal Insufficiency"

Evaluation of Renal Protection Of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam As a Sedative For Septic Patients In Intensive Care Unit

The investigators designed an observational multicenter explorative in vivo study to investigate the changes in ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in blood and ascites. The investigators will include a total of 20 patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to the ward of participating hospitals. Patients are eligible when receiving ceftriaxone and concomitantly receive paracentesis. The investigators will collect all available waste blood samples of each participant, starting from study entry up until 48 hours after the last dosing interval of ceftriaxone. The investigators will collect all available waste ascites samples of each participant up until 48 hours after the last dosing interval of ceftriaxone. Duration of the trial: The study duration is variable and depends on the duration of ceftriaxone treatment and duration of hospital admission, which both are determined by the treating physician and is not influenced by study participation. Patients will be eligible for study inclusion when patients received (a single dose of) ceftriaxone treatment and undergo paracentesis during ceftriaxone treatment. The study will end 48 hours after the last dosing interval of ceftriaxone or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first. Study timeline: The investigators expect to enrol 1-2 participants every month. The total enrolment time will thus be approximately 12 months.

Patients with chronic kidney disease receiving hemodialysis (HD) suffer from higher rates of brain vascular disease and decreased cognition than the general population. One way to assess brain vascular health and response to HD stress, is to test how the brain's blood flow responds to carbon dioxide (CO2) to measure Cerebrovascular Reactivity (CVR). In this study, the investigators will compare the magnitude and speed of the brain's blood flow response to a step-wise change in CO2 with hemodynamic, dialysis, and cognitive parameters. The goal of the study is to establish therapeutic targets that can be altered during the dialysis procedure to protect the brain from HD stress.

This is an investigator-initiated (IIS), phase 2, prospective, open-label, multinational study, designed to be conducted in approximately 14 sites. Eligible patients will initially receive six 28-day cycles of isatuximab, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone. Following this phase: Patients who achieve ≥VGPR will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive isatuximab, given either Q2W or once monthly, plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Patients with <VGPR will continue treatment with isatuximab Q2W, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone. The study will last for 42 months (recruitment and follow-up period), starting from the date of the first patient in (FPI) to the date of the last patient last visit (LPLV). Core study procedures consist of baseline and post-baseline safety and disease evaluations, including physical examination, hematologic/clinical chemistry tests, radiologic assessments, bone marrow evaluations, and blood/urine M-protein assessments. Patients will be allowed to continue treatment until disease progression, death, unacceptable AEs, lost to follow-up, or consent withdrawal.

Recent studies of paclitaxel DCB in the treatment of stenosis at dialysis vascular access have shown promising results. Paclitaxel, an anti-proliferation drug, is released during balloon inflation and potentially improve primary patency by slowing down NIH effect. However, meta-analysis have suggested that the use of paclitaxel in lower limbs have increased risk of death in patients. The effect of paclitaxel DCB on dialysis access however remains unknown. Hence, we aim to set up a database to track long-term treatment outcomes of patients treated with Paclitaxel DCB at SGH for their stenosed dialysis access

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of MK-2060 (a monoclonal antibody against Factor XI) in end stage renal disease (ESRD) participants receiving hemodialysis via an arteriovenous graft (AVG). Data from this study will be used to aid dose selection of MK-2060 in future studies. The primary hypothesis is that at least one of the MK-2060 doses is superior to placebo in increasing the time to first occurrence of AVG event.

A central goal of this data repository is to collect data from a large population of subjects with a variety of renal disease states. Cohorts will include subjects with diabetes, inflammatory/autoimmune and transplant related renal conditions. Additionally, the repository will have the capacity to store biospecimens and electronic data in control subjects without established renal disease. This initiative will provide an opportunity to compare data from various disease states and controls with the objective of determining clinical and biological factors that predict disease progression, response to therapy and identify discriminating noninvasive clinical and biological features that predict renal biopsy findings.

The APOLLO study is being done in an attempt to improve outcomes after kidney transplantation and to improve the safety of living kidney donation based upon variation in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1). Genes control what is inherited from a family, such as eye color or blood type. Variation in APOL1 can cause kidney disease. African Americans, Afro-Caribbeans, Hispanic Blacks, and Africans are more likely to have the APOL1 gene variants that cause kidney disease. APOLLO will test DNA from kidney donors and recipients of kidney transplants for APOL1 to determine effects on kidney transplant-related outcomes.

To determine the safety and efficacy of Amniotic and Umbilical Cord Tissue for the treatment of the following condition categories: Orthopedic, Neurologic, Urologic, Autoimmune, Renal, Cardiac and Pulmonary Conditions. The hypotheses are that the treatments are not only extremely safe, but also statistically beneficial for all conditions. Outcomes will be determined by numerous valid outcome instruments that compile general quality of life information along with condition-specific information as well.

This study used a single-dose, open design to compare the pharmacokinetics of subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease and subjects with normal renal function.