Active clinical trials for "Infertility"

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical outcomes using different cetrorelix acetate in the context of a GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI) treatment.The main question it aims to answer is whether the biosimilar cetrorelix acetate is non-inferior to the reference product in the GnRH antagonist based protocol for women undergoing IVF. Ovarian stimulation was achieved by several types of follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH) or by FSH combined with luteinizing hormone activity. Daily dose of biosimilar cetrorelix acetate (0.25 mg SC) or original cetrorelix acetate (0.25 mg SC) will be administered when the lead follicle was 14 mm. When more than two follicles reached 17 mm, oocyte maturation was triggered with 250 mcg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin.

In traditional assisted reproductive technology (ART), choosing multiple embryo transfer to get a high clinical pregnancy rate while increasing the risk of multiple pregnancies. Research showed that the single-cleavage embryo transfer could not simultaneously meet the dual requirements of maintaining pregnancy rate and reducing the multiple pregnancy rate.The purpose of this study was to observe the clinical outcome between double cleavage embryo transfers and single blastocyst transfers in fresh cycle through RCT study with GnRH antagonist protocol.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare frozen embryo transfer protocols in patients undergoing a second frozen embryo transfer (FET) after a unsuccessful first programmed FET cycle as a possible treatment for people undergoing infertility treatment. The purpose of this research study is to: Determine if there is a difference between FET protocols in patients who require a second FET cycle. Investigate if switching the FET protocol after a failed programmed cycle is beneficial for patients undergoing a second FET cycle. Examine pregnancy outcomes including obstetrical and neonatal outcomes (if applicable) Obtain uterine flexibility/stiffness measurements via transvaginal ultrasound prior to the embryo transfer procedure. This is called shear wave elastography. Participants will be randomized in their second FET transfer attempt to either another programmed protocol or a modified natural protocol.

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic disease, characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue, glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. Although endometriosis is classified in four stage (minimal, mild, moderate, severe), from the clinical point of view it is possible to subdivide among peritoneal superficial lesions, ovarian endometriomas and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE). According to the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline on the management of women with endometriosis, it is recommended to clinicians that in infertile women with endometrioma larger than 3 cm, cystectomy should be considered prior to Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) to improve endometriosis-associated pain or the accessibility of follicles. They further recommend that clinicians counsel women with endometrioma regarding the risks of reduced ovarian function after surgery, the possible loss of the ovary, and consider that the decision to proceed with surgery should be taken carefully if the woman has had previous ovarian surgery. In addition, this Guideline suggests that clinicians can prescribe prolonged (3-6 months) pituitary downregulation with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone-agonists (GnRH-a) prior to ART, in order to increase live birth rate by four-fold. Despite these recommendations, to date there is not robust evidence to choose between the two strategies prior to ART in order to improve reproductive outcomes. For this reason, the aim of the current study will be to compare reproductive outcomes in infertile women affected by ovarian endometrioma, undergoing laparoscopic enucleation or prolonged pituitary downregulation with GnRH-a, prior to ART.

Our study will explore the feasibility of initiating a deceased donor uterine transplant program in addition to the existing living donor IRB at BWH. Using the template established by teams around the world, we will identify emotionally and socially stable females of reproductive age with intact ovaries who are unable to gestate a child due to congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. After careful screening, participants will undergo egg harvest, in vitro fertilization, and embryo cryopreservation using standard methods. Women who successfully complete the fertilization of at least six euploid embryos will be eligible to be placed on the waitlist for a deceased donor uterus transplant. After a successful transplant and a period of observation to ensure normal menstrual cycle and graft viability (anticipate six months), embryo implantation will be undertaken. Following an embryo transfer, gestation will be carefully monitored by our high-risk pregnancy specialists. Medical research interventions include the surgical implantation of a uterus utilizing techniques by teams that have applied this approach successfully, close post-transplant follow up including immunosuppression therapy tailored to established standards during pregnancy minimizing fetal risks, and careful management of pregnancy. After childbearing is complete (at most two gestations), the donor uterus will be removed either during Cesarean or during an elective procedure. In addition, open ended interviews and surveys will be conducted to elicit ethical and psychosocial concerns arising from the experience of subjects and their families, health care providers, and the wider community. The investigator's intent is to monitor outcomes for transplant recipients as well as the live born infants for 30 days after removal of the transplanted uterus. It is estimated that the time from screening to a potential live birth will be a minimum of 22 months, but likely between 24 - 36 months depending on organ availability.

To compare the difference in cumulative live birth rates between dual ovarian stimulation and two antagonist stimulations in poor ovarian responders.

this study is designed to compare the Progesterone primed ovarian stimulation protocol versus the antagonist protocol as a method to stimulate PCO patients in ICSI cycles to decrease cost and decrease OHSS.

Rationale Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is the treatment of first choice for couples with unexplained and mild male factor infertility in many countries, but it is controversial whether ovarian stimulation improves fertility outcomes. In recent retrospectively collected data, we found that in couples with unexplained and mild male factor infertility undergoing IUI, ovarian stimulation with letrozole increased live birth rate as compared to natural cycle IUI without substantially increasing the multiple pregnancy rate. We therefore intend to perform a randomized clinical trial (RCT) on the subject in five reproductive medical centers in different cities in China. Objective To test the hypothesis that in couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility scheduled for an IUI program ovarian stimulation with letrozole increases the live birth rate as compared to natural cycle treatment. Study design Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Study population Women diagnosed with unexplained or mild male factor infertility scheduled for treatment with IUI. Intervention Women will be randomized for ovarian stimulation with letrozole or to natural cycle IUI. In the group allocated to ovarian stimulation, women will receive oral tablets letrozole 5 mg daily from cycle day 3 for 5 days. We will treat the couples for 3 cycles, with a time horizon of 4 months. Main study parameters/endpoints Primary outcome is live birth resulting from conception within 4 months after randomization. Secondary endpoints are clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage rates, pregnancy complications, time to pregnancy leading to live birth. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness The strategies compared are already broadly applied in current practice. No additional risks are expected. There is no benefit for participants, but the results may benefit future infertile couples.

The aim of the study is to compare the pregnancy outcomes of single vs double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in couples with male factor infertility.

Infertile patients attending IVF treatment at the Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, Queen Mary Hospital and Kwong Wah Hospital will be recruited during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Subsequently, they will be randomly assigned on the day of oocyte retrieval by a laboratory staff into one of the following two groups: (1) the microfluidic chip group and (2) the density gradient group for sperm preparation and subsequent use in fertilization. Other IVF procedures will be the same as our usual practice. Both patients and clinicians were blinded from the group allocation i.e. a double blind study. The primary outcome is the cumulative live birth rate defined as the number of pregnancies leading to live birth within 6 months of randomisation.