Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn"

Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates has traditionally been limited to between 5-8 cmH2O. In recent years, use of CPAP pressures ≥9 cmH2O is becoming more common in neonates with evolving chronic lung disease, in lieu of other non-invasive modes or invasive mechanical ventilation. A particular knowledge gap in the current literature is the choice of the level of pressure level when using High CPAP as a post-extubation support mode. In this study, we will comparatively evaluate the short-term impact of two different high CPAP pressures when used as a post-extubation support mode in preterm neonates.

In adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the beneficial effects of prone position (PP) have been well investigated and explored; it reduces intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) and enhances lung recruitment, modifying both lung ventilation (VA) and lung perfusion (Q) distribution, finally generating an improvement in VA/Q matching and reversing oxygenation impairment;it reduces right ventricular afterload, increase cardiac index in subjects with preload reserve and reverse acute cor pulmonale in severe ARDS patients, but in infants and children there is still a lack of clear evidence. Taken together, these effects explain why PP improves oxygenation, limits the occurrence of ventilator-induced lung injury and improves survival. Prone position is simple to perform in infants and in some neonatal and pediatric intensive care units is already commonly accomplished. However, a detailed analysis of the respective effects of high PEEP and prone position is lacking in infants/children with ARDS, while these two tools may interfere and/or act coherently. A recent multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) describes how patients managed with lower PEEP relative to FIO2 than recommended by the ARDSNet model had higher mortality, suggesting that future clinical trials targeting PEEP management in PARDS are needed. We designed a physiological study to investigate the physiological effects of prone positioning on lung recruitability in infants/children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

The cases of COVID-19 are continuing to be confirmed around the world. In the clinical settings, the nurses in evacuation acute wards are main responsibility to undertake the care of emergency patient follow-up and suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases. Those nurses have to face the high psychological pressure, unknown panic, fear and so on. Thus, the study plans to invite nurses who are working in evacuation acute wards to participate the project called "Remote Psychological Support Group (RPSG)". The study supposes "RPSG" could improve nurses' self-efficacy, fear of COVID-19, psychological distress, and quality of life.

Premature babies often need help breathing for a longer period of time. Traditionally, this is done with a breathing aid called NCPAP (nasal continuous positive airway pressure). This treatment is safe and effective, but it is very time-consuming and can sometimes have side effects. In the present research project, the investigators want to find out whether another type of breathing aid called NHF (nasal high flow therapy) is just as effective for stable premature babies. The investigators suspect that NHF is just as effective, but easier to use and more comfortable.

To investigate whether nasal high frequency oscillation ventilation (nHFOV) immediately after extubation reduces the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2) at 72 hours after extubation in comparison with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in very low birth weight infants (VLBWs).

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome COronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) is a new and recognized infectious disease of the respiratory tract. Most cases are mild or asymptomatic. However, around 5% of all patients develop Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), which is the leading mortality cause in these patients. Corticosteroids have been tested in deferent scenarios of ARDS, including viral pneumonia, and the early use of dexamethasone is safe and appears to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients. Nevertheless, no large, randomized, controlled trial was performed evaluating the role of corticosteroids in patients with ARDS due SARS-CoV2 virus. Therefore, the present study will evaluate the effectiveness of dexamethasone compared to control (no corticosteroids) in patients with moderate and severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV2 virus.

The study is composed of two parts. In part A of the study two active doses of inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin (PEG-ADM) will be compared regarding safety and efficacy to a substance that has no therapeutic effect (placebo) in order to find an optimal and safe of the study drug. In part B of the study the highest dose that is considered safe and has demonstrated efficacy will be taken forward to collect information how well patients suffering from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) respond to treatment with inhaled pegylated adrenomedullin (PEG-ADM) compared to treatment with placebo. ARDS is a type of lung failure that cause fluid to build up in the lungs making breathing difficult or impossible.

Background: There are no proven therapies specific for Covid-19. The full spectrum of Covid-19 ranges from asymptomatic disease to mild respiratory tract illness to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, and death. The efficacy of corticosteroids in viral ARDS remains controversial. Methods: This is an internationally (Spain, Canada, China, USA) designed multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial testing dexamethasone in mechanically ventilated adult patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS caused by confirmed Covid-19 infection, admitted in a network of Spanish ICUs. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either dexamethasone plus standard intensive care, or standard intensive care alone. Patients in the dexamethasone group will receive an intravenous dose of 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10. The primary outcome is 60-day mortality. The secondary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days at 28 days. All analyses will be done according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Our hypothesis is that treating ARDS caused by COVID-19 with bevacizumab improves mortality. This is a phase II, multi-centered, randomized, open label, two-armed clinical trial to study the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab in COVID-19 positive patients who consequently developed ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) and who have previously received anti-viral and anti-inflammatory treatment.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of siltuximab compared with normal saline in combination with standard of care (SOC) in selected hospitalized patients with COVID-19 previously treated with corticosteroids or another respiratory virus infection associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.