Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Insufficiency"

This study aims to examine the tolerance, feasibility, and physiological effects in airway clearance by using a novel non-invasive oscillating transducer device (NIOD, FrequencerTM) in critically ill children. The project is two years long with two separate stages of investigation. This study specifically examines different frequencies of NIOD to find the best frequency on patients outcomes.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of treatment with HFNC (group A) compared to administration of oxygen therapy by Venturi mask (group B, standard therapy) in terms of reaching of endotracheal intubation criteria during acute respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia. Inclusion Criteria: Respiratory rate (RR) at rest ≥30 bpm or presence of respiratory distress (severe dyspnoea at rest or use of accessory respiratory muscles or abdominal paradox); PaO2 / FiO2 ≤250 during oxygenation with Venturi Oxygenation mask at FiO2 = 50% administered for at least 60 minutes; Diagnosis of pneumonia as the sole cause of acute respiratory failure. Randomization: 150 consecutive patients will be randomized either to High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation (75 patients, HFNCO with flow ≥ 60 L/min and FiO2 to maintain SpO2 ≥ ) or Venturi Mask Oxygenation (control, 75 patients). Patients from both groups will be treated with antibiotic therapy according to the IDSA/ATS 2007 guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia and the IDSA/ATS 2016 guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia. Intubation Criteria: MAJOR CRITERIA: Cardiac or respiratory arrest Breathing pauses with loss of consciousness Severe hemodynamic instability Need for sedation MINOR CRITERIA (maintained for ≥1h): Reduction ≥30% of the value of the PaO2/FiO 2 compared to baseline Increased 20% if PaCO2 PaCO2 previous ≥40mmHg Worsening alertness as increased by one degree on the Kelly scale Persistence or onset of respiratory distress Vital parameters, Kelly scale and arterial blood gas analysis (BGA) will be performed on admission, and at 1, 24, at 48 hours, at the achievement of clinical stability, and whenever there is a clinical worsening. Patients enrolled in HFNC arm will continue HFNC oxygenation until clinical stability, defined as: Body temperature ≤ 37°C and ≥36°C for 24 consecutive hours Good ability in swallowing CRP and WBC normalization trend than the admission exams Hemodynamic stability Lack of respiratory distress SpO2 94-98% The primary outcome variable is the proportion of patients who reach the endotracheal intubation criteria - regardless of the actual intubation rate - within the first 48 hours of treatment. The primary analysis will be performed on the ITT population

Coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) is a highly infectious respiratory disease that causes respiratory, physical and psychological dysfunction in patients. With the increased understanding of the severity of COVID-19 and clinical evidence in accordance with the opinions of first-line clinical experts involved in the treatment of this epidemic, the investigators believe that the participation of patients with sequelae of COVID-19 in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program would be of utmost importance. According to recent scientific recommendations for patients with sequelae of COVID-19, respiratory rehabilitation would alleviate symptoms of dyspnea, anxiety and depression and, eventually, improve physical functions and quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to anticipate early rehabilitation after the acute phase of ARDS, in order to limit the severity of the effects of the ICU and promote rapid functional recovery. Physiotherapy will play a role in providing exercise, mobilization and rehabilitation interventions for survivors of critical illnesses associated with COVID-19, in order to enable a functional social return.

The objective of this study is to investigate i) the effect of 3 weeks IMT to adults post-stroke to maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and ii) the effects of 3 weeks IMT to the degree of dependency in activities of daily living, endurance in gait, fatigue, voice volume, phonation endurance, and expiratory function. Methods/Design: Randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing IMT to conventional neurorehabilitation (usual practise). 80 patients, with reduced maximal inspiration pressure (MIP) hospitalized at a specialized neurorehabilitation hospital in Denmark will be included.

SARS-CoV-2, one of a family of human coronaviruses, was initially identified in December 2019 in Wuhan city. This new coronavirus causes a disease that has now been named COVID-19. The virus has subsequently spread throughout the world and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organisation on 11th March 2020. As of April 1, 2020, there are 874.081 numbers of confirmed cases with 43.290 fatalities. There is no approved therapy for COVID-19 and the current standard of care is supportive treatment. Key markers implying a fatal outcome are acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like disease with pronounced dyspnea, hypoxia and radiological changes in the lung. Senicapoc improves oxygenation and reduces fluid retention, inflammation, and bleeding in the lungs of mice with ARDS-like disease. In cells, there is an antiviral effect of senicapoc.

To evaluate the effectiveness of two protocols of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in cerebral palsy patients to improve respiratory strength, spirometric parameters and dyspnea. Low-intensity vs high-intensity resistance training programs. Evaluations: Determination of the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the maximum expiratory pressure (MEP); spirometry - maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), peak expiratory flow (PEF), tidal volume (TV); functional capacity measured with 6 minute walk test; dyspnea using the Borg scale and clinical evaluations. The participants will be evaluated at the beginning and end of the intervention period. Intervention: There are two groups of patients, one works with low loads (20% MIP) and another with high loads (40% MIP). They train 5 days/week 15 cycles lasting 1 minute. There is a rest of 1 minute between each cycle.

To evaluate the use of Life2000® Ventilator, a novel proportional open ventilation system in critical care use of acute onset of respiratory failure (ARF) and mild to moderate forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 patients and its ability to provide effective ventilatory benefits and or delay patients from progressing to more aggressive forms of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is a new form of partial support wherein the machine applies positive pressure throughout inspiration in proportion to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), Because ventilator functioning and cycling are under control of the patient's respiratory drive and rhythm, NAVA has the potential to enhance patient-ventilator interaction ensuring synchrony and minimizing the risk of over-assistance. Among different interfaces, the pediatric helmet is better tolerated than facial or nasal mask, thus requiring less sedation and allowing more prolonged ventilatory assistance (5-6).To date, no data exist on the use of NAVA in infants during noninvasive ventilation. The aim of this physiological study is to compare patient-ventilator interaction in infants receiving NIV by NAVA and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) with helmet.

Goal of the study: To show that prehospital NPPV use for COPD decompensation, as compared to only standard medical treatment, might enable a decrease in intubation rate. Primary end point: the rate of endotracheal intubation in the first three hours after randomization. Secondary en points: rate of endotracheal intubation after third hour, rate of prehospital and ICU mortality, ICU days, effects on clinical parameters (respiratory rate, SpO2, heart rate, arterial blood pressure, consciousness) and arterial blood gases (pH, PaCO2, PaO2), 30 days mortality, delays between first medical contact and in-hospital admission, relation between initial pH level and endotracheal intubation. Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (>18 years), with GCS≥10, known or suspected COPD and presenting acute respiratory decompensation with respiratory acidosis. Exclusion criteria: Cardiac or respiratory arrest, upper gastro intestinal tract haemorrhage, shock, serious ventricular arrhythmia, severe sepsis, multiple organ failure, serious cranial-facial trauma, upper airways obstruction, undrained pneumothorax, uncooperative-agitated patients refusing the technique, respiratory distress with bradypnoea < 12/min, pauses gasps repeated bradycardia, intractable vomiting, acute traumatic tetraplegia, persistant hemodynamic instability with PAS<90mmHg, ensuitable environment. Randomization: Assignment to NPPV group or standard therapy group will be performed at the time of arrival of the SAMU team to the patient, by calling a physician located at the calldispatch center who will connect to the web site of the clinical research unit from Bordeaux university hospital. Period of study: 25 months (24 months for patients inclusion and 1 month for follow-up). Number of patients: 199 patients in each group i.e 398 patients (significance level of 5%, power of 80%; 50% expected decrease of intubation rate, i.e. from 20 to 10%). Main investigator: Dr Pierre-Arnaud Fort, MD, Pôle Urgences-SAMU47-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Saint-Esprit - Agen. Participating centers : 20 SAMU-SMUR corresponding to 19 departments in France.

This study is looking at whether there is a difference in outcomes using two different types of breathing support in those patients who have chronic respiratory failure (patients who under-breathe). There is little data to demonstrate which mode of ventilation is better in terms of physiological outcomes and outcome data relating to patient symptoms. We hypothesize that one type of breathing support: pressure support ventilation would be more comfortable for patients as it more closely matches a patient's own respiratory pattern and and so leads to improved adherence and consequent improvement in quality of life. Patients with respiratory failure will be randomly assigned to receive either pressure support ventilation or pressure control ventilation for the first 6 weeks and then cross-over to receive the mode not previously used for a further 6 weeks. They will have baseline data recorded and then be followed up after each 6 week block.