Active clinical trials for "Retinal Diseases"

We hypothesized that to reduce the adverse effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on ocular tissue and whole body, intravitreal injection of a low concentration of bevacizumab and conducting vitrectomy shortly after the injection is useful. In the present prospective, double-masked, randomized, controlled study, we aimed to verify the usefulness of intravitreal injection of 0.16 mg/0.05 ml bevacizumab one day before conducting vitrectomy for PDR.

To evaluate the ocular and systemic safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection in patients undergoing Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

Background Diabetic eye disease is the most frequent complication among the 320,000 Danes with diabetes. The formation of new vessels (PDR) in the inner part of the eye (retina) is a feared complication and a leading cause of blindness, since these vessels are fragile and often cause bleeding within the eye. Peripheral retinal laser treatment (PRP) halves the risk of blindness, but often comes with a high prize. The peripheral part of the retina is responsible for the visual field and the night vision, and PRP limits these abilities (i.e. loss of driving license). The technique of PRP has principally been the same for the past 40 years with standard treatment given for all patients. With this one size fits all approach, a substantial number of patients will either be treated too much or too little. Too little treatment is inefficient, and disease progression may occur. Excessive treatment may cause side effects like loss of visual fields and decreased night vision. Therefore, it is important to test if treatment can be applied on an individual basis to give high efficacy treatment with minimal side effects. IMPETUS 2018 - TREAT is the second of two studies aimed at making an individual design for retinal laser treatment. In IMPETUS 2018 - DETECT the investigators demonstrated that non-invasive examinations of the oxygen level and measurements of the retinal vascular tree provide important information of individual treatment response. For instance, if standard PRP led to three per cent higher retinal oxygen saturation, there was a 4-fold risk of disease progression despite treatment. Hence, such a patient would benefit from more treatment to avoid blindness. With these observations at hand, the investigators want to compare a less invasive treatment (individualized laser treatment) against the standard PRP. Another essential aspect in the treatment of PDR is to be able to give the right diagnosis and to evaluate the efficacy of laser treatment. So far, this has been performed by fluorescein angiography. However, this examination are highly person-dependent and unpleasant to patients, and a more objective approach is needed. Optical coherent tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a quick, noninvasive scanning of the retina which is ideal to visualize moving objects like blood within the retinal vessels. The method has been successfully implemented in a number of retinal diseases, but it has never been validated in PDR. Standard PRP is often performed in 3-4 sessions. However, it may be painful, and patients sometimes choose not to complete all sessions after the initial treatment has been given. There is insufficient knowledge of the patient-barriers to treatment, and it is important to address these in an individualized treatment design. Aim In this 6-month 1:1 randomized, prospective study the investigators want to investigate 1) whether individualized retinal laser treatment compared with standard PRP has the same efficacy but less side effects, 2) whether OCT-A can be used as an objective marker for disease activity, and 3) to obtain a better understanding of patient-reported barriers to standard laser treatment PRP and whether these can be addressed with personalized retinal laser treatment. Setup Fifty eight consecutively recruited patients (1 May 2017 - 30 April 2018) with newly diagnosed PDR referred to the Department of Ophthalmology, OUH, and randomly assigned to standard PRP (n=29) or individualized laser treatment (n=29). Intervention Standard laser treatment is performed in all four quadrants of the retina. Individualized laser treatment is only performed in the part(s) of the retina with proliferation(s). Both treatments are carried out at baseline (BL), and additional treatment is given at month three (M3) and/or (M6), if necessary. Investigations Retinal digital images, fluorescein angiography, OCT-A (BL, M3, M6). Test of visual fields, dark adaptation and quality of life (BL, M6). Semi-structured interview will be performed with five patients who have received PRP in one eye and individualized laser treatment in the other eye. This will address treatment experience, potential barriers to treatment, etc. What to measure: Differences in need for retreatment, night blindness, visual fields, visual acuity, bleeding in the eye, surgery, and quality of life between the groups.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneously administered AKB-9778 15mg once daily or 15mg twice daily for 12 months in patients with moderate to severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).

The main objective is to evaluate ocular and systemic safety and tolerability of BI 1467335 as well as whether BI 1467335 monotherapy has a potential to improve retinal lesions in patients with moderately severe Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (DRSS level 47) or severe Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (DRSS level 53), without Center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME)

Objectives: Main objective: To compare the percentage of patients with new microaneurysm or hard exudates after 12 months between the CPAP group and the control group. Secondary objectives: To compare the central macula volume, ganglion cell layer thickness and central fovea thickness at baseline and 12, 24 and 52 weeks after randomization between the two study groups; to compare the percentage of patients who have an improvement loss of visual acuity (more than or equal to 15 letters in patients with macular edema and more than or equal to five letters in patients without macular edema) among the baseline visit and the weeks 12, 24 and 52 between the two study groups; to compare the percentage of patients who reach a higher level of diabetic retinopathy at 54 weeks between the two study groups; to compare the resolution time of central macula thickness from the randomization between the two study groups; to compare the glycated hemoglobin at baseline and 12, 24 and 52 weeks after randomization between the two study groups; and to compare the serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress biomarkers, sympathetic tone, and intake regulator hormones at baseline and 12 and 52 weeks after randomization between the two study groups. Methodology: Randomized, multicenter, non-blinded, parallel groups, conventional treatment-controlled trial of 12 months of duration. Subjects will randomize to conventional dietary and pharmacological treatment or conventional dietary and pharmacological treatment plus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Study subjects: Subjects 35 to 75 years with type 2 diabetes and a clinical diagnosis of mild diabetic retinopathy (with or without macular edema), better visual acuity from 20/40 to 20/320 letters and refraction with a spherical equivalent less than ± 5 diopter. Efficacy variables: Thickness of the central sub-field, central subfield volume, ganglion cell layer thickness, and presence of clinical or subclinical macular edema, serous retinal or retinal pigment epithelium detachment, intraretinal cysts or haemorrhages assessed by optical coherence tomography; presence of cotton exudates, microhemorrhages, microaneurysms, , microvascular retinal abnormalities, or a vein/artery ratio > 2/1 in examination of ocular fundus/retinography; better corrected visual acuity; glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c); fasting glucose and insulin; homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) and QUICKI indices; lipid profile, troponin I, proBNP, homocysteine and C-reactive protein; systemic biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial damage, sympathetic activity and appetite-regulating hormones and clinical questionnaires: short form (SF)-12, visual function questionnaire (VFQ25) and iPAQ.

A randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of single-session pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) using Pattern Scan Laser (PASCAL) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) - 1,700 shots vs 2,500 shots

The study will evaluate the safety of ophthalmic bevacizumab in subjects diagnosed with a retinal condition that would benefit from treatment with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, including: exudative age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, or branch retinal vein occlusion.

The study's main purpose is to asses the safety, tolerability, and effect of oral administration of RG7774 on the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in participants with moderately severe to severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and good vision.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APX3330 to treat diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME).