Active clinical trials for "Retinal Vein Occlusion"

Purpose: To determine whether a fluocinolone acetonide sustained drug delivery implant is effective in the treatment of retinal vein occlusion that has caused persistent macular edema and decreased visual acuity. Hypothesis: A fluocinolone acetonide sustained drug delivery implant will be a safe and effective method to treat patients with macular edema and decreased vision from retinal vein occlusion.

The primary Objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intraocular injections of 0.5mg or 2.0mg of ranibizumab in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.

Antagonists of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway are effective in treating macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In the eye, the two most widely used anti-VEGF agents are ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Only ranibizumab has been FDA-approved for the treatment of macular edema from RVO, however bevacizumab has been used off-label by many ophthalmologists with good success. Furthermore, the cost of bevacizumab is less than one-tenth the cost of ranibizumab. Here the investigators conduct a six month randomized, prospective interventional trial comparing the effectiveness of ranibizumab with bevacizumab in the treatment of macular edema from RVO. Primary outcome measures are change in central retinal thickness. Secondary measures are change in visual acuity from baseline and change in angiographic properties of macular lesions from baseline after treatment.

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new formulation of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of retinal blood vessel disorders. Triamcinolone is a steroid drug that decreases inflammation and scarring and is routinely used to treat eye inflammation or swelling. The commercially available form of this drug is associated with potentially harmful side effects thought to be due to preservatives in the preparation. This study will use a formulation that does not contain these potentially harmful preservatives. Preliminary findings from other studies suggest that injection of steroids in the eye can reduce retinal thickening and improve vision. However, they may also cause mild discomfort and lead to vision-threatening conditions. The effects of the drug on the conditions under study in this protocol are not known. Patients with the following conditions involving disorders of retinal blood vessels may be eligible for this study: Choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration (50 years of age and older) Macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (18 years of age and older) Diabetic macular edema ((18 years of age and older) Participants undergo the following tests and procedures: Medical history and physical examination Eye examination to assess visual acuity (eye chart test) and eye pressure, and to examine pupils, lens, retina and eye movements. The pupils will be dilated with drops for this examination. Fluorescein angiography to evaluate the eye's blood vessels. A yellow dye is injected into an arm vein and travels to the blood vessels in the eyes. Pictures of the retina are taken using a camera that flashes a blue light into the eye. The pictures show if any dye has leaked from the vessels into the retina, indicating possible blood vessel abnormality. Indocyanine green angiography to identify feeder vessels that may be supplying abnormal blood vessels. This procedure is similar to fluorescein angiography, but uses a green dye and flashes an invisible light. Optical coherence tomography to measure retinal thickness. This test shines a light into the eye and produces cross-sectional pictures of the retina. These measurements are repeated during the study to determine if retinal thickening is getting better or worse, or staying the same. Stereoscopic color fundus photography to examine the back of the eye. The pupils are dilated with eye drops to allow examination and photography of the back of the eye. Triamcinolone acetonide injection to treat the eye. A numbing eye drop, an antibiotic eye drop, and an injected antibiotic are put in the eye before triamcinolone acetonide is injected into the eye's vitreous (jelly-like substance inside the eye). After the injection, the patient lies on his or her back for 30 minutes. An antibiotic eye ointment is used for 2 days following treatment. Blood tests to measure liver and kidney function. Patients return to the clinic for follow-up visits 1, 4, and 7 days, and 1 month after the first treatment. Patients whose condition does not improve after 3 months do not receive any more injections, but return for eye examinations at least once a year for 3 years. Patients whose condition improves with treatment return for follow-up visits 6 and 9 months after the first injection and then every 6 months for 2 more years. At each visit, a determination is made whether another injection is needed. After each repeat injection, patients return for follow-up visits at 1, 4, and 7 days after the injection.

To investigate the efficacy of laser photocoagulation combined with ranibizumab intravitreal injection in macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in long term.

This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of faricimab administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection at 4-week intervals until Week 24, followed by a double-masked period of study without active control to evaluate faricimab administered according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen in patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO).

This prospective non-randomized open-label interventional study aimed to evaluate feasibility in regard to potential efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injected in the suprachoroidal space (SCS) as a promising therapeutic route that provides a better bioavailability, longer sustained duration of action, and thus improved patients' compliance for the treatment of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

In central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) a blood clot blocks the venous outflow of the entire retinal circulation. This leads to retinal and vitreous hemorrhages, retinal edema and neovascularization. The development of a microneedle and surgical stabilizer made it possible to perform a prolonged (10 minutes) retinal vein cannulation with infusion of Ocriplasmin. Ocriplasmin has the advantage over tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) that it already is an active enzyme and a strong fibrinolyticum. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of local intravenous Ocriplasmin for CRVO.

The aim of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections of ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema due to BRVO if the re-treatment regimen is guided by morphological macular changes detected by OCT compared to re-treatment according to SmPC defined re-treatment criteria (in case of increase of CRT and concomitant decrease of BCVA).

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second leading cause of retinal vascular disease in patients older than 50 years.The prevalence varies from 0.7% to 1.6% in the literature. Visual recovery depends on ischemic damage of the retina, the occurence of macular edema (ME) and the development of neovascular glaucoma. The occurence of ME is the main reason for visual loss and frustrates visual recovery among patients with both central or branch RVO. Therapeutic options that have been used and discussed over the years are the treatment with anticoagulants, fibrinolytics, corticosteroids, acetazolamide and isovolemic haemodilution. Furthermore, surgical options like vitrectomy and radial optic neurotomy were used. Panretinal photocoagulation and grid pattern photocoagulation had established as additional tool to induce chorioretinal anastomosis. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and the evidence of these different treatment options could not be verified and remains mostly unknown. Nowadays, intravitreal anti-VEGF application had become the treatment of choice for ME secondary to RVO. Multi-center studies have already shown the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatment to reduce intraretinal fluid and retinal hemorrhages (BRAVO, CRUISE). Unfortunately, often high numbers of re-treatments become necessary over the years. In our knowledge, there are no reports showing more than 3 years treatment effects of antiangiogenic drugs in patients with BRVO. However, the results of treatment effect longer than 3 years are important, as the mean age < 70 years with an onset of BRVO has been estimated in about 60% of all cases. In addition, most patients with regard to the application of anti-VEGF treatment in real clinical setting, there is only rare experience concerning need of optimum time duration for follow-up at the departments. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes, safety and therapeutic benefit of a flexible dosing regimen of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with ME secondary to BRVO.