Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial"

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 months of treatment with 300 IR of STG320 sublingual tablets compared with placebo in adults and adolescents with HDM-associated allergic rhinitis.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind within the dose level, parallel group comparison of mometasone furoate nasal spray in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis to examine the minimal effective dose, the recommended dose, and the dosing regimen.

6-month safety extension study in subjects who have completed Study 060-633 (NCT00953147). Evaluating the long-term safety of ciclesonide HFA nasal aerosol 160 μg administered once-daily in patients with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.

This is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, four-period, incomplete block, crossover study, with 8 days repeat dosing of intranasal Fluticasone Propionate (25, 50, 100, 200ug) and/or placebo in the Vienna Challenge Chamber in subjects with allergic rhinitis.

The purpose of this study is to determine if two allergy medications are more effective than placebo.

The primary objective of the study was to characterize the difference in prepubescent growth velocity in children 3 to 9 years of age with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) treated with triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) nasal spray (NASACORT® AQ 110 μg treatment group) or placebo (NASACORT® AQ placebo group) for 12-months. The secondary objectives were to compare the following in prepubertal participants treated with TAA nasal spray versus placebo: the 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels and the cortisol/creatinine ratio (to measure the Hypothalamic-Pituitary Adrenal [HPA] axis function) the rate of treatment-emergent-adverse-events (TEAE) global efficacy rated by the investigator and the participant separately the rate of use of rescue medication during the study

To assess the safety of long-term use of cetirizine dry syrup in children with perennial allergic rhinitis.

There has been considerable debate over the last 30 years about the interaction between asthma and parasitic infection. It has been suggested that at least part of the reason for the increasing prevalence of asthma in the developed world is a decrease in parasite infections resulting from improved living conditions with economic development. Our previous studies in Ethiopia suggest that hookworm infection may be particularly important in this process. To establish definitively whether parasites can protect against allergic disease, and specifically asthma, ultimately requires a randomised clinical trial of parasite infection in patients with asthma. We, the researchers at the University of Nottingham, have completed a study in normal volunteers to establish the dose of hookworms necessary to generate infection at the level shown to be protective in population surveys, and shown that infection is well tolerated. We now propose two randomised placebo-controlled double blind clinical trials. The first will test the effectiveness of hookworm infection in reducing symptoms in allergic patients with rhinitis, and will also serve to allow us to check the likely safety of hookworm infection in asthma. Assuming that the results of this study are favourable, we will then carry out a trial of hookworm infection in asthma. We will also take the opportunity during both of these studies to investigate the cellular mechanisms of the effect of hookworm infection on the immune system.

This study was designed to assess safety of an investigational nasal spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Perennial allergic rhinitis is triggered by house dust, mite and mold etc. Typical symptoms are sneezing, nasal congestion and pruritus and rhinorrhea.

This is a Phase 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center, double-blind study to evaluate the effects of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in subjects with Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) associated with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), Embletta device home-monitored cardiopulmonary evaluations, and rhinitis evaluations and questionnaires. Approximately 30 subjects 18 to 60 years of age with symptomatic PAR (with or without SAR) will be selected and randomized at one study site. The anticipated duration of subject participation in the study is approximately 39 days. Subjects who qualify at the Screening Visit will complete a 10-14 day run-in/screening period. Following the run-in period, subjects who meet the qualifications at the Baseline Visit will be treated with study medication for 4 weeks.