Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic"

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is induced by an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reaction in the allergen-sensitized subjects, affecting 10% to 40% of the world population. AR could be divided into two kinds, perennial AR and seasonal AR (SAR). In recent years, biologics have become promising drugs for allergic diseases. The efficacy and safety of Omalizumab in treating SAR have been well proven by previous studies. However, the efficacy in preseasonal treatment for SAR has not yet been studied before.

This is a phase 4 study to evaluate the the efficacy of second generation antihistamine on cough outcomes in cough patients with allergic rhinitis.

A randomized, single-center, double-blind, ascending multiple-dose, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CSPCHA115 capsules in Chinese healthy volunteers.

In allergic rhinitis patients with severe symptoms, control of severe allergic reactions is limited with saline nasal irrigation. Therefore, there have been several attempts to use saline nasal irrigation in combination with other treatments to treat allergic rhinitis. This study tries to explore the effect of nasal irrigation with Chinese herbal medicines on allergic rhinitis.

The aim of this clinical study is to compare the efficacy of Elonide Nasal Spray to Nasonex Nasal Spray and Placebo (non-active ingredient) in the management of allergic rhinitis. There are two hypotheses of this study: Elonide nasal spray is same efficacy to Nasonex nasal spray. Elonide nasal spray is more efficient to placebo.

This study was to investigate the comparison among acute effects of various aerobic exercise on symptoms in allergic rhinitis patients.

Efficacy and safety of HCP1102 capsule : A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 clinical trial.

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 and 18200 SU (Standardized Units) are being developed to compare with the current dose of 5100 SU. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and safety of these two new cumulative dose regimens of Grass MATA MPL compared with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) due to grass pollen, to enable selection of the best dose to go into a larger scale study to assess the efficacy and safety of the higher cumulative doses.

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. The current therapeutic dose regimen for Grass MATA MPL is a course of four injections of 300, 800, 2000 and 2000 SU (Standardized Units), administered at weekly intervals (cumulative dose 5100 SU). Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 SU and 18200 SU are being developed to compare with the current dose. The study is designed to explore the benefit/risk of increasing the cumulative allergen dose of the Grass MATA MPL immunotherapy comparing these doses with the current dose of Grass MATA MPL, Grass MATA (without MPL) and placebo.

To evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of GSP 301 NS compared to 2 placebo NS formulations for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)