Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic"

Primary Objective: To assess efficacy of Nasacort® (triamcinolone) nasal spray, 55 µg per dose, in comparison with Flixonase® (fluticasone) nasal spray, 50 µg per dose, by reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) (24 h) after 28 days of treatment compared with baseline (0 day of treatment) in adult patients suffering from PAR (perennial allergic rhinitis). Secondary Objectives: To evaluate safety of Nasacort® (triamcinolone) nasal spray, in comparison with Flixonase® (fluticasone) administered for 28 days by assessment of adverse events reports. To evaluate patient and physician satisfaction after 28 days of treatment by 5-point scale. To estimate improvement of quality of life during the study by mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniRQLQ).

Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).

The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of cetirizine HCl syrup vs. loratadine syrup vs. placebo syrup in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years old.

The aim of this clinical study is to compare the efficacy of Elonide Nasal Spray to Nasonex Nasal Spray and Placebo (non-active ingredient) in the management of allergic rhinitis. There are two hypotheses of this study: Elonide nasal spray is same efficacy to Nasonex nasal spray. Elonide nasal spray is more efficient to placebo.

In allergic rhinitis patients with severe symptoms, control of severe allergic reactions is limited with saline nasal irrigation. Therefore, there have been several attempts to use saline nasal irrigation in combination with other treatments to treat allergic rhinitis. This study tries to explore the effect of nasal irrigation with Chinese herbal medicines on allergic rhinitis.

This study was to investigate the comparison among acute effects of various aerobic exercise on symptoms in allergic rhinitis patients.

Efficacy and safety of HCP1102 capsule : A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 clinical trial.

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. The current therapeutic dose regimen for Grass MATA MPL is a course of four injections of 300, 800, 2000 and 2000 SU (Standardized Units), administered at weekly intervals (cumulative dose 5100 SU). Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 SU and 18200 SU are being developed to compare with the current dose. The study is designed to explore the benefit/risk of increasing the cumulative allergen dose of the Grass MATA MPL immunotherapy comparing these doses with the current dose of Grass MATA MPL, Grass MATA (without MPL) and placebo.

There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 and 18200 SU (Standardized Units) are being developed to compare with the current dose of 5100 SU. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and safety of these two new cumulative dose regimens of Grass MATA MPL compared with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) due to grass pollen, to enable selection of the best dose to go into a larger scale study to assess the efficacy and safety of the higher cumulative doses.

The investigators will perform double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial which evaluates the efficacy and safety of allergen-specific intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) for allergens including Dermatophagoides farinae (Df), Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp), cat, and dog that are sensitized and provoke rhinitis-related symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), using allergen extracts for allergen-specific immunotherapy (Tyrosine S, Allergy Therapeutic, West Sussex, UK).