Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic"

The primary objective of the current study is to investigate the safety and tolerability of BI 671800 HEA in healthy Chinese male volunteers following single oral administration, and healthy Japanese male volunteers following single oral administration and multiple administrations.

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of ACT-129968 in adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, due to mountain cedar pollen.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether buffered hypertonic saline (BHS) is superior to normal saline (NSS) for improving mucociliary function and relief nasal symptoms in children with allergic rhinitis.

The study will assess the efficacy of OC000459 200 mg twice daily orally in comparison to placebo when subjects are challenged in the Vienna Challenge Chamber for 6 hours. This is a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, two way crossover evaluation. There will be a screening period of up to three weeks and a washout period of at least one week between the two treatment periods. There will be a follow up one to three weeks after the last dose of study drug.

This is a randomized, multicenter, 2-way crossover study in subjects 12 years or older with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) to evaluate patient preference, satisfaction and efficacy of ciclesonide nasal aerosol versus mometasone aqueous nasal spray. A novel patient-administered assessment, developed and validated to measure patient satisfaction with and preference of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR), is utilized in this study.

The primary objective is to assess the effect of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) on the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of fluticasone propionate (FLU) when administered as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) compared to a similar formulation without containing AZE (i.e. FLU alone in the MP29-02 vehicle; REF). The secondary objectives are to compare the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of FLU when administered either as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) or as marketed FLU product, Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, Roxane Laboratories (COMP); To compare the effects of AZE on other pharmacokinetic parameters of FLU (AUC0 tlast, CL/f, Cmax, tmax, t½); To assess adverse events.

The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the effects (effectiveness and safety)of an intranasal corticosteroid (fluticasone furoate nasal spray [FFNS]) with a placebo nasal spray for the treatment of irritant (non-allergic) rhinitis.

This study examined the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of mometasone nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Patients received mometasone for 12 weeks plus an additional 12 weeks if patient agreed to continue. Dose of mometasone could be decreased or increased during the study based on patient's response.

This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group comparison study to verify the clinical equivalency of the old formulation (50 mcg as mometasone furoate [MF] in 50 μL of solution per spray) to the new formulation (50 mcg as MF in 100 μL of solution per spray) in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

The purpose of this study was to assess local nasal adverse effects, as well as systemic effects, of PATANASE nasal spray when compared with Patanase Vehicle, pH 3.7 and Patanase Vehicle, pH 7.0 in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).