Active clinical trials for "Rib Fractures"

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to determine whether acute and chronic pain in patients who suffer multiple traumatic rib fractures is decreased after surgical management as compared to conservative management.

The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether continuous PVB is equal in efficacy to epidural anesthesia in terms of analgesia in patients with INR lower than 1.2, or is continuous ICNB equal in efficacy to PCA in terms of analgesia, if patients have INRs equal to or greater than 1.2.

This study evaluates the efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures, as compared to best medical management, for patients with multiple, displaced rib fractures. Half of patients will be randomized to surgery (in addition to best medical management), whereas the other half will be randomized to medical therapy only. The primary outcome will be the subjects overall quality of life measured at two months following injury.

Management of traumatic rib fractures continues to be a challenge for trauma surgeons. Currently, many analgesic options are available to patients suffering from rib fractures. Formulations currently used for conventional intercostal nerve blocks (CINB) are relatively safe, do not require additional equipment or specialized anesthesia personnel, do not require catheter repositioning, and provide improved analgesia immediately over the aforementioned systemic therapies. A goal of these authors to introduce an additional safe option for extended local analgesia in the setting of multiple rib fractures given the inconclusive evidence supporting or refuting the current standard of care

Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia. Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections. There have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.

The present clinical study will be undertaken to evaluate the effect of Ultrasound-guided Deep versus Superficial continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Chest trauma is the most common injury in the emergency trauma and rib fractures is the most common trauma in chest trauma. Severe rib fractures can cause paradoxical respiration and mediastinal swing, which has large effects on respiratory and circulatory system, result in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Mechanical ventilation can significantly improve the hypoxemia of the patients, correct paradoxical respiration, and treat the pulmonary atelectasis

The purpose of this randomized controlled study is to determine whether the serratus anterior plane block reduces pain more than the usual treatment for rib fractures in the same amount of time.

Traumatic rib fractures (RF) are a relatively common occurrence in patients of all ages, with a 10% incidence in all trauma patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adequate analgesia is paramount for preventing pulmonary complications and can reduce morbidity and mortality. There is longstanding evidence of lidocaine's effectiveness and safety in the post-operative patient and the investigators hypothesize that this modality may prove to be ideal in trauma patients with RF. Therefore, it is imperative that intravenous lidocaine be investigated to ascertain if there is significant benefit for pain reduction in patients who have sustained rib fractures. A single-centre, double-blind, randomized control trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a 72-96 hour IV lidocaine infusion plus standard analgesics versus placebo infusion plus standard analgesics will be performed on patients (age 18 or older) diagnosed with two or more traumatic rib fractures ,from blunt thoracic trauma, requiring hospital admission at Victoria Hospital. The primary outcome is mean pain score, as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) when the patient is at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes are protocol adherence, patient satisfaction as measured on the VAS, incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, mortality, incidence of lidocaine toxicity, treatment regimens (use of additional non-opioid analgesics) and total morphine equivalents used (including breakthrough doses). This trial will serve to quantify the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for patients with traumatic rib fractures. Successful completion of a single centre trial will inform the development of a multi-centre trial powered to demonstrate a reduction in respiratory failure in the trauma population.

Rib fractures pose a significant healthcare burden with its associated morbidity, long term disability, and mortality. Pulmonary morbidity is increased in these patients as a result of diminished gas exchange from fracture induced pulmonary injury and from inadequate analgesia compromising both ventilation and pulmonary mechanics. Adequate analgesia is paramount in enhancing pulmonary hygiene aimed at preventing atelectasis and pneumonia. Numbing the nerves to the fractured ribs by injecting local anaesthetic (LA) improves breathing and reduces the risk of complications. Two techniques of regional anesthesia (erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB)) will be compared regarding their efficacy for treating pain caused by rib fractures. The LA is injected near nerves at two different locations. The PVB is immediately adjacent to the vertebrae, whereas the ESPB is slightly further away from the midline. Both techniques use ultrasound to ensure the LA is directed to the intended place. Adult patients with > 3 consecutive fractured ribs will be consented, then randomised to receive either a ESPB or a PVB. It is expected that both groups will significantly improve in terms of pain score, opioids need, and breathing ability, however it is unclear which technique will provide better results and less complications.