Hyaluronic Acid, Corticosteroid and Electrotherapy in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
Subacromial ImpingementPain1 moreBackground: Electrotherapy, corticosteroid, and hyaluronic acid have been used to treat subacromial impingement syndrome. However, we need to compare treatment options to provide the optimal results. This study aims to compare the effect of hyaluronic acid, corticosteroid, and electrotherapy in subacromial impingement syndrome. Design: Ninety five patients were randomised into three equal groups according to treatment types. Hyaluronic acid (20 mg/2ml, three times one week apart) or corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide, 40 mg/ml, single dose) treatments were applied as subacromial injections. Electrotherapy consisted of 14 sessions TENS (20 min.), hotpack (20 min.) and ultrasound (1.5watt/cm2, 1 MHz, 6 min.). Patients were evaluated before treatment, one and four weeks post end of treatment. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) were used as outcome measures.
Effects of the Kinetic Chain Approach for Scapular Dyskinesis
Shoulder Impingement SyndromeVolleyball is a highly technical sport which involved powerful overhead movements performed repetitively. Shoulder injuries is the third-most commonly injured body part in volleyball, with the majority resulting from chronic overuse. Abnormal scapular motions and positions relative to the thorax have been linked to various shoulder pathologies, including subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tears, and glenohumeral inferior instability. Also, Muscular imbalances around the shoulder complex could lead to dyskinesis and resulting in shoulder joint injuries (e.g. instability and impingement). The concept of "kinetic chain" is coordinated sequencing of the segments. Sequential activation of the LE, pelvis and trunk muscles is required to facilitate the forces to be transferred appropriately from these body segments to the UE. Reeser et al. have identified risk factors for volleyball-related shoulder pain and dysfunction. They found volleyball athletes who demonstrated core instability would show greater relevance to SICK scapula, and they also more likely to report a history of shoulder problems. Sciascia et al. also have reviewed that 49% athletes with posterior-superior labral tears showed either decreased hip rotators flexibility or decreased hip abductors strength. Consequently, the deficits in kinetic chain segments would resulted in scapula dyskinesis, even lead to shoulder girdle dysfunction or injury. Therefore, the modern training programs for athletes, especially in overhead players, should combine kinetic chain exercises to improve upper- and lower body core strength, sport-specific strength, performance, and prevent injury occurrence or recurrence. In consideration of no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed to determine whether kinetic chain exercise would be more effective to conventional scapula training for patients with secondary shoulder impingement. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of kinetic chain management approach (KC) and conventional training of scapula dyskinesis (CT) in volleyball athletes with scapular dyskinesia. The investigators hypothesized that KC group would be more effective in self-reported pain, and their scapula would become more stable during movement task (arm-lifting and spiking) after a 4-week training program than CT group.
Standardized and Modified Corticosteroid Subacromial Injection for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome...
Shoulder ImpingementSubacromial injection is a useful procedure to counteract shoulder impingement syndrome. With the aid of high-resolution ultrasound, the needle can be introduced precisely into the subacromial/subdeltoid bursa located between the acromion above and the supraspinatus tendon below. The standardized method allows the injectate to distribute along the subdeltoid bursa, further reliving pain from subacromial/subdeltoid impingement. In a substantial part of shoulder pain patients, it is common to accompany pain along the bicipital groove, which the biceps long head tendon courses through. The biceps long head tendon is attached to the superior labrum of the glenoid cavity and acts as the second important structure to prevent upward migration of the humeral head, following the supraspinatus tendon. Overuse injury of the biceps tendon is a likely cause of anterior shoulder pain. Concomitant administration of medication into the subacromial bursa and biceps tendon sheath is theoretically more effective than injection to the subacromial bursa only because the formal procedure targets two vulnerable structures in shoulder impingement syndrome at once. Regarding the standard ultrasound-guided subacromial injection. Therefore, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of standard subacromial injection in comparison with a novel approach simultaneously injecting the subacromial bursa and biceps tendon sheath.
Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Approach Using High Intensity Laser Therapy
Subacromial ImpingementThe purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of high intensity laser therapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome.
Dry Needling for Sub Acromial Pain Syndrome
Subacromial Impingement SyndromeThis trial will investigate the benefit of trigger point dry needling (DN) for individuals with a common cause of shoulder pain - sub-acromial pain syndrome. Sub-acromial pain syndrome, also knowns as SAPS, is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Physical therapy treatments are routinely used for treating SAPS. One treatment approach that has been shown to be beneficial is a combination of exercises and manual or manipulative therapy. This approach has been shown to reduce pain and improve overall shoulder function in individuals with SAPS. Recently, a novel treatment approach for SAPS has emerged that involves trigger point DN to muscles of the shoulder and ribcage. Some studies have shown promising results for this approach while others have not found it to be helpful. Overall there is currently little research available on the benefit of trigger point DN for individuals with SAPS. This study will investigate whether adding trigger point DN to a treatment program of exercise and manual therapy provides any benefit to individuals with SAPS. To answer this question, this study will divide subjects into three groups. One group will receive just exercise and manual therapy; one group will receive manual therapy and exercise plus trigger point DN and one group will receive manual therapy and exercise plus a sham trigger point DN treatment. All patients receiving treatment in the study will attend 10 visits to a physical therapy clinic over a 6-week period. Subjects in the dry needling and sham dry needling groups will receive 6 sessions of this treatment in addition to their 10 sessions of exercise and manual therapy. The investigators will assess the effectiveness of the three treatment protocols by measuring patients pain, shoulder function and disability levels. These outcomes will be assessed at baseline, six weeks, 6 months and one year from enrolling in the study. In addition to assessing clinical outcomes following treatment, the investigators will assess the amount of health care utilized by each participant in the year following enrollment in the study. The 3 groups will be analyzed to determine if there is a difference in the amount or type of additional healthcare utilized in the year following study enrollment. Examples of healthcare utilization include x-rays, medication and/or surgical procedures. The investigators hypothesis is that individuals that receive actual trigger point DN in addition to manual therapy and exercise interventions will demonstrate greater improvements in pain, shoulder function and disability when compared to individuals receiving exercise and manual therapy alone or exercise and manual therapy with sham needling. The investigators think these differences in clinical outcomes will be present at each of the follow-up points. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that individuals receiving actual DN will use less healthcare than those in the other two groups.
Strengthening Exercises in Shoulder Impingement (SExSI) Trial
Subacromial Impingement SyndromeThis study evaluates the addition of a high dose of simple home-based elastic band strengthening exercises to usual care in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Half of the participants receive instructions in simple home-based elastic band strengthening exercises in addition to usual care, while the other half receive usual care.
Glenohumeral Versus Subacromial Steroid Injections for Impingement Syndrome With Mild Shoulder Stiffness...
Shoulder Impingement SyndromeAdhesive Capsulitis of ShoulderA prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 51 patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome and mild stiffness. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the glenohumeral injection group (Group GH) or the subacromial injection group (Group SA). After the final follow-up, 48 patients (24 in each group) were included for analysis Using ultrasound guidance, a solution containing 1mL of triamcinolone, 4mL of 1% lidocaine, and 7mL of 0.9% normal saline was injected into either the glenohumeral or the subacromial space. The following assessments were conducted at baseline and during follow-up visits at weeks 3, 7, and 13: ROM measurements for forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation; clinical scores including VAS, ASES, and Constant.
The Effects of Manual Therapy and Scapular Exercise for the Pectoralis Minor in Individuals With...
Shoulder PainShoulder Impingement1 moreShoulder pain is the third common problem, after problems of spine. Abnormal scapular kinematics, so called scapular dyskinesis, is believed to be associated with shoulder pain. Studies showed that individuals with shoulder problems demonstrate less upward rotation, posterior tilt and external rotation during shoulder movement. The shortness of the pectoralis minor (PM) is one of the factors leading to scapular dyskinesis. Short pectoralis minor has been shown to prevent scapula from tilting posterior and rotating externally during shoulder motion. The decreased scapular posterior tilt and external rotation may decrease subacromial space and result in impingement. However, although many assessment methods have been used to assess PM tightness or shortness, no study has tested the validity of these testing methods. Moreover, although stretching exercises for PM have been shown to increase the PM length, previous studies found that PM stretching exercises did not restore scapular kinematics and did not further decrease pain and improve function. Shoulder pain and discomfort has also been reported during stretching. Therefore, rather than stretching exercise, other types of treatment that can specifically increase the PM length and restore scapular kinematics may be needed. Manual therapy could specifically increase the flexibility of PM, and scapular orientation exercises could improve scapular kinematics. These types of treatment may be better options. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated whether manual therapy combined with scapular orientation exercises could improve scapular kinematics, pain and function. Therefore, the first part of this study is to investigate which tests for length or tightness of PM can predict the scapular dyskinesis. The second part of the study is to investigate the effects of manual therapy and scapular orientation training on PM length, scapular kinematics, pain, and function in subjects with shoulder pain. In the first part of the study, 67 healthy subjects will be recruited. In the second part, 62 patients with shoulder pain will be recruited and randomized into either a PM treatment group or a control group. While no treatment will be provided for the healthy subjects in the first part, subjects with shoulder pain in the second part will receive 12 sessions of treatment in 4-6weeks, with 30-40 minutes per session. Patients in the control group will receive general shoulder strengthening exercise, while patients in the PM treatment group will have additional manual therapy and scapular orientation exercise. The measures include tests of PM length, scapular kinematics in the first and second parts, and pain and shoulder disability were also additionally assessed in the second part.
Comparison of Two Different Treatment Methods
Subacromial Impingement SyndromeMusculoskeletal Diseases4 moreA number of previous studies investigated the effects of kinesiotaping (KT) in subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).
The POST Study; POsterior Shoulder Tightness in Rotator Cuff Related Disorders
Shoulder Impingement SyndromeShoulder impingement syndrome is a very common cause of shoulder pain and normally treated with physiotherapy or surgery. Research has shown that physiotherapy is as effective as surgery, however, the incidence of surgery for this condition is on the rise internationally, nationally and locally. The most effective form of physiotherapy, however, is not known. Laboratory studies have suggested that posterior shoulder tightness may contribute to irritation of the soft tissue around the shoulder joint and perpetuate pain from shoulder impingement syndrome. There is a lack of good quality evidence to support this perspective. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment for posterior shoulder tightness in combination with 'best care' compared with 'best care' alone in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome. The study will be a randomised, controlled, double blind (patient and assessor), parallel group, feasibility study with 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients awaiting surgery will be assessed for inclusion/exclusion criteria and then randomly allocated into one of two groups. 60 patients will be assigned to receive 'best care' physiotherapy, with or without treatment for posterior shoulder tightness. Physiotherapy treatment will be delivered over 13-15 weeks and outcomes will be assessed at 0, 6-8, 13-15, 26 and 52 weeks. The results will help us to understand if this is an important part of physiotherapy treatment, which might help reduce patient's pain and disability as well as reduce the cost of treatment for the National Health Service.