Active clinical trials for "Sarcoma"

No prospective data exist about long term morbidity and quality of life after multivisceral surgical resection for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RSTS). In order to assess the safety of this surgical approach and the effect on the Quality of Life over the long period we propose a prospective observational study. The hypothesis is that the surgical treatment has no significant impact in determining a lower Quality of Life in the long term. Objectives Primary objective Estimate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of the "global health status / QoL" scale in patients primarily treated for localized RSTS, as determined in QLQ-C30 version 3.0. Secondary objectives Evaluate the long term morbidity of aggressive surgical approach to RSTS in terms of renal failure. Evaluate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of DN4 / LEFS / BPI questionnaires. Evaluate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of the following scales from QLC-C30: PF2, RF2, EF, CF, SF, FA, FI. Evaluate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of the following scales and single items from QLC-C29: Blood and mucus in stool, Stool frequency, Sexual interest, Impotence, Dyspareunia. To correlate the surgical resection pattern (number and type of organs resected) and the tumor features (size, grading and histological subtype) with the long-term morbidity and quality of life. Eligibility Inclusion criteria Adult patients (age > 18 years) with primary localized RSTS surgically treated at our institution Written, voluntary, informed consent Exclusion criteria - Recurrent disease

Background: The prognosis of patients with rare cancers in general and sarcomas in particular suffers from delay in diagnosis. Routes to diagnosis for sarcoma need to be quicker and more streamlined, but have neither been studied in detail in larger numbers before, nor in a direct comparison between two countries with different health systems. Comprehensive assessment of diagnostic delays and its determinants, including demographic, clinical, psychosocial and health care system factors, is necessary to improve referral pathways and come to best practice and patient reported outcomes for sarcoma patients. Research questions to be answered: This study aims to quantify diagnostic delay (including patient, general practitioner and system delay) and evaluates routes to diagnosis and referral to sarcoma expert centres in the Netherlands and England; to comprehensively evaluate risk factors of diagnostic delay; determine the association between diagnostic delay and outcomes (health-related quality of life, quality-adjusted life years, patient satisfaction, TNM classification, time to local/distant relapse and overall survival); and to assess differences between both countries. This should lead to advices about faster referral where possible.

Adult soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours with an estimated incidence averaging 5/100 000/year in Europe. The prognosis of soft tissue sarcomas is dominated by local recurrence and distant metastasis. A link seems to exist between local recurrence and overall survival. Local recurrence occurs in approximately 16-29% of STS of the limbs. A combination of resection and radiotherapy is the optimal treatment of primary tumours according to histological grade and surgical result. Modern imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) are normally used to rule-out a recurrence in patients operated on for STS. However, none of this technique is perfect and different advantages and drawbacks have to be considered in choosing one or another technique. In the past, US was used in tumour follow-up to detect tumour recurrences, however these studies didn't use high-resolution transducers and the timing of imaging respect to surgery was not defined. The recent advances in transducer technology improved the diagnostic capabilities of US. For the evaluation of limbs soft-tissue masses, US is widely used as a first level modality. The reasons are that US is widely available, fast, easily repeatable and often more accessible than CT and MR Imaging. In addition, US equipped with high-frequency transducers have a spatial resolution that may be comparable or higher than that of MR Imaging and CT in the evaluation of superficial soft-tissues. US and MR Imaging are often not able to differentiate benign from malignant tumours, therefore several lesions detected with US or MR Imaging warrant biopsy. The clinical practice guidelines of the ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology) published in 2010 found that there are no published data to indicate the optimal routine follow-up policy of surgically treated patients with localized disease. Moreover, it has not been demonstrated that, for limb sarcomas recurrences, MR Imaging is superior and cost-effective compared to US for the assessment of the primary site. Considering that surgically treated intermediate-/high-grade patient may be followed frequently, even every 3-4 months in the first 2-3 years and considering that performing US is easier than having MR Imaging, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US in the detection of local recurrences of adults patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the limb.

RATIONALE: Collecting and storing samples of tumor tissue from patients with soft tissue sarcoma to test in the laboratory may help the study of cancer in the future. PURPOSE: This laboratory is collecting tissue samples from patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the arms, hands, legs, or feet treated on clinical trial CRUK-VORTEX.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate patients with refractory childhood sarcomas, who have been treated with a combination therapy of trabectedin and irinotecan (within compassionate use), to determine, if this is a promising treatment option with acceptable toxicity and if the results warrant a prospective study.

This study is about preparing people with cancerous tumours, soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), in the leg to recover more quickly from surgery. Prehabilitation or "surgery school" is done before surgery while undergoing other cancer-related treatments. To test this idea, two groups will be formed. One group will have the prehabilitation program and the other group will have the same amount of attention from the research team who will visit them at the time of the radiotherapy sessions to provide support and any information they may need.The results of the study will indicate whether it is a good idea to conduct a bigger study that would involve many centres in Canada.

Investigators will determine whether MRSI using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate provide useful information of tumor malignancy in MRI-indeterminate cases. Metabolite maps of hyperpolarized [1-13C]lactate and H13CO3- produced from hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate will be compared to the biopsy results of MRI-indeterminate patients and the 13C-maps of age-matched healthy subjects.

Primary Objectives: To classify the types of wound healing complications that occur after pre-operative radiation therapy and limb sparing resection for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. To evaluate the impact of each complication type on patient function and quality of life using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).

A multicenter, open-label expanded access program to provide access to tazemetostat to Epithelioid Sarcoma (ES) patients in serious need who are otherwise unable to participate in a clinical study or whom access is not available through marketed product in the US.

Patients with a diagnosis listed under "conditions" below are eligible to be considered for the EAP. These conditions must be serious or life-threatening at the time of enrollment and appropriate, comparable, or satisfactory alternative treatments must have been tried without clinical success. Patients with conditions not listed under "conditions" below are not eligible for the tazemetostat EAP.