Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal"

The objectives of this study is to demonstrate bioequivalence (comparable safety and efficacy) of the Test product to the Reference in the treatment of subjects seasonal allergic rhinitis.

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy of administering a probiotic in adult human subjects suffering from allergic rhinitis during seasonal grass pollen exposure.

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the effect of administering a probiotic strain on allergic symptoms and immune parameters (Th-2 cytokines, effector cells) in seasonal allergic rhinitis subjects.

gpASIT+TM product is based on highly purified allergen fragments obtained from grass pollen. The purpose of this clinical trial is to confirm the safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity of increasing doses of gpASIT+TM administered subcutaneously to patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and to determine the maximal tolerated dose of gpASIT+TM .

The study will compare the safety and efficacy of a generic mometasone nasal spray to the reference listed drugs in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations will be tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.

This is an efficacy and safety study of desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The primary hypothesis of this study is that the change from Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) is improved by desloratadine compared to placebo.

To investigate the immunologic effects and safety of 60-day treatment of the Standardized Quality units (SQ) grass Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablet in adult subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

This is a clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a bepotastine besilate-corticosteroid combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in an open exposure study with subjects who have a demonstrated history of Mountain Cedar pollen allergy. The primary study objective is to assess the reduction from baseline in averaged morning (AM) and evening (PM) values of reflective total nasal symptom scores for each of 3 nasal sprays (bepotastine besilate-fluticasone propionate combination nasal spray, bepotastine besilate nasal spray, fluticasone propionate nasal spray) compared to placebo nasal spray. For enrolled subjects, the study will involve a 7-10 day run-in screening period dosing with placebo nasal spray and then a 14-day treatment period where subjects will dose twice a day with 1 of the 4 test agent nasal sprays and record reflective and instantaneous scores for both nasal and ocular symptoms prior to each dosing.

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of bepotastine besilate nasal product in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients.

This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.