Active clinical trials for "Peritonitis"

An intraperitoneal implanted catheter is always necessary to perform Peritoneal Dialysis. Catheter insertion has been associated with infectious complication such as Exit Site Infection (ESI), Tunnel Infection and Peritonitis. The last one may lead to loss of the technique because the need of catheter removal. Most of international guidelines recommends the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Different protocols has been used, mostly intravenous single injection before the procedure. For the last 25 years our unit gives a single intraperitoneal dose of Cefazolin immediately after the catheter insertion. The aim of this study is compare the effect of a pre- operative IV dose os Cefazolin with a post- procedure intraperitoneal single dose administration of the same drug.

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of rifaximin versus norfloxacin for secondary prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites.

Patients undergoing emergency surgery for peritonitis are at increased risk of abdominal wall-related complications. In patients with peritonitis the risk of incisional hernia (IH) is extremely elevated. The incidence of IH in patients operated with peritonitis is up to 54 %, compared with an incidence of 11-26 % in the general surgical population. Moreover, up to 24.1 % of patients with peritonitis undergoing emergency laparotomy may develop fascial dehiscence. The evaluation of quality of life of patients with IH showed lower mean scores on physical components of health-related quality of life and body image. The prophylactic mesh implantation demonstrated to reduce the incisional hernia rate in patients undergoing vascular or bariatric procedures. However, the intraperitoneal non absorbable mesh implantation in infected fields is generally considered at least of doubtful safety because of the theoretical increased risk of chronic mesh infection and enterocutaneous fistula. Most incisional hernias develop during the first three months after surgery, which represents the critical period for the healing of transected muscular and fibrous layers of the abdominal wall. However, most studies recommended a long-term follow up period of up to at least 5 years for midline abdominal incisions to determine the real incisional hernia rate. The midline abdominal incision is preferred in abdominal surgery, as it provides wide and rapid access compared other incisions. However, the incidence of incisional hernias is higher following midline abdominal incisions than in other abdominal incisions. In emergency surgery the midline incision in the majority of cases is a necessity. Several factors affect the process of wound healing: surgical site infection, poor surgical technique, and patient-related factors (i.e. peritonitis, old age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies, hepatic cirrhosis, jaundice, renal impairment, malignancy, cardiac disease, chest problems, previous abdominal incisions, steroid therapy). Data about the use of biological prosthesis in infected fields are scarce and derive principally from case reports and case series. However, indications about their use and usefulness in infected fields have been recently published by the Italian Biological Prosthesis Working Group (IBPWG). A previously published prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of implantation of biological prosthesis in high risk patients in order to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia. This study suggested the efficacy of this kind of prosthesis in reducing incisional hernia rate in patients with multiple risk factors. A recently published meta-analysis showed as the use of biological prosthesis in ventral hernia repair resulted in a lower infectious wound complication rate but in an similar recurrence rate. These results supports the application of biological prosthesis in high risk patients. One recent systematic review evaluated the positive effect on incisional hernia rate of the prophylactic mesh positioning in high risk patients. No randomized trials have been published since now about the use of biological prosthesis in contaminated or infected fields. The rationale of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of swine dermal collagen prosthesis implanted preperitoneally as a prophylactic procedure against incisional hernia in patients operated in urgency/emergency setting in contaminated/infected fields with peritonitis. The aim of the study is to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia from 50% to 20%.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based dialysis therapy and peritonitis is a serious complication in PD. A reliable point-of-care test to detect peritonitis is important for patients to self-detect peritonitis at home as delayed diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis will translate to poor outcomes in PD patients. The study aims to examine the effectiveness of Periplex®, point-of-care test, in the diagnosis of peritonitis in PD patients.

The study aims to compare the potential benefit of allopurinol versus atorvastatin in reducing the risk of developing cirrhosis-related complications, delaying the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma, and improving survival. Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate their impact on parents' related quality of life.

This study aims to determine if the CloudCath device can detect infections related to peritoneal dialysis (peritonitis) as fast or faster than the current standard methods used by patients and doctors to detect such infections.

For many patients peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the preferred form of dialysis to treat kidney disease as it provides greater flexibility and the ability to dialyse at home. However, PD use in Australia has been decreasing over the last 10 years. A big reason for this drop is the risk of infection. The best way to prevent PD related infections is to make sure that patients have good training in PD techniques. The researchers of this study have developed TEACH-PD, a new education package for training both PD nurses and PD patients. The aim of this study is to find out whether TEACH-PD training reduces the number of PD related infections.

Hospitals, and more specifically Intensive Care Units (ICU), face the challenging issue of emergence and rapid spread of multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR). In some cases, the therapeutic choice is extremely limited. Prevention and adequacy of antibiotic therapy (AB) are the key responses applied toward these threats. A delayed adequate AB is a known factor of poor prognosis. Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are frequent, polymicrobial and life threatening diseases. Source control and adequate AB are instrumental issues in this setting. Despite technical advances, susceptibility testing of the microorganisms collected from peritoneal samples is not usually available before day two or three after surgery. In this time lapse, empiric AB might be inadequate (not targeting all the pathogens, which leads to a prolonged duration of AB and potential increased morbidity/mortality risk) or too broad (with the two issues of ecology with an increased risk of selection of MDR bacteria and additional costs). In a pilot study evaluating the potential benefit of a direct culture of peritoneal samples from resuscitation patients treated for peritonitis, we observed that conventional treatment made it possible to obtain microbiological results within a median of 3 [extremes 2-7] days whereas a direct microbiological technique by E-test gave results in 1 [1-2] days (p <0.0001). With this technique close to conventional microbiological, a change in antibiotic therapy could have been achieved within an average of 1 [1-2] days versus 4 [1-11] days with conventional management (p = 0, 0006). The development of modern molecular techniques suggests that a large margin of improvement for the rendering and the precision of the results is possible.

The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) compared with primary closure (PC) in surgical site infection (SSI) prevention for laparotomy for peritonitis.

Norfloxacin versus Norfloxacin with Itopride in Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis