Active clinical trials for "Sepsis"

Prospective, experimental, longitudinal cohort study in septic patients treated at ER and ICU at General Hospital Zone 11 IMSS Piedras Negras Coahuila. Interventions, will be implementd in 2 consecutive periods of 6 months Phase 1: 6 months period, septic patients treated only with standard treatment. Phase 2: 6 months period, septic patients treated with Vitamin C, Thiamine, Cyanocobalamine, Pyridoxine and Hydrocortisone + standard treatment.

This is an open label phase II study of treatment with LEAF-4L6715 in patients who experience severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19, Sepsis or other Causes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the improvement in PaO2/FiO2 by more than 25% in patients treated with LEAF-4L6715.

This is an observational prospective multicentre study on patients attending the emergency department and suspected to have sepsis. Blood markers characteristic of a Cellular Reprogramming (CR) signature and predicting severe sepsis and organ failure will be measured and validated.

This study seeks to determine the the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence, characteristics, management and outcome of patients admitted to U.S. hospitals with non-COVID-19 related sepsis.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate if ART-123 given to patients who have severe sepsis can decrease mortality.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a 3-hour protocol utilizing non-invasive hemodynamic optimization treatment strategy results in better outcome and lower hospital costs in patients who present with severe bloodstream infections to the Emergency Department (ED).

Sepsis is a common inflammatory response to infection characterized by hypovolemia and vasodilation for which early administration of intravenous fluids has been suggested to improve outcomes. The ideal fluid balance following initial resuscitation is unclear. Septic patients treated in the intensive care unit commonly receive significant volumes of intravenous fluids with resultant positive fluid balance for up to a week after their initial resuscitation. Observational studies have associated fluid receipt and positive fluid balance in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock with increased mortality but are inherently limited by indication bias. In order to determine the optimal approach to fluid management following resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, a randomized controlled trial is needed. The primary hypothesis of this study is that, compared to usual care, a conservative approach to fluid management after resuscitation in patients with sepsis and cardiopulmonary dysfunction will increase intensive care unit free days.

This study will directly compare meropenem with standard first line antibiotic therapies in subjects entering an ICU with secondary nosocomial sepsis, or who contract sepsis while resident in an ICU.

Investigators propose to investigate the use of IV vitamins B1 and C in a randomized, double-blinded, prospective trial to determine if these medications decrease mortality rates in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Despite evidence of the physiologic benefits and possible lower mortality associated with low chloride solutions, normal saline remains the most wildly used fluid in the world. Given uncertainty about the impact of lower chloride versus higher chloride solutions on mortality, it is unlikely that clinical practice will change without new and direct RCT evidence. Editorials published in leading critical care journals have called for RCT's to address this important clinical question. The proposed feasibility RCT will investigate the feasibility of a large-scale trial directly comparing low chloride versus normal chloride for resuscitation in septic shock on patient-important outcomes such as mortality and AKI.