Active clinical trials for "Sepsis"

This clinical study designed as a prospective, open labelled, multi-centre, RCT will be carried out to evaluate if direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized fiber column (PMX) is superior to conventional medical therapy for sepsis, for patients with sepsis arising from abdominal cavity infection, accompanied by the failure of one or more organs. 120 patients (60 treatment/60 control) will be considered in this study. Those patients fulfilling inclusion criteria and not having exclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of two study groups. One group will be treated with PMX (PMX group) and the other will receive a "standard therapy" for sepsis (control group). All patients will receive full intensive care management, including fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, antimicrobial chemotherapy, ventilatory support, and renal replacement therapy, if required. Each patient will be followed up for 28 days after study entry.

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is equivalence between two different methods of treating patients with severe bloodstream infection called sepsis. We will randomly assign patients to one of two treatment methods. One of the treatment methods is the current standard of care and uses an infrared sensor on the end of a catheter to determine the adequacy of treatment. The second treatment method is identical to the first but instead of the infrared sensor a blood test that is performed as a part of standard care (with blood drawn from the catheter) will be used to determine the adequacy of treatment. This study will attempt to determine an easier method of guiding treatment.

Sepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients in the United States. It develops in approximately 750,000 Americans annually, and more than 210,000 of them die. Despite improvements in supportive treatment, mortality has changed very little, and until recently, no sepsis-specific treatments were available. Protease inhibitors have seemed to have an immune benefit that extends beyond their ability to prevent HIV replication. T cells in those patients treated with protease inhibitors have reduced rates of death than in those patients not receiving therapy.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether immunoadsorption of LPS, Il-6 and C5a reduces systemic hyperinflammation, improves immune function and improves organ function in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock

The goal of this study is to verify whether extensive flushing of the port catheter in patients with catheter related blood stream infection will lead to correct vancomycin trough levels, taken via the port catheter and compared with simultaneously taken peripheral samples.

This phase II trial studies how well early metabolic resuscitation therapy works in reducing multi-organ dysfunction in patients with septic shock. Early metabolic resuscitation is made of large doses of glucose, protein, and essential metabolic molecules that may help lower the effects of septic shock on the body. Giving patients early metabolic resuscitation in combination with standard of care may work better in reducing multi-organ dysfunction syndrome in patients with septic shock compared to standard of care alone.

Sepsis is the body's response to a life-threatening infection. This study will determine if zinc supplementation is safe to use in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. This study will also gather preliminary information to evaluate the impact that zinc has on the immune system (the body's defense system against infection) and whether zinc can help monocytes and macrophages (specific types of cells that remove infections from the body) work more effectively.

Despite early goal-directed maintenance of normal macrocirculation, the reduction of 60-day mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock remained unsatisfied (56.9% to 44.3%). One of the major causes of high mortality is microcirculatory dysfunction. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of microcirculatory dysfunction may cause tissue hypoperfusion and resulted in multiple organ dysfunction and death. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist which exhibits sedative and analgesic effects. Recent studies suggest that dexmedetomidine also has anti-coagulation and anti-inflammatory effects, and it can reduce the mortality of endotoxemic rats and patients with severe sepsis. The investigators will conduct two animal studies and one clinical trial to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on microcirculatory dysfunction and organ injury in rat with endotoxemia and patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Sixty patients with severe sepsis and septic shock will be enrolled and randomized to control group or dexmedetomidine group. In the control group, the patients will be treated according to the clinical practice guideline. If sedation is required, non-dexmedetomidine sedative agents will be used. In the dexmedetomidine group, the patients will be treated according to the clinical practice guideline, and they will also receive continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (infusion rate ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 mcg/kg/h) for 24 hours as needed. The sublingual microcirculation, serum level of Endocan, NGAL(Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin), and BNP(B-type natriuretic peptide) will be examined at preset time points up to 24 hours. The vital signs, hemodynamic parameters, and survival of 28-day and 90-day will be recorded and analyzed.

Randomised trial comparing the efficacy and feasibility of using a sterile closing pack to reduce postpartum sepsis

The administration of fluids intravenously is the first step in the stabilization of patients in septic shock. It is important to give the right dose of fluids, enough to improve the function of the cardiovascular system but not too much to drown the cells in water. In order to know that, the investigators use the "fluid challenge" which is the administration of a "small amount" of fluid in a short period of time in order to test the cardiovascular response to a dose of fluids. However, it is unclear how "small" this amount can be. The aim of this study is to find out the minimum volume required to perform an effective "fluid challenge". The investigators hypothesize that the changes in the mean pressure in the cardiovascular system (socalled mean systemic filling pressure or Pmsf) during the administration of small amounts of fluid can be used to detect the minimum volume required to effectively test the cardiovascular system with a fluid challenge. On the other hand, microcirculation may remain impaired despite the stabilization of the macrocirculation. The microcirculation can be much more dynamic than the macrocriculation, so it is essential to observe the changes of both over time. Patients admitted at the investigators' intensive care unit (ICU) due to sepsis can be included in this study. The sample will be divided in 4 groups according to the volume of the fluid challenge: 2 ml/kg, 3 ml/kg, 4ml/Kg and 5 ml/kg. The investigators will measure the Pmsf non-invasively using a pneumatic tourniquet inflated during one minute. Invasive arterial blood pressure will be observed during the inflation of the cuff in the arm to determine the Pmsf. The least significant change of Pmsf using this method is 14%. The minimal volume will be that one that achieve that change in Pmsf.