Active clinical trials for "Sepsis"

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as an inflammatory index, is cheap and easy to obtain, and could be widely used in hospitals at all levels. NLR is a valuable biomarker that is significantly correlated with the status of immune and inflammatory responses. In the past few years, NLR has been continuously and extensively explored in various diseases, and the research progress is considerable. In cardiovascular disease, NLR can predict arrhythmia and short - and long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. NLR may be associated with heart failure and valvular heart disease. Moreover, NLR has been shown to be associated with respiratory diseases (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus), and digestive diseases (acute appendicitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver fibrosis, and cirrhosis). Importantly, the study of NLR in sepsis has received much attention in recent years. A 2019 meta-analysis concluded that peripheral white blood cell ratios, including NLR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are associated with clinical outcomes in sepsis and are useful biomarkers of infection. They recommended that NLR be evaluated in future hierarchical models, To clarify its relationship with NLR and clinical outcome and the prognostic value of NLR, it is worth mentioning that NLR has also been found to have the ability to predict the outcome of sepsis. It has been shown that NLR, together with other inflammatory parameters, might be a marker for early detection of sepsis in the intensive care unit. However, a large body of evidence demonstrating the association between NLR and adverse clinical outcomes in sepsis remains controversial. Another study concluded that "no association was found between NLR and 28-day in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis". In addition, the reliability of NLR on admission in predicting the prognosis of critical illness was also lower than that of traditional markers (including CRP, PCT, serum lactic acid and APACHEⅡ score). This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the early predictive value of inflammation-related parameters in-hospital mortality of septic patients.

Background: Nearly all the yearly 3.3 million neonatal deaths occur in low and middle income countries. Infections, including those affecting the umbilical cord (omphalitis) are a significant factor in approximately a third of these deaths. In fact, the odds of all-cause mortality are 46% higher among infants with umbilical cord infection than those without infection. Five large randomized controlled trials in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa have examined the effect of multiple applications (for at least 7 days) of 4% chlorhexidine (CHX) on the umbilical cord on omphalitis and neonatal death. These studies show a consitent positive effect of multiple applications on omphalitis but not on neonatal mortality. Whereas there is mounting evidence for the effect of 7 day chlorhexidine application, there is no data from Africa and only one study from Asia that examines the effect of a single application of CHX as soon as possible after birth. In this single Asian study, CHX led to a reduction in the risk of mild-moderate omphalitis and neonatal death. It is important, in an African setting to explore the effect of a single application, which is programmatically much simpler to implement than daily application for 7 days. Therefore, the investigators' study will compare umbilical cord cleansing with a single application of 4% chlorhexidine at birth with dry cord care in both community and facility births on omphalitis and severe illness in the neonatal period. Methods: The chlorhexidine study is a community based, individually randomised controlled trial conducted on 4,760 mother-infant pairs in Uganda. The primary outcomes are severe illness and umbilical cord infection (omphalitis). Severe illness is defined as any illness associated with at least one of the following danger signs observed by study research assistants: inability to drink or breastfeed or (a history of) convulsions, lethargy or unconsciousness, vomiting of all feeds, and/or results in hospitalization and/or results in death. Discussion: This study will provide novel evidence, from a Sub-Saharan African setting of the effect of umbilical cord cleansing with a single application of 4% chlorhexidine at birth in both community and facility births.

Examination of ADMA (Asymmetric-Dimethylarginine)-serum level and DDAH II (Dimethylarginine Dimethylaminohydrolase)- Polymorphism in patients with severe Sepsis and septic shock as prognostic value. This study looks into ADMA as a good prognostic factor for sepsis. Further more the dependency of the ADMA level to the DDAH II polymorphisms is reviewed this study.

This randomized phase III trial studies chlorhexidine gluconate cleansing to see how well it works compared to control cleansing in preventing central line associated bloodstream infection and acquisition of multi-drug resistant organisms in younger patients with cancer or undergoing donor stem cell transplant. Chlorhexidine gluconate may help reduce bloodstream infections and bacterial infections associated with the central line.

The study has 2 phases: The Retrospective Phase (50 patients were diagnosed to have sepsis according to our definition and criteria and 30 patients as a controlled cases ) The Prospective Phase (600 patients who will be admitted and monitored in ICU in order to get at least 30 sepsis cases, according to our definition and criteria). Measurements will be made from the forehead using the TTP's biocompatible sensor Unit that will be attached to the skin. The SU will transfer data to the MCU.

Progranulin blood concentrations in patients with sepsis will be analysed in relation to disease status in order to validate progranulin as a biomarker for sepsis. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery will serve as controls.

Is HMGB1 (High Mobility Group Box 1) elevated in sepsis patients for weeks after recovery from severe sepsis/septic shock, similar to what has been observed in mice? Do patients recovering from severe sepsis/septic shock suffer from cognitive impairment and is such impairment associated with prolonged HMGB1 levels in plasma? Is there a difference from patients recovering from critical illness without prior sepsis?

Sepsis and severe malaria together contribute to an estimated 13 million deaths annually, a great burden of which is in low-income countries. Optimal fluid management is critical yet remains one of the most challenging clinical care elements as volume overload precipitates pulmonary edema and volume restriction may exacerbate acute kidney injury. These complications of sepsis and severe malaria significantly increase mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings lacking mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy. Point-of-care ultrasound and passive leg raise testing are two easily implementable, safe and non-invasive clinical bedside fluid assessment tools that could be applied towards developing a fluid management algorithm in low resource settings. Similarly, simple tissue perfusion measures can facilitate understanding of precise indications or contraindication to fluid and vasopressor therapy. However, the performance of these tools has yet to be confirmed in these settings. Accurate assessment of pulmonary tolerance and fluid responsive patients could aid to tailor vasopressor and fluid therapy to the patient condition and disease phase, thus preventing or detecting iatrogenic pulmonary edema and other pulmonary complications. As there is currently limited evidence supporting fluid management recommendations for severe malaria and sepsis in low-resource settings, the potential application of these management tools could optimize supportive therapy and improve outcomes in these populations. The main activity proposed is a prospective, observational study of patients with sepsis and severe malaria to describe the relationship between fluid therapy and vasopressor therapy against measures of tissue perfusion and pulmonary congestion in adult patients with severe malaria or severe sepsis. In addition, the study will assess the performance of simple bedside clinical tools assessing fluid responsiveness, pulmonary congestion and peripheral tissue perfusion. The data from this observational study will facilitate the preparation of a follow-up study to test a clinical algorithm to guide individualized fluid and vasopressor administration.

To determine the effect of Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology II as a Predictor of Mortality and Organ Dysfunction in Neonates with Septicemia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units at CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, CAIRO UNIVERSITY and at ELGALAA Children's MILITARY HOSPITAL.

Although advances in neonatal care have improved survival and reduced complications in preterm infants, sepsis still contributes significantly to mortality and in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), in particular for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) and extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW, <1000g). Based on the timing of the infection neonatal sepsis has been classified into early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset sepsis (LOS), with differences in the mode of transmission and predominant organisms. EOS is defined as onset in the first 3 days of life generally due to vertical transmission of bacteria from mothers to infants during the intrapartum period. LOS occurs after 3 days of life and it is attributed to pathogens acquired postnatally (horizontal transmission). Considering generally neonatal sepsis in Europe, 90% of the responsible bacteria resulted to be: Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, e Listeria monocytogenes. The diagnosis is difficult because clinical signs, particularly early in the course of disease, are subtle and nonspecific, and laboratory tests and blood culture are not always reliable. Moreover. blood culture (considered the 'gold standard) takes 48-72 hours for result. In fact the cultural method requires the presence of living and vital germs, depends on the volume of the sample - serious problem in neonatal population -, several hours are needed to process the sample, possibly resulting falsely negative in subjects undergoing concomitant antibiotic treatment or a false positive result can be found by contamination. The method based on molecular biology does not require living germs and, therefore, is not characterised by the sensitivity limitations. Such method can result to be extremely effective in patients receiving antibiotic therapy. In the present study, when an infant has to undergone blood sample for bacteria culture to verify a possible sepsis, a residual blood (200µl) is processed in the same time using a kit based on molecular biology. This kit is designed to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity in the determination of most invasive bacterial diseases (meningitis, sepsis, pneumonia, etc.) affecting full-term, preterm infants to determine any presence of bacterial DNA belonging to all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes. The target bacteria have been chosen on the basis of the current Italian epidemiological context, so as to include germs causing about 90% of the meningitis/sepsis cases among the neonatal population. The detection system can unmistakably identify the germ against which it is directed and without causing any cross-reaction with other germs or human DNA.. The results obtained with this method have demonstrated a 100% specificity (no false positive result) The sensitivity of this method compared with the cultural method has turned out to be twice as high. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of the blood culture method and the kit for molecular detection of bacterial DNA (all serotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Listeria monocytogenes) considering the relevant epidemiology of our NICU, in order to verify the relative frequency of sepsis (EOS and LOS) caused by the target bacteria on the whole frequency of the bacteria responsible of all the sepsis in our ward.