Active clinical trials for "Sepsis"

This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm study designed to assess the safety and performance of the Pristine™ Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter.

Purpose/Objectives: Severe sepsis and septic shock are a common cause of new onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in the intensive care unit. Development of NOAF in this setting can prolong length of stay and increase mortality. Amiodarone is the most commonly used agent used in this setting to control rate and rhythm. However, limited data exist detailing appropriate dosing in this setting. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate two amiodarone dosing strategies, a full loading dose versus a partial loading dose, in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) due to severe sepsis or septic shock to assess the mean heart rate every 6 hours after initiation of amiodarone infusion to day 7 or death. Research Design/Plan: Consecutive patients admitted to the medical or cardiac intensive care unit at University Hospital with NOAF in the setting of severe sepsis or septic shock will be screened for study inclusion. Data will be collected and stored using Microsoft Excel or Access and analyzed with JMP 12.0 and SPSS. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older who develop new-onset atrial fibrillation in the setting of severe sepsis or septic shock and in whom the medical team deems appropriate to initiate amiodarone therapy in will be considered for study inclusion. Patients will receive intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) amiodarone, as per the standard of care. Patients will be randomized to a certain quantitative loading dose strategy; either a full loading dose (≥ 5g IV or ≥10g PO +/- 20%) or a partial loading dose (<4g IV or < 8g PO). Clinical Relevance: With intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) and mortality being twice as high in NOAF with sepsis as compared to septic patients without NOAF, the investigators ultimately aim to identify a management strategy that may minimize this morbidity and mortality while also minimizing exposure to a drug that may cause serious adverse effects.

This Randomized, pragmatic, multicentric with blinding of patients and health professionals, intention-to-treat analysis has by primary endpoint to evaluate whether the aspirin use reduces the intensity of organic dysfunction measured by the variation of the SOFA score starting from the day of admission to the seventh day. Secundary endpoint: To evaluate if the aspirin use reduces the time of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital. In addition, to evaluate the safety of its administration regarding the occurrence of bleeding. The data will be collected directly from the chart of the patients admitted to the ICU. Data quality assurance will be made through periodic verification, aiming for complete and consistent data. The centers will receive periodic reports for adequacy of potentially inconsistent or incomplete data. The baseline SOFA of patients with sepsis is 8.8 with a standard deviation of 3. The expected reduction in the control group in the SOFA at day 7 is 2 points. Considering a power of 80% and a level of significance of 0.05, it is estimated that 109 patients will be needed in each group. A total of 218 patients will compose the sample. All analyzes will follow the intention-to-treat principle. We will evaluate the effect of aspirin compared to placebo on primary and binary outcomes by means of relative risks, 95% confidence intervals and chi-square tests. For continuous outcomes with normal distribution, we will present the mean difference, 95% confidence interval and P value calculated by t test. For continuous outcomes with asymmetric distribution, we will perform Wilcoxon test.

The purpose of this study is to determine if Selective Adsorption System for Removal of Bacterial Toxins (S.A.F.E.BT) therapy is effective in the treatment of severe sepsis.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an additional physical therapy program can improve the mobility and functional outcomes of patients diagnosed with severe sepsis (an illness in which the body has a severe response to bacteria or other germs and develops worsened function of a major organ such as the kidneys, heart, or lungs).

No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yet been performed comparing different treatment options for AmpC or ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. During the last 10 years we have seen an exponentially increasing rate of carbapenem resistance worldwide, including Australia and New Zealand. The investigators urgently need data from well-designed RCTs to guide clinicians in the treatment of antibiotic resistant Gram-negative infections. The investigators face a situation where a commonly used antibiotic for these infections (meropenem) may be driving carbapenem resistance. For this reason, the investigators are seeking to compare a carbapenem-sparing regimen with a carbapenem for the treatment of these infections. Formal evaluation of safety and efficacy of generic antibiotics in the treatment of infection is of immense clinical and public health importance, and no formal trial has yet been conducted to address these issues. The international collaboration between teams of clinician researchers, some of whom are leaders in their field, makes it highly likely that the outcomes of this trial will have a significant impact on clinical practice. The investigators' hypothesis is that piperacillin/tazobactam (a carbapenem-sparing regimen) is non-inferior to meropenem (a widely used carbapenem) for the definitive treatment of bloodstream infections due to third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible E. coli or Klebsiella species.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether BMS-936559 is safe and has the desired pharmacologic activity in patients who have severe sepsis.

Enterobacterales resistant to carbapenem are cause of severe concern in hospital-acquired infections since therapeutic options are limited. Recently approved drugs, such as bela-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor, have been the drug of choice. However, its use is limited in low- and middle-income countries. Thus, therapy of these infections mostly relies on polymyxins and other old drugs. The role of adjuvant carbapenem therapy in combination with polymyxins, aminoglycosides and other drugs is under investigation. From a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), there is an elevated probability that high-dose, extended infusion administered meropenem reach the PK/PD target of 40% above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen when the MIC is 32mg/L or lower (non-susceptible isolates have MICs of 4mg/L or higher). However, the MIC is not routinely determined in clinical laboratories. In addition, high-level (above 32mg/L) resistance to carbapenems have been reported in many studies. This open-label, randomized clinical trial aim to assess if the addition of meropenem to the best available therapy can increase the number of days alive and free of hospitalization in patients with bloodstream infections by Enterobacterales with MIC of meropenem above 32mg/L.

The primary objective of this trial is to determine the safety and efficacy of IV fish oil doses of 0.20 g/kg and 0.50 g/kg, compared to a control group, in critically ill patients with severe sepsis by examining organ function, blood safety and biochemical parameters, markers of systemic inflammation and innate immunological parameters

The primary objective of the study is to explore the efficacy and safety of ATryn® (antithrombin alfa) for the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) associated with severe sepsis, when administered by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over five days.