Active clinical trials for "Sepsis"

Study Hypothesis Enhancement of Th-1 response with the help of a poly TLR agonist (Mw) is likely to increase survival in patients with severe sepsis. Objectives To study whether immunomodulation with Mycobacterium Mw helps in improving survival and the recovery of organ function in patients with severe sepsis. This will be assessed with the help of the following Mortality in the two arms Daily SOFA scores Ventilator free days Time-to-vasopressor withdrawal ICU length of stay Hospital length of stay METHODS This will be a proof of the concept study to assess the effect of Mycobacterium w in combination with standard therapy versus standard therapy alone on the inflammatory profile in sepsis due to gram negative infection. A total of 25 patients will be enrolled in each group. The patients will be randomized in balance to receive either test drug or its placebo along with the standard of care

This study wants to compared the safety and efficacy of GDTs using standard pressure-related parameters vs. dynamic hemodynamic indices associated with fluid compartment monitoring, in septic patients requiring emergency surgery.

The primary aim of this study is to assess the effects of adjunctive therapy with Interferon (IFN)-gamma on immune function in patients with septic shock in a placebo-controlled manner. Moreover, the investigators want to evaluate new markers that could be used to identify patients with immunoparalysis, and to monitor the patient's immunological response to IFN-γ. In addition, mechanistic studies will be performed to further elucidate mechanisms (such as epigenetic modifications) behind immunoparalysis and the effects of IFN-γ on these mechanisms. With use of the results the investigators will obtain in this pilot study, the investigators will conduct a large multicentre clinical trial with IFN-γ.

Background: Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective arfa2-adrenergic agonist, is known to be a unique sedative agent which causes less acute tolerance, drug addiction and withdrawal compared with gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) agonists. Dexmedetomidine was approved for short-term ICU sedation in 2004 in Japan, and it has been used particularly for surgical ICU patients. In August 2010 dexmedetomidine was approved in Japan for sedation lasting more than 24 hours. Recent evidence demonstrated that dexmedetomidine has organ protective effects including neuroprotection, cardioprotection, renal protection, gastrointestinal tract action, and anti-inflammatory action. Dexmedetomidine was shown to significantly decrease the infarct size in isolated rat hearts. Additionally, dexmedetomidine exhibited a preconditioning effect against ischemic injury in hippocampal slices, and this result was considered an apoptosis suppression effect of dexmedetomidine. Aydin C et al reported that dexmedetomidine enhanced the spontaneous contractions of the ileum in peritonitis rats compared with propofol and midazolam. Taniguchi and colleagues demonstrated that dexmedetomidine reduced high mortality rates and the plasma cytokine concentrations, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha in endotoxemic rats. A meta-analysis has shown that perioperative alfa2-adrenergic agonists, including dexmedetomidine infusion, decreased cardiovascular events on patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Dexmedetomidine treated patients undergoing thoracotomy indicated increase in urine output, reduction in serum creatinine, and the suppression of diuretics in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Septic patients receiving dexmedetomidine had improved 28-day mortality rates compared with septic patients receiving lorazepam in a sub-group analysis of MENDS randomized controlled trial. These positive effects of dexmedetomidine on the cardiovascular system, neurons, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract action, and an anti-inflammatory action, are expected to improve mortality in septic patients. However, large clinical research studies have not been conducted yet. We designed and conducted the DESIRE trial (DExmedetomidine for Sepsis in ICU Randomized Evaluation trial) to test a hypothesis that dexmedetomidine may improve clinical outcome and has these organ protective effects on septic patients. Objective: To determine whether dexmedetomidine improves clinical outcome and has organ protective effects on septic patients.

Approximately 444 subjects who are greater than or equal to 18 to 95 years of age, are non-pregnant, and are in the inpatient setting of one of the study sites will be evaluated to treatment efficacy. Analysis will include subjects with bloodstream infection (BSI) or pneumonia due to at least one of the following gram-negative bacilli organisms: Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella spp, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp. and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa that demonstrates in vitro non-susceptibility defined as extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (XDR-GNB) which includes XDR-AB, XDR-PA and CRE. If a subject has both BSI and pneumonia at the time of study enrollment, they will be included as a subject with pneumonia. Objectives: Primary: •Determine whether the treatment regimen of Colistimethate sodium (colistin) combined with a carbapenem (imipenem or meropenem) is associated with a decreased risk for mortality compared to colistin alone for subjects with bloodstream infection (BSI) and/or pneumonia due to XDR-GNB. Secondary: •Determine what treatment regimen (colistin monotherapy or colistin combined with a carbapenem (imipenem or meropenem) is more likely to reduce the emergence of colistin resistance among XDR-GNB isolates during therapy.

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effects (good and bad) of supplementation with Glutamine to that of a placebo (L-alanine), on your child and their Short Bowel Syndrome. Researchers are doing this study to see if the addition of Glutamine to oral/tube feeding (nutrition therapy) will work better by preventing bloodstream infections, improving growth, and/or changing the make-up of bacteria in your child's intestine. Glutamine is approved by the FDA for use in adults with Short Bowel Syndrome. In this study, the investigators will be assessing how well Glutamine affects Short Bowel Syndrome in children.

This is a randomized, open label study to evaluate the Initial Specimen Diversion Device (ISDD) in reducing the contamination rate in blood culture analysis. Blood culture data will be derived from inpatient and/or outpatient settings in a variety of hospital departments (e.g. ER, surgical, medical, etc.). Only samples that are collected via PIVC's may be included in this study. The ISDD will be compared to current laboratory practices for the collection of blood for culture purposes. Laboratory Standard Procedures (LSP) is defined as collection of venipuncture blood for culture without an initial diversion method to divert and sequester potential blood contaminants.

Patients with infections in their blood often become very sick. These patients are usually put in an intensive care unit for careful observation and treatment. These patients may develop a low blood pressure, lung failure, and kidney failure. When these problems develop, care becomes quite complicated. Patients with lung failure often need help with a breathing machine to make certain that the breathing is adequate. The machine helps keep the oxygen level high enough for healthy tissues. When patients are placed on the machine for breathing they require a tube to be placed into lungs. This can be quite uncomfortable. These patients need sedation to help them tolerate the uncomfortable breathing tube and other parts of their routine necessary care. This study will compare two drugs (dexmedetomidine and propofol) which are frequently used for sedation in intensive care patients. Clinical studies suggest that these drugs are both effective and safe. The main question is whether or not one of the drugs is better in a patient with a blood infection. This study will try to determine that. Our main goal is to see whether or not patients on one particular drug come off the breathing machine faster than patients on the other drug. These drugs are not experimental drugs and are approved by the Food and Drug Administration. There is no placebo drug being used in this study. All patients in this study will receive the best possible care based on their medical condition.

This study aims to improve the outcome of infants (<2 months) with severe sepsis and meningitis at the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi. Currently WHO recommends the treatment of infant severe sepsis and bacterial meningitis with 14 to 21 day course of penicillin and gentamicin as first line. The second line treatment is cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. Severe bacterial infections are common in infants under 2 months of age and the mortality is very high (~50%). There are several reasons for this; one is that the first line antibiotics used are no longer as effective as they used to be. Bacterial resistance to the first line antibiotics has increased and some infections especially of the central nervous system may only be partly treated and not eradicated by present therapy. First line treatment is cheap and available but requires 4 injections a day, for at least 14 days, a total of 58 injections. Many mothers find this number too much and abscond. The investigators second line therapy is ceftriaxone which is also available and cheap and the advantage of being given as a daily injection. The disadvantage is that it can cause (reversible) jaundice particularly in premature babies and it must not be given with calcium products. The investigators do not give calcium to the investigators infants as the investigators cannot routinely check electrolytes. All the most common causes of bacterial meningitis in this age group in the investigators setting are sensitive to ceftriaxone. The investigators wish to undertake an open randomized trial of penicillin and gentamicin v ceftriaxone as first line treatment for infant meningitis. The investigators are able to monitor for side effects. The investigators hypothesise that the ceftriaxone arm will have 20% less deaths that the penicillin and gentamicin group.

To collect clinical response data with the use of ertapenem in community acquired sepsis.