Active clinical trials for "Shock, Cardiogenic"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a left ventricular assist device in comparison to a standard treatment with an intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with cardiogenic shock due to left ventricular failure following an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction).

The purpose of this study is to gather information on patients who have heart failure and are eligible for one of the following two procedures: 1) mechanical support, i.e. ventricular assist device (VAD) or 2) heart transplant. the study seeks to determine which patient populations benefit from heart transplant or ventricular assist device. This will allow to offer the state-of-the-art care to the patients in heart failure.

This is a randomized, double blind, single center trial to study of the effects of Ivabradine vs. Placebo on patients hospitalized for Stage D heart failure (HF)/ and cardiogenic shock (CS) who will require continuous infusion of Dobutamine and have developed sinus tachycardia (ST) (heart rate >100 beats/min). The aim of the study will be to assess the potential of Ivabradine to slow ST and improve hemodynamics in patients with stage D HF/CS on Dobutamine treatment.

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of levosimendan with that of dobutamine in patients with unstable hemodynamics (shock).

Prevalence of cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome patients is reported at about 5-8% with high fatality. Revascularization approach has already known as the standard of care, but the usage of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as mechanical circulatory support is still a controversy. IABP SHOCK II trial revealed that short-term mortality did not improved by IABP but there are several essential variabels related to mortality that are not considered in the study which are IABP initiation time and weaning protocol.This study aim to evalute the effect of IABP prior to revascularization on mortality of patients with myocardial infarction complicated with shock. 92 subjects will be enrolled in this randomized controlled trial into two groups, with and without IABP. IABP group will be receiving the intervention prior to revascularization. The primary outcomes to be sought are in-hospital and 30-day mortality after revascularization. IABP effects measured by various indicators such as Global Longitudinal Strain by echocardiography on the 1st and 3rd day, NTproBNP and ST2 level on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day, effective lactate clearance and ureum creatinine level on the 1st and 3rd day and will be compared between two groups. Continous variabel will be presented in mean ± deviation standard or median, and analized with Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is of great value in supporting patients with cardiac shock. More than 80% ECMO patients will develop renal catastrophe that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is required. The evidence is conflict as to whether early CRRT improves outcomes. Early CRRT before a definite indication developed may prevent side effects of toxicity and fluid overload and therefore, bring survival benefit for the patient. This hypothesis need to be tested in RCT. Plasma catecholamine levels can be very high in patients under VA-ECMO, which maybe toxic to the cardiac myocardium. Beta-blockers can antagonize the effects of catecholamine. In patients with VA-ECMO, the protective effect of beta-blocker may improve the patients' outcome. This hypothesis also need to be tested in RCT. ELITE (Evaluation of Early CRRT and Beta-blocker InTerventions in Patients with ECMO) study is a factorial designed RCT with the purpose to test the benefit of early CRRT and beta-blocker in patients treated with V-A ECMO. In the CRRT arm, patients will be randomized to simultaneous CRRT (not late than 24 hours after the initiation of ECMO) or routine therapy (CRRT when indicated). In the beta-blocker arm, patients will be randomized to beta-blocker treatment with a heart rate target of 75±5 bpm or routine therapy. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 30 days. Patients discharged alive will be followed for 1 year. Data of mortality and quality of life which are secondary outcomes of this study, will be collected.

Recent studies have suggested that the use of left ventricular ejection volume index calculation may aid in the hemodynamic management of critically ill patients. However, a prospective and randomized comparison in patients with heart failure for inotropic dose adjustment has not been described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ejection volume index versus liberal strategy in adjusting dobutamine dose in patients with heart failure and low cardiac output. Methodology: A unicentric, randomized and prospective study will be performed in a comparative manner. Hospital data (test results, medical outcomes, dobutamine dose, complications) of patients will be analyzed for safety and effectiveness. Expected results: The use of ejection volume index is not inferior to the liberal strategy in the initial adjustment of the dose of dobutamine in patients with heart failure.

The purpose of this study is evaluate the safety and feasibility of mild therapeutic hypothermia (TH) during and 12 hours after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated with shock

Cardiogenic shock is a frequent cause of admission and death in the intensive care unit. Mortality is about 50%. Once the etiologic treatment has been done, for instance coronary revascularization, management of the shock state is the cornerstone of the treatment. Norepinephrine is the first-line vasopressor therapy because of its minor effect on heart rhythm. Morever norepinephrine is a inotrope. In a previous study, we demonstrated that increasing the norepinephrine dose increases cardiac index, cardiac power index, SVO2 and tissue perfusion without acceleration of heart rate. Nevertheless, dobutamine remains the first-line inotropic treatment. Dobutamine has a positive chronotropic effect that might cause higher myocardial oxygen consumption. As a result, combination of vasopressor / inotrope is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamics and metabolics effects of 2 treatments strategies (norepinephrine dose increasing or addition of dobutamine) in patients with cardiogenic shock and optimised blood pressure level (MAP≥65 mmHg) under norepinephrine treatment. The secondary objectives were : To evaluate the efficacy of the treatments on micro- and macrocirculation parameters To evaluate the tolerance of the treatments To evaluate the dose and the admistration's kinetics of the treatments

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device for cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. During ECMO support, renal replacement therapy (RRT) facilitate more rapid metabolic or uremic control and more effective prevention and management of fluid overload which happened in critical state. CS patients who are likely to receive ECMO support will be enrolled and randomized with a 1:1 allocation to a simultaneous RRT arm vs. standard care arm. The patients in the simultaneous RRT arm will receive RRT when ECMO is commenced. The patients in the standard care arm will not receive RRT when ECMO is commenced. Only when a patient demonstrates AKI and fulfills any one of the criteria of the conventional RRT indication during ECMO support or after ECMO weaning, conventional-indication RRT would be delivered. The primary outcome is all-cause 30-day mortality after ECMO is commenced