search

Active clinical trials for "Shock, Septic"

Results 601-610 of 645

Effects of Norepinephrine and Volume Expansion in Capillary Refill Time in Septic Shock

Septic Shock

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of norepinephrine and fluid expansion on capillary refill time during septic shock.

Unknown status5 enrollment criteria

Extracorporeal Cytokine Removal in Patients With Septic Shock in an Adult Intensive Care Unit

Septic Shock

Goals Primary: compare changes in norepinephrine requirements before and after hemoperfusion (HP) treatment. Secondary: demonstrate the decrease in levels of IL-6 , assess the total and individual change of SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT (SOFA), establish the resolution of shock , clearance of lactate , and mortality at discharge from INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (ICU), at 30 and 60 days.

Unknown status4 enrollment criteria

Safety and Efficacy of Heparin Dosing Score Protocol for Polymyxin-B Hemoperfusion

Septic ShockPolymyxin B Hemoperfusion

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) is mainly used to remove endotoxins in septic shock patients with intra-abdominal infections. Because of the concerns of postoperative bleeding, physicians may hesitate to use anticoagulation in patients with septic shock within a few hours after an abdominal operation. We developed a heparin dosing score protocol for heparin dosage adjustment. The purpose of the study is to examine the safety and efficacy of the heparin dosing score protocol.

Unknown status4 enrollment criteria

Application of Biomarkers Change to Predict Outcome of Patient With Severe Sepsis

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)Sepsis3 more

In 2004, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) introduced guidelines for the management of severe sepsis and septic shock, as well as strategies for bedside implementation. The treatment recommendations were organized in two bundles. In an international study, enrolling adult patients with severe sepsis admitted to these intensive care units, investigators found that while mortality from severe sepsis is high (44.5%), compliance with resuscitation and management bundles is generally poor in much of Asia. Investigators need to identify the patients at risk for high in-hospital mortality in order to take appropriate steps. From their past studies, investigators found that sepsis involved inflammation and coagulation. The multiple organ involvement was associated with interaction of novel biomarkers such as cytokines. There is limited data regarding comparing and application of biomarkers of different characteristic on sepsis treatment. A simultaneous detection of multiple cytokines may provide significant prognostic information. For other biomarkers, promising observation data have been put forward, but their potential needs to be evaluated in large-scale, well-designed prospective intervention studies before clinical use can be recommended. Besides many clinical studies on biomarkers were confounded by its lack of standard bundle care for severe sepsis patient. Here investigators performed a systematic study aimed at evaluating the individual and combined diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for predicting mortality; whether trend change in biomarker level more useful for above prediction; which biomarker or biomarker combination checked can predict patients at risk of evolving with severe organ dysfunctions.

Unknown status8 enrollment criteria

Terlipressin Administration in Septic Shock Refractory to Catecholamines

Septic Shock

terlipressin is given to refractory septic shock patients who do not respond to noradrenalin in Israel and Europe. It is given by bolus injection. we attempt to investigate weather it is better to give it by continuous drip and avoid abrupt changes in BP and heart function

Unknown status2 enrollment criteria

Observational Study of Sepsis and Pneumonia to Develop Diagnostic Tests

SepsisSepticemia4 more

We propose to develop novel diagnostic tests for severe sepsis and community acquired pneumonia (CAP). This program, entitled Community Acquired Pneumonia & Sepsis Outcome Diagnostics (CAPSOD), is a multidisciplinary collaboration involving investigators at six organizations: NCGR; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Indiana Centers for Applied Protein Sciences, Indianapolis, IN; and ProSanos Corp., La Jolla, CA. In the United States, Community Acquired Pneumonia is the sixth leading cause of death and the number one cause of death from infectious diseases. Of the 5.6 million annual cases of CAP, 1.1 million require hospitalization for intensive therapy. Sepsis, commonly known as blood poisoning or bloodstream infection, is the tenth leading cause of death in the US and the number one cause of death in non-cardiac intensive care units. Incidence of sepsis is increasing by 9% each year and mortality rates vary between 25 and 50%. Cost to the US healthcare system exceeds $20 billion each year. In patients with suspected sepsis or early CAP, rapid identification of patients who will develop severe sepsis or CAP is critical for effective management and positive outcome. The CAPSOD study is designed to identify novel tests for early diagnosis of severe sepsis and CAP. When performed in patients at the earliest stages of disease, these tests will have prognostic value, rapidly identifying those who will have poor outcomes or complicated courses. CAPSOD will prospectively enroll patients with sepsis and CAP at Duke University Medical Center and Henry Ford Hospital. The study will use advanced bioinformatic, metabolomic, proteomic and mRNA sequencing technologies to identify specific protein changes, or biomarkers, in patient blood samples that predict outcome in sepsis and CAP. Development of biomarker-based tests will permit patient selection for appropriate disposition, such as the intensive care unit, and use of intensive medical therapies, thereby reducing mortality and increasing effectiveness of resource allocation.

Unknown status10 enrollment criteria

Peer Support for Post Intensive Care Syndrome Self-Management

Critical IllnessSepsis9 more

A prospective, 2-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical feasibility trial design is planned. Forty CCI survivors will be randomized (1:1) to either the PS-PICS (peer support) intervention or usual care (control) group.

Unknown status9 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Plasma Angiotensin II and Angiotensin II Receptor Levels in Patients With Sepsis and...

SepsisSeptic Shock

Evaluation of plasma angiotensin II and angiotensin II receptor levels in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective observational study.

Unknown status3 enrollment criteria

"Mini Fluid Challenge Assessment: a Comparison Among Three Hemodynamic Tools"

SepsisShock2 more

The mini fluid challenge (mini_FC) is a functional hemodynamic test which has been used in different clinical contexts to assess fluid responsiveness. This test is performed by rapidly injecting a small aliquot of fluid (100 ml over 1 minute), which is followed by the infusion of the residual aliquot of fluid. Since the threshold of the mini_FC identified by the literature is rather small (5% of stroke volume (SV) increase after the 100 ml bolus to discriminate between responder and non-responder), it is crucial that the hemodynamic tool assessing this change could be reliable. Moreover, the SV changes with inspiratory/expiratory movements and the increase after the mini_FC should also consider the physiological fluctuations of the SV. In the literature this test has been performed by means of tolls with different least significant change of the SV. The least significant change (LSC) represents the smallest difference between successive measurements of SV that can be considered to be a real change and not attributable to chance. The purpose of this study is to assess the agreement among MOSTCARE system (4.5& of SV LSC described in the literature) and the echocardiography (about 10% of SV LSC described in the literature) with the PICCO system (about 1% of SV LSC described in the literature - considered the gold standard) in discriminating fluid responsiveness after a mini_FC

Unknown status12 enrollment criteria

Ratio of ''Central Venous-to-Arterial Co2 Gap'' to ''Arterial-to-Central Venous O2 Content Gap''...

Septic Shock

The high ratio of "central venous to arterial carbon dioxide" to "arterial to central venous oxygen content " is associated with elevated lactate in patients with septic shock. So, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the ratio of "central venous-to-arterial CO2 tension or content" to "arterial-to-venous O2 content'' as an indicator of anaerobic metabolism in septic shock.

Unknown status11 enrollment criteria
1...606162...65

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs