Active clinical trials for "Shock, Septic"

The purpose of this trial was to examine the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics of FE 202158 and to assess whether it can stabilize blood pressure and reduce vascular (blood vessel) leakage. FE 202158 had previously been tested in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND The association between mortality and hypoalbuminemia has been observed in several diseases. Nonetheless, the efficacy of albumin on survival in critically ill patients is controversial. Several meta-analyses have reported either negative, neutral, or beneficial effects of albumin administration. To clarify this controversy, a large multicenter prospective study has been performed, comparing the effects of 4% albumin vs. saline for volume replacement in critically ill patients. Although no difference in the overall mortality has been observed, a predefined subgroup analysis has shown a trend of longer survival in septic patients treated with albumin. As fluid replacement has been shown to be critical in sepsis, and based on both its primary (oncotic) and secondary properties (anti-inflammatory), it is conceivable that the use of albumin for volume replacement and for treating hypoalbuminemia may have a beneficial effects on survival of septic patients. OBJECTIVES Primary objective: to verify whether volume replacement with albumin (treated group) and its maintenance within plasmatic physiologic range (equal or above 30 g/l) improves survival of patients with severe sepsis of septic shock, as compared to crystalloids (control group). Secondary objectives: to verify the differences in organ dysfunctions, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay between the treated and control group. METHODS About 1350 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock will be randomized to receive either albumin or crystalloids as fluid therapy. Volume replacement will be performed for both groups according to the early-goal directed therapy. Treated group will receive 60 gr albumin infusion after randomization, and 40-60 gr albumin daily infusion to maintain serum album level equal or above 30 g/l. Control group will receive crystalloids for the entire study; albumin administration will be allowed only when daily serum albumin level will be lower than 15 g/l. Patients will be treated until the 28th day after randomization or until ICU discharge, whichever comes first. EXPECTED RESULTS Primary outcomes: absolute risk reduction of overall mortality of 7.5% at 28th day, with a further control at 90th day, following randomization. Secondary outcomes: reduction of number and severity of organ dysfunctions (as assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score), reduction of ICU and hospital length of stay.

Clinical studies evaluating the clinical use of phenylephrine in septic shock are lacking. The present study was designed to compare the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on systemic and regional hemodynamics in patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether steroids decrease 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.

Sepsis is a serious condition where there is inflammation and damage to body tissue, usually caused by an infection. This infection can lead to decreased function of vital body organs and in some cases may lead to permanent health problems or death. Much of the injury is due to endotoxin, a harmful substance produced by certain types of bacteria. An endotoxin antagonist is designed to block the effects of endotoxin. This study is designed to study the safety and efficacy when treating patients with severe sepsis.

In recent years, many studies have pointed out that bacterial toxin and cytokine storm are the main causes of shock and multiple organ failure in patients with sepsis. Endotoxin is the main vehicle for systemic inflammatory reaction caused by gram-negative bacteria which induce sepsis. Endotoxin binds to Toll- Like receptor 4 (TLR4) trigger a cytokine storm. The amount of endotoxin is associated with shock, insufficient intestinal perfusion, and poor prognosis. Therefore, clinicians try to use various methods to antagonize the action of endotoxin, which can reduce the cytokine storm and inflammatory response to improve the prognosis of sepsis. Continuous venous venous hemofiltration plays a role in blood purification in septic shock. With different hemofiltration filters, it has different effects. By removing the inflammatory mediators caused by bacterial toxins and cytokines, shock can be improved. The study plans to receive patients with septic shock and use a hemofiltration filter that adsorbs endotoxin and removes cytokines (oXiris, Baxter Healthcare) to perform continuous venous venous hemofiltration in addition to basic septic shock resuscitation. The effect on the concentration of cytokines in the blood, the infusion dose of inotropics, the fluid balances, and the degree of organ damage was evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this pilot study can lead us to subsequent randomized clinical trials to explore whether this filter can improve the prognosis of septic shock patients.

In this prospective, single-center,randomized,controlled,single-blind clinical trial,Patients will be randomly assigned to receive granisetron or placebo for 4 days or until leaving the ICU(death or transfer from ICU to general ward or discharge). The primary outcome is all-cause death rate at 28 days.

The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of low dose iloprost versus placebo for 72-hours, in up to a total of 380 patients with septic shock suffering from organ failure. The study hypothesis is that iloprost may be beneficial as an endothelial rescue treatment as it is anticipated to deactivate the endothelium and restore vascular integrity in septic shock patients suffering from organ failure caused by endothelial breakdown, ultimately improving survival.

In sepsis and septic shock, the host response is characterized by a complex of immune-inflammatory reactions; triggered and activated by microbial components. These reactions are controlled by a balance of pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The imbalance of this immune response is a source of organ dysfunction; major prognostic factor during septic condition. This pretext has created the need for therapies aimed to modulate the overstated of host response. During the past 2 decades, macrolide molecules proved interest to be immunomodulatory agents; due beyond their antibacterial activity. Their regulatory role in the production of cytokines was demonstrated in the management of severe acute community pneumonia. The investigators hypothesize that the adjunction of macrolides to standard therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock is associated to a favorable immunomodulatory and clinical effects.

Critically-ill patients frequently experience marked changes in mean arterial pressure and carbon dioxide partial arterial pressure, the two major determinants of the cerebral blood flow. In addition, many therapeutics (fluids, vasopressors or inotropes administration, blood transfusion, prone positioning...) can influence these two determinants of cerebral blood flow and thus cerebral blood flow, especially in patients with altered cerebral autoregulation. Nevertheless, cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation, as well as the effects of the different therapeutics on it have been poorly studied in critically-ill patients. In addition, it has been suggested that impaired cerebral blood flow and impaired cerebral microcirculation may be involved in the pathophysiology of septic encephalopathy in patients with sepsis and/or septic shock. In this study, we aimed to characterize and investigate the effects of different therapeutics on cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation in critically-ill patients.