Active clinical trials for "Shock, Septic"

Consecutive patients with ACLF (Acute on Chronic Liver Failure) and septic shock with AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) who give written informed consent will be included in this prospective trial at ILBS. At baseline s, endotoxin levels, NT-Pro BNP, , urine N-GAL will be done for all patients. A 10 ml serum sample will be stored for doing a cytokine profile. Septic shock will be defined by the presence of two or more diagnostic criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, proven or suspected infection with hypotension non-responsive to adequate fluid resuscitation assessed by no evidence of stroke volume variation on flow track and need of a vasopressor to achieve a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg. A record of CVP, IVC diameter and B-lines on ultrasound lung would also be done. Patients with age less than 18 years, severe known cardiopulmonary disease (structural or valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, COPD) pregnancy, chronic kidney disease, patients already meeting emergency criteria for immediate hemodialysis at the time of randomization as specified in the late group, patients transferred from other hospitals who have already been on hemodialysis before their arrival in the intensive care unit, extremely moribund patients with an expected life expectancy of less than 24 hours, failure to give informed consent from family members.

Septic shock is a major health problem, with several million cases annually worldwide and a mortality approaching 45%. Tachycardia is associated with excess mortality during septic shock. This pejorative effect could be related to the increase in cardiac metabolic demand, impaired cardiac diastolic function, and/or poorer tolerance of administered exogenous catecholamines. Recent studies suggest that controlling the heart rate with the use of beta blockers has beneficial effects on the morbidity and mortality of septic shock. However, the negative effects of beta-blockers on cardiac contractility and blood pressure complicate their use during septic shock, particularly because about one-half of patients exhibit a septic-associated systolic dysfunction, which often requires the use of inotropes. Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of If channels in the sinoatrial node. It is a pure bradycardic agent with no deleterious effect on other aspects of cardiac function (contractility, conduction and repolarization) nor on blood pressure. Ivabradine can therefore alleviate sinus tachycardia without negative inotropic effects nor hypotension. Moreover, the improvement in diastolic function (ventricular filling) with ivabradine may increase stroke volume, even in case of severe impairment of systolic function. Controlling sinus tachycardia with ivabradine during septic shock would allow reducing cardiac metabolic demand (and potentially associated ischemic events) and improving the chronotropic tolerance of exogenous catecholamines. The effectiveness of ivabradine in controlling the heart rate was demonstrated in various clinical settings such as coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Encouraging preliminary data are reported in critically ill patients.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of combining HSA 20% and terlipressin on the microcirculation in patients with septic shock using the following;- Microcirculation recruitment by Cytocam-IDF. Cardiac output by LiDCOrapid. Measuring serum lactate level.

This trial aims to identify the effects of methylene blue infusion on the the micro-circulation in patients with septic shock. The investigators will evaluate various indices of micro-circulation such as: microvascular flow index, the flow heterogeneity index, the total vessel density, the perfused vessel density, and the proportion of perfused vessels.

The beneficial effect of statins to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at risk is well established. Recent trials demonstrated that statins can exert a number of vascular actions independent of lipid lowering. Short-term simvastatin therapy recently has been reported to reduce mortality in 2 different animal models of sepsis. Pleiner and coworkers could demonstrate potent vasoprotective properties of simvastatin during Escherichia coli endotoxin induced endotoxemia in healthy volunteers. In a population-based cohort analysis it was demonstrated that administration of statins was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent sepsis. Thus, simvastatin treatment may offer a new therapeutic strategy for clinical conditions associated with inflammation like severe sepsis and septic shock. The aim of the present study is to test the hypothesis that short term treatment with simvastatin may mitigate the detrimental vascular effects of acute inflammation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring treatment for septic shock.

The study objective is to clarify whether the application of high doses CPFA (Coupled Plasma-Filtration Adsorption) in addition to the current clinical practice is able to reduce hospital mortality in septic shock patients in intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVES. To establish the therapeutic efficiency of melatonin in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Specifically: To evaluate the survival to 28 days of mechanical assisted ventilation, days with vasoactive drugs, need of hemodialysis-hemofiltration, superinfection and evolution towards the failure of other organs. To evaluate, waiting for reduction under the influence of the treatment with melatonin, : clinical - analytical parameters of sepsis; levels of cytokines; oxidative and nitrosative stress; acute-phase proteins (APP), specially of the ITIH4; immune response; endocrine response. METHODOLOGY. Patients will be randomized in two groups, n = 55 in each group: 1) treatment with melatonin 30mg/12 hours 28 days; 2) placebo. Determinations: a) clinical - analytical parameters relative to the sepsis; b) melatonin plasmatic levels; c) quantification of malonyldialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal, protein carbonyl content, nitrites, erythrocyte membrane fluidity, and superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase activity; d) Interleukins-1,2,4,5, 6, 7,8,10,12,13, IFN-γ; TNF-α and GM-CSF; e) acute-phase proteins: PCR, haptoglobin, Apo A-I, α1-GPA and ITIH4; f) lymphocytes T, B, NK, T CD4, and T CD8, and immunoglobulins; g) cortisol, aldosterone, ACTH, ADH, insulin, glucagon and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Data will be analyzed following a prospectively define plan and by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.

HW6 can prolong animal's survival time and increase the survival rate. HW6 enhances cardiac function, improves microcirculation, and increases blood pressure and pulse pressure, and improves blood perfusion of important organs; HW6's anti-shock activity comes from a combined multiple target pharmacological effects. Based on a completed phase II trial conducted in China, HW6 can effectively treatment shock patient. This is a phase II clinical study to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of Polydatin Injectable 100mg/5mL/via (HW6) in the treatment of shock in the United States. Patients with traumatic/hemorrhagic shock or septic shock admitted to the emergency room or ICU with systolic blood pressure < 90mmHg, or is on vasopressor(s) for systolic blood pressure stabilization, regardless the types of completed, on-going, or projected Standard of Care or surgery will be recruited to participant in the trial. A total of 120 patients with traumatic/hemorrhagic shock and 120 patients with septic shock will be enrolled. For each type of shock, sixty patients each will be in test group and control group. Both adult males and females aged 18-80 years are eligible. The primary clinical endpoint is the time length (TL) between the start of HW6 administration to the onset of the first treatment success, that is: the systolic blood pressure is stabilized at ≥90mmHg and MAP≥65mmHg for 1 hour without the use of vasopressors. Several secondary endpoints and biomarkers will be measured. Efficacy data will be compared using group t-test or Wilcoxon log-rank test between treatment groups and placebo groups. Safety data will also be reported accordingly.

After initial hemodynamic stabilization, 36 septic shock patients with heart rate > of 90 bpm and requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) more than 65 mmHg will be randomised into two groups, esmolol group and control group. Patients allocated to esmolol group will receive a continuous esmolol infusion to maintain a lowering of heart rate of 10%. Norepinephrine will be titrated to achieve a MAP more than 65 mmHg. To investigate myocardial performance, the investigators will assess Tissue Doppler imaging by echocardiography and hemodynamic measures. Data will be obtained at baseline ,after esmolol infusion once achieved the predefined heart rate threshold and 72hours after esmolol infusion.

The purpose of this multicentric, randomized controlled trial is to assess whether the timing of renal replacement therapy initiation (early vs delayed) has an impact on mortality at 90 days in patients with severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage (according to RIFLE criteria) during the initial phase of septic shock.