Active clinical trials for "Shock"

Assess the effect of fluids and norepinephrine for mean arterial pressure titration to patients' usual level on the microcirculation of initial resuscitated hypertensive septic shock patients.

Trauma patients, who are transfused with multiple blood products to treat shock due to blood loss, frequently develop inappropriately low vasopressin levels. Vasopressin is a hormone necessary to maintain an adequate blood pressure and low levels have been associated with the need for increased transfusions, vasopressors and additional morbidity. Vasopressin is routinely used in the ICU to treat septic shock and other disease processes resulting in decreased vasopressin levels and low blood pressure. This study will investigate the potential benefit of early vasopressin supplementation during the resuscitation of trauma patients and the applicability of using copeptin as a vasopressin biomarker. Trauma patients who receive 6 or more units of blood product within 12 hours of arrival will be randomized to receive a vasopressin bolus plus infusion or a similar volume of a placebo (normal saline) for 48 hours. Serial blood samples will be taken for 5 days post-injury. Clinical and demographic data will be recorded prospectively.

Previous studies have demonstrated that altered microvascular blood flow is an important marker of severe sepsis. Usually, these patients need invasive ventilatory support, frequent use of sedatives and it is unknown if these agents interfere or not on microvascular blood flow. The goal of this study was to compare effects of propofol and midazolam infusions on sublingual microcirculation of septic shock patients.

Life-threatening infections account for 10% of all intensive care unit admissions and constitute the second more frequent cause of death in the ICU after heart diseases. The most common cause of death in patients admitted with life-threatening infections is multi-organ failure that is mediated by severe inflammation. Given the relationship between inflammation and blood clotting, blood-thinners (also called anticoagulants) have been used to decrease inflammation and the formation of small clots. Several lines of evidence suggest that heparin, a proven and inexpensive blood-thinner, may reduce improve survival in patients diagnosed with life-threatening infection. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of enrolling patients in a large randomized controlled trial investigating heparin in patients with severe infections. In this study, patients with life-threatening infections will have an equal chance of receiving an intravenous infusion of heparin, or a low dose of a similar drug to prevent of blood clots while patients are immobile. The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that an average of 2 patients per site, per month, can be enrolled. Other measures of feasibility include the consent rate, the number of protocol violations that occur during the trial, and the number of dose reductions needed due to excessive anticoagulation. To study the biologic effects of heparin in patients with severe infection, specific laboratory markers will be measured and analyzed. If the feasibility of the trial is confirmed, a large randomized trial designed to tell if heparin can safely improve survival will be conducted. Given its low cost and availability, if heparin is shown to improve survival in patients with severe infection, adoption of this therapy on a global scale is anticipated.

The Patient evaluated in Emergency room since admission and detailed history and clinical examination done .The in hospital cases where sepsis is the culprit and shifted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in view of septic shock were included since onset of shock. Initial fluid resuscitation done and if the patient were no fluid responsive they were randomized into arms noradrenaline or terlipressin and the dose escalated to achieve the primary objectives. At the same time the strict vitals monitoring and standard medical therapy for sepsis including antibiotics and other supportive therapy continued. The patients were followed up till discharge, death or up to 28days after enrollment into the protocol (whichever the longest). The detail methodology has been explained in column 14 later.

Sepsis has been characterised as a dysregulated host response to infection. Adjunctive therapies targeting the inflammatory cascade are being increasingly explored, although to date, have failed to demonstrate consistent benefit, and sepsis continues to manifest poor outcomes. Hospital mortality in patients with septic shock remains as high as 22% in Australia and New Zealand. From a global perspective, 31 million sepsis and 19 million severe sepsis cases are expected to be treated in hospitals all over the world per year. To date, experimental data have reported that both high dose intravenous vitamin C and corticosteroids attenuate the acceleration of the inflammatory cascade and possibly reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis, enhance the release of endogenous catecholamines and improve vasopressor responsiveness. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a feasibility pilot prospective, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, trial in ICU patients with septic shock to test whether the intravenous administration of high dose Vitamin C (6g/d), Thiamine (400mg/d) and Hydrocortisone (200mg/d) leads to a more rapid resolution shock and vasopressor dependence.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of early metabolic resuscitation with combination therapy using vitamin C and thiamine in improving organ function and survival in patients with septic shock.

Septic shock is a highly lethal condition associated with a mortality risk of 30 to 60%. Optimizing tissue perfusion and oxygenation is the aim to decrease mortality and morbidity in septic shock patients. Persistent hyperlactatemia after initial resuscitation is particularly difficult to interpret, although optimizing systemic blood flow might reverse ongoing hypoperfusion. Nevertheless, if persistent hyperlactatemia is caused by non-hypoperfusion-related mechanisms, then sustained efforts aimed at increasing cardiac output (CO) could lead to detrimental effects of excessive fluids or inotropes. Another potential alternative resuscitation target is peripheral perfusion as assessed by capillary refill time (CRT), mottling score or central-to-toe temperature differences. Reversal of abnormal peripheral perfusion might represent improvement in tissue hypoperfusion with the advantage of a faster recovery than lactate. Hypothesis: Peripheral perfusion guided resuscitation in septic shock is associated with lower mortality, less organ dysfunctions, less mechanical ventilation (MV), less vasopressor load, and less renal replacement therapies than a lactate-targeted resuscitation strategy. Main Objective To test if peripheral perfusion targeted resuscitation in septic shock is associated with lower 28-day mortality than a lactate targeted resuscitation. Design: Multicenter, Parallel Assignment randomized controlled study, conducted under supervision of an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). Interventions: Active Comparator- Peripheral Perfusion guided resuscitation Active Comparator- Lactate guided resuscitation Randomization: 1:1 the randomization using a block size of eight will be stratified according to participating centers. Trial size: 400 randomized patients in 30 ICUs.

Septic shock remains a major public health problem in industrialized countries, with a mortality rate as high as 50%, largely related to multiple organ dysfunction. In addition to dysregulated inflammatory response, the pathophysiology of organ failures in septic shock involves ischemia-reperfusion processes. Remote ischemic conditioning is a therapeutic strategy for protecting organs against the detrimental effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The objective of the present study is to determine whether remote ischemic conditioning can limit the severity of organ failure in patients with septic shock.

The purpose is to demonstrate that vasoreactivity of patients with septic shock evaluated with dose-response curve is diminished in septic shock and ameliorated by activated protein C (APC). This amelioration is correlated to decrease of inflammation, decrease of reactive oxygen species (ROS) markers and increase of circulating catecholamines.