Improvement of Cerebrovascular Autoregulation in Patients With Septic Shock Due to Cytokine Elimination...
Septic ShockThe trial investigates the effect of cytokine elimination in patients with septic schock and acute renal failure with need for renal replacement therapy on the integrity of cerebrovascular autoregulation. Patients with inclusion criteria were randomly assign in either use of CytoSorb filter integrated in renal replacement therapy versus non additional filter an renal replacement therapy alone. Cerebrovascular autoregulation will be measured with transcranial Doppler ultrasound and correlation with arterial blood pressure.
Alar Batten Graft vs Latera for Nasal Valve Collapse
Nasal Valve IncompetenceNasal obstruction is a common complaint for the patient presenting to the Otolaryngologist and/or the Facial Plastic surgeon. There are numerous potential causes of nasal obstruction, with more easily addressed pathologies such as posterior septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy often being over-diagnosed. Nasal valve obstruction, particularly dynamic nasal sidewall collapse, is of significant interest to the rhinoplasty surgeon. Traditionally, collapse of the nasal sidewall has been addressed via structural cartilage grafting, with alar batten grafting being the most commonly used method to provide support to the weak nasal sidewall. Recently, an absorbable nasal implant, comprised of a polylactic acid copolymer, has been advocated for supporting the nasal sidewall and relieving nasal obstruction. There are several proposed advantages of the implant over traditional operative techniques, namely the ease of endonasal insertion, which can be performed in the outpatient clinic setting. Preliminary investigations demonstrate subjective improvement in nasal obstruction with use of the implant, however, there has been no direct comparison with traditional techniques utilizing cartilage grafting. This study is being done at both UVa and in Oregon. This prospective study will randomize patients with nasal obstruction and documented dynamic nasal sidewall collapse into one of two groups undergoing treatment with either endonasal batten grafting or the absorbable Latera nasal valve implant. Preoperative and postoperative nasal obstruction will be assessed with a validated survey for nasal obstructive symptoms, the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. The mean preoperative and postoperative NOSE score between the groups will be compared at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively to compare the efficacy of both techniques. Subjects will be blinded to the surgical intervention they receive.
Terlipressin Alone Versus the Standard Therapy With Catecholamines for Hepatic Patients With Septic...
Resolution of Septic Shock With TerlipressinThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of terlipressin compared to standard regimen in hepatic patients with septic shock. Another aim is to compare the mortality rate & the effects on renal functions in both groups.
Evaluation of Early Association of Terlipressin and Norepinephrine During Septic Shock; the TerliNor...
Septic ShockIn guidelines norepinephrine is the first line vasopressor recommended in case of septic shock. Use of vasopressin is recommended when norepinephrine fails to maintain a mean arterial pressure above 65mmHg or in salvage. Several studies failed to show a superiority of vasopressin over norepinephrine but none evaluated the effect of an early association on organ failure. Terlipressin is a pro-drug of vasopressin which has the same vasoconstrictor effect. We hypothesize that the early association of terlipressin and norepinephrine during septic shock reduces organ failure. This bi centric, double-blinded, randomised, controlled versus placebo study includes 40 patients. Randomisation will be stratified between centers (two university affiliated intensive care units of Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France). All patients with septic shock needing more than 0,5µg/kg/min of norepinephrine to reach PAM objectives are randomised, after hemodynamic evaluation and optimisation, to receive continuous infusions of terlipressin (0,01mg/kg/min) or placebo (physiologic serum). The 2 groups receive steroid therapy (continuous intravenous hydrocortisone perfusion) at this time. Clinicians are blinded of perfusion used. Use of terlipressin remains possible in salvage when patients need more of 1µg/kg/min of norepinephrine on physician's decision. Patients with acute ischemic or septic heart failure are excluded of the study. Primary objective is sepsis related Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score difference between the groups at day 3. Secondary objectives are mortality at day 28, lactates clearance in the first 48hours, renal function (evaluates with AKIN criteria) and use of renal replacement therapy.
Effect of Albumin Administration on Vasopressor Duration in Resolving Septic Shock
ShockSepticThe role of albumin in sepsis has been controversial for decades. Although hypoalbuminemia has been associated with worse outcomes in sepsis, definitive evidence does not exist that replacing albumin in these patients improves outcomes. However, subgroup analyses from large clinical trials indicate that albumin may reduce mortality in septic shock, and in particular, may reduce the time a patient requires vasopressor support. Given this background, we are conducting this study to evaluate the role of albumin replacement in the patient with resolving septic shock to determine if albumin administration reduces the time a patient requires vasopressor support, reduces the time required for central line, and ultimately whether any potential benefit in terms of reduction of vasopressor support is associated with ICU length of stay and other outcomes. The approach is unique from larger trials of albumin in that it is a septic shock study geared at a particular phenotype of the patient in septic shock and evaluating a specific intervention at a specific time point in the course of septic shock.
What Should be the Next Vasopressor for Severe Septic Shock? Methylene Blue or Terlipressin
Septic ShockRefractory ShockThe ICU mortality rate of patients with septic shock was still high upto 54.1%.In first 6 hours of resuscitation, the goals of resuscitation in sepsis shock after adequate fluid resuscitation is MAP ≥65 mmHg. In refractory septic shock patient, prolong shock correlate with poor outcome due to multiple organ failure. Alternative vasopressor in septic shock with catecholamine resistance has been studied such as terlipressin, methylene blue Terlipressin (TP) mediate vasoconstriction via V1 receptors coupled to phospholipase C, and increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration Methylene blue (MB) directly inhibits nitric oxide synthase (NOS) by inhibit the enzyme guanylate cyclase (GC)
Russian Clinical Trial of Mesenchymal Cells in Patients With Septic Shock and Severe Neutropenia...
Septic ShockNonchemotherapy Drug-induced Neutropenia2 moreSeptic shock remains a significant clinical problem associated with high rates of mortality among neutropenic patient despite antimicrobial therapy and supportive care. Recently, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have demonstrated remarkable potential effect in sepsis. MSC treatment significantly reduced mortality in septic mice receiving appropriate antimicrobial therapy. MSCs reduced systemic inflammatory cytokine levels in mice, down-regulated of inflammation and inflammation-related genes (such as interleukin-10, interleukin-6). Bacterial clearance was greater in MSC-treated mice. Thus, MSCs have beneficial effects on experimental sepsis and suggest that MSСs-therapy may be an effective adjunctive treatment to reduce sepsis-related mortality. The safety of MSCs is proved by Graft-versus-host disease treatment MSCs in patients after bone marrow transplantation. This study hypothesis is that MSCs reduce organ dysfunction/injury, systemic inflammation and mortality in patients with septic shock and severe neutropenia. The main goal of the study is to evaluate the impact of MSCs therapy on organ dysfunction/injury, systemic inflammation and 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock and severe neutropenia. All patients will be randomized in two groups: control group (standard treatment of septic shock) and MSCs-group (standard treatment of septic shock + MSCs infusion of 1-2 millions/kg/ day).
An Upgrading of the Resuscitative Patterns by Utilization of the Balanced Crystalloids and Synthetic...
BurnsShockFluid Therapy Lithium Dilution Cardiac Output (LIDCO) controlled trial in BURNS (FACT in BURNS) is a prospective randomized multicentric study. Introduction: The goal of this trial is the verification, optional upgrading and optimizing of the resuscitative patterns in light of the new generation of balanced crystalloids and colloids and, by utilization the non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring LIDCO.
Protocol-driven Hemodynamic Support for Patients With Septic Shock
ShockSeptic2 moreThis research is being done to see if a protocol (a set of orders that determine how much and how quickly a drug/fluid is given) for fluid and drugs used to increase blood pressure (vasopressors) will work better then general clinical practices to improve outcomes in patients with septic shock.
Clinical Trial of Antioxidant Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock
Oxidative StressSeptic ShockSepsis and septic shock are public health problems worldwide that represents an excessive cost for health systems. Despite the great technological and research advances, mortality can reach up to 80% in patients with multiple organ failure (FOM). Therapeutic studies focused on evaluating the usefulness of the use of antioxidants have shown different outcomes and results. This randomized clinical trial in patients with septic shock at two general intensive care units try to evaluate the usefulness of four different antioxidant therapies added to the conventional treatment, which includes: n-acetyl cysteine, vitamin C, vitamin E and melatonin. Measurement of parameters before and after treatment of oxidative stress includes nitrates and nitrites, lipid peroxidation, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione s transferase, extracellular activity of SOD, GSH concentration and evaluation of total antioxidant capacity. The investigators will also evaluate the clinical impact of antioxidant therapy with the SOFA score.