Active clinical trials for "Sinusitis"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two antibiotic regimens in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis (sinus infection) in non-hospitalized adult patients. A 5-day course of 750 milligrams of levofloxacin given by mouth once daily will be compared to a 10-day course of 500 milligrams of levofloxacin given by mouth once daily.

The investigators are looking at the effects of baby shampoo nasal irrigation on the movement of mucous in the nose in patients who have undergone sinus surgery for chronic sinus problems.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cyclamen europaeum extract 10 % (v/v) compared to placebo in subjects with acute sinusitis

This study evaluated the time to bacteriological eradication of common pathogens during moxifloxacin therapy for acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. The study also examined the time to resolution of key symptoms associated with sinusitis.

Chronic sinusitis is a frequent complication in cystic fibrosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether Pulmozyme(dornase alfa) would maintain sinus health (compared to placebo) in patients with cystic fibrosis who have recently undergone sinus surgery.

Does presentation of clinical evidence for decision making at point-of-care improve prescribing patterns in ambulatory pediatrics?

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of maxillary sinus saline irrigation in conjunction with systemic antibiotic therapy versus systemic antibiotic therapy alone in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis, a prospective randomized controlled trial.

This study investigate the additive effect of systemic postoperative steroids in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRSwNP). All patients receive a functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) followed by topical steroid spray for 3 months. Postoperatively, patients will be randomized to either an additional systemic steroid or a placebo for 1 month. Patients will be followed for 2 years. Effect on Nasal Polyp score (NPS), Lund-Kennedy-Score (LKS), recurrence rates, smell scores, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and mucus/serum biomarkers will be measured.

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has become the standard of care for patients suffering of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwP) who have failed medical therapy. The goal of surgery is now to widely marsupialize the sinus cavities in order to optimize topical steroid irrigation treatment in the postoperative period. With that being said, the true extent of surgery needed for optimal patient outcome has yet to be elucidated. More specifically, in the last 30 years, people have argued about the best way to manage the middle turbinate. Some state that it should be preserved at all times to protect the sinus cavities from inhaled irritants and allergens and keep this surgical landmark untouched for future surgeries. On the other hand, there are defenders of routine resection of this turbinate, whether it is affected by polypoid changes or not. Many studies have looked at the potential risks of resecting the middle turbinates such as iatrogenic frontal sinusitis, anosmia, or atrophic rhinitis but the more recent literature does not show such significant associations. A recent topic of debate is whether partial removal of the anterior and inferior portion of the middle turbinate affects nasal polyps recurrence or improves long-term outcomes by further facilitation of post-operative topical therapies. Some retrospective data has shown that its resection could prolong the time before the need for revision surgery and improve both endoscopic and olfaction scores. A few prospective studies have also been published but unfortunately none of these were randomized, thus introducing a significant selection bias. Thus, there is a need for a formal randomized, controlled trial to elucidate this question.

While oral steroids have been shown to be effective in the management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps, its role in treating chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps (CRSsNP) is ambiguous. Despite a lack of strong clinical evidence to suggest a benefit in this disease state, steroids are often prescribed as a component of post-operative care after sinus surgery for patients without polyps. Oral steroids carry with them significant adverse effects, and should be prescribed thoughtfully. The aims of this study are to determine if oral steroids in the peri-operative period improves patient outcomes in CRS without polyps.