Active clinical trials for "Sinusitis"

The purpose of this study is to determine the best duration(3 versus 6 weeks) of antibiotics as part of maximal medical therapy for treating chronic sinusitis and thus preventing patients from having to have sinus surgery. The hypothesis is that in the context of maximal medical therapy 3 weeks of antibiotics is not worse than 6 weeks of antibiotics at successfully treating chronic sinusitis.

All adult patients undergoing sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that satisfy the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be included in the study. All patients enrolled in this study will have spacers (impregnated with saline or Triamcinolone) inserted into their middle meati after sinus surgery. Patients will serve as their own controls. Nostril's will be randomized to either the experimental treatment (Triamcinolone-impregnated spacer) or the control treatment (Saline-impregnated spacer). These spacers will be removed after 6-days post-op. Participants will undergo the standard post-operative endoscopic sinus surgery follow-up appointments plus one additional research visit (not standard of care). This includes follow-up appointments at 6 days, 14 days, 5 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months of the post-operative period. During these appointments, the surgeon will assess the post-operative mucosal appearance (Philpott-Javer Sinus Rating System). SNOT-22 surveys will be administered, as per standard protocol, at each post-op follow up visit. Sinus tissue biopsies will be taken from both meati on 28-day and 3-month post-op follow-up appointments for analysis. Our objective is to determine if triamcinolone soaked Merocel middle meatus spacers (MMS) in a perforated glove finger improves patient outcomes, wound healing and reduces inflammation compared to a standard saline-soaked merocel sponge within a perforated glove finger in CRS patients receiving FESS. Our hypothesis is that triamcinolone-medicated Merocel MMS are not inferior to standard saline-soaked spacers, when both are enclosed in a perforated surgical glove finger.

The investigators are doing this research study to learn more about a drug called Xolair (omalizumab). The investigators want to see if it is an effective treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Specifically, the investigators want to see whether Xolair will make nasal polyps smaller and less thick, and relieve symptoms in people with CRS. Polyps are abnormal growths of tissue that can grow in the lining of your sinuses (the inside of your nose). The investigators also want to find out if it is safe to use (whether it causes side effects).

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study to assess safety and long-term patency of the ostia treated with the XprESS device per the device indication for use (IFU).

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is an effective treatment of sinus disease. FESS is carried out using cameras to view the surgical field. Bleeding during the surgery can lead to poor surgical field visualization. Poor visualization has been associated with worse surgical outcomes. Tranexamic acid is a safe and effective agent used to achieve hemostasis during operative procedures. The current study is a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing FESS to compare the effects of tranexamic acid versus placebo and the effects on surgical field visualization and adverse events.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition of the nose and sinuses. It affects about 5 to 10% of Canadians. Patients suffer from congestion in the nose and sinuses, nasal discharge, pressure in the face, and a reduced sense of smell. This affects people's enjoyment of life. Medical management uses sprays or pills to treat these symptoms but for some patients sinus surgery is needed. This type of surgery is called endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). There is no single correct approach to take care of patients after sinus surgery. Most experts would use a nasal spray and a short-course of oral steroid pills to reduce sinus swelling and minimize complications related to scarring. "Steroid-eluting nasal spacers" are devices placed inside the sinus during surgery and slowly release topical steroids into the sinuses better than steroid sprays. These "spacers" have been shown to improve results following sinus surgery. When using these special "spacers", there may no longer be a need for oral steroid pills following surgery. This would help to avoid potential side effects associated with these medications. The purpose of this study is to find out whether taking oral (systemic) steroid pills following sinus surgery is necessary to improve surgical results, now that steroid-eluting nasal spacers are commonly used during surgery.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate histamine, CGRP and VIP levels in saliva as biological markers for activation of trigeminal and parasympathetic nerve fibers in various clinical presentations of primary headaches compared to allergic rhinosinusitis and control populations.

Viral upper respiratory infections occur frequently during childhood (6-8 per year) and are, for the most part, self-limited episodes that resolve spontaneously and do not require antibiotic therapy. Acute otitis media and acute bacterial sinusitis are frequent complications of viral upper respiratory infections that will benefit from treatment with antibiotics. Acute bacterial sinusitis is one of the most common diagnoses in ambulatory practice and, in all age groups, accounts for an estimated 25 million physician office visits annually. It is essential to distinguish between patients who are experiencing uncomplicated viral upper respiratory infections and acute bacterial sinusitis to avoid the excessive use of antibiotics for patients who will not benefit from them. This is especially important now because of the escalation of antibiotic resistance among the bacteria that commonly cause acute bacterial sinusitis, acute otitis media and pneumonia. Inappropriate use of antibiotics is a major contributor to the problem of antimicrobial resistance - a problem which dramatically increases both the cost and complexity of treatment. To improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute bacterial sinusitis and reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics, clinical guidelines have been developed by three national organizations: the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Traditionally, the diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis is suspected on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms and is confirmed with the performance of images (either plain radiographs, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). All three guidelines recommend that the diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis should be based on clinical criteria alone without the confirmation of imaging or other laboratory data. Although the similarity between the different guidelines suggests that there is widespread consensus to use clinical criteria to diagnose acute bacterial sinusitis, there is virtually no evidence to support this position. Specific Aim 1 of this project is to evaluate the use of clinical criteria, without the performance of images, as the basis for the diagnosis of acute bacterial sinusitis. A randomized, placebo-controlled study design will be used to determine if the clinical criteria proposed by the different guidelines can be used to identify children with upper respiratory symptoms who will respond to antibiotic therapy. It is expected that children with acute bacterial sinusitis who receive an antimicrobial will recover more quickly and more often than children who receive placebo.

The hypothesis of this study is that a gastroesophageal reflux recommended treatment with proton pump inhibitor (dose and duration) compared to placebo significantly reduces both the signs and symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis. Primary objective was to determine whether 8 weeks of treatment with omeprazole 20 mg ones daily (OD) significantly reduces the signs and symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux when compared to placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux with comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis. Secondary objectives were to determine whether 8 weeks of treatment with omeprazole 20 mg OD significantly reduces the signs and symptoms of comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux when compared to matching placebo; and to investigate the association of the severity of signs and symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux with the ones of chronic rhinosinusitis in the same group of patients. The research was carried out as a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial. Patients were randomized into two groups in an approximate 1:1 ratio using a concealed random sequence. After randomization and initial assessment treatment was initialized. Patients on active treatment were given omeprazole 20 mg once daily half an hour before breakfast for 8 weeks, while those in the placebo group were given matching placebo tablets using the same regimen for 8 weeks as the group on the active treatment. Patients were reassessed at the end of treatment for signs and symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis.

The trial was conducted as a prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind study in 4 parallel groups of patients.