Active clinical trials for "Sleep Apnea Syndromes"

Heart Failure affects 5-6 million Americans and there are about 550 thousand new cases of heart failure every year. There are approximately 3 million hospital admission for acute decompensated heart failure with hospital readmission rate of 20% at 30 days and 50% at 60 day, costing up to 20 billion dollars per year. In our previous study we have discovered that sleep disordered breathing is prevalent in 70% of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. We hypothesize that, detection and treatment of sleep disordered breathing in acute decompensated heart failure patients will reduce episodic hypoxic events during acute decompensation and may decrease hospital length of stay and reduce future readmissions.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two different physical activity regimens as complementary or alternative treatment options for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. A secondary purpose of the study is to examine the effects of these activity regimens on various health consequences of obstructive sleep apnea, including blood pressure, systemic inflammation, and daytime functioning.

The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare the efficacy of two approaches to initiate Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) treatment in patients diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by portable monitoring (PM) (limited sleep study). One pathway involves attended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) titration by PSG (full attended sleep study) followed by CPAP treatment. The other pathway involves treatment with auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP)(without a titration). Study Aims: Compare PAP adherence, improvement in subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), reaction time (Psychomotor vigilance test), quality of life by the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and PAP satisfaction (PAP satisfaction questionnaire) between the two study arms.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is better at treating complex sleep apnea over time.

This multi-site project compares compares the efficiency of a home-based portable monitoring strategy to a standard of care sleep laboratory-based strategy for the diagnosis and positive airway pressure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of different methods of providing education about sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) use and how that education might help to improve health outcomes and the amount of time CPAP is used.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition in hypertensive patients. The renin-angiotension-aldosterone-system (RAAS) has a central role in blood pressure control. An angiotensin-II-antagonist, Losartan, is an effective antihypertensive drug. However, some patients respond to this drug worse than the others, and it is a clinical praxis to either increase the dosage and/or add another drug. There is limited data regarding the impact of antihypertensive drugs in OSA patients, i.e., whether or not OSA may constitute the subgroup of therapy-resistent hypertensive patients. In the literature, there is no data, either, whether or not CPAP treatment may have an additive blood pressure lowering impact in this certain subgroup.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) worsens the prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Many of these subjects do not report daytime sleepiness, and therefore, are not considered for OSA treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). There is lack of evidence regarding the impact of CPAP on the long-term prognosis of CAD patients with OSA. The Randomized Intervention with CPAP in CAD and OSA (RICCADSA) trial is designed to address if CPAP treatment reduces the combined rate of new revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular mortality over mean follow-up period of 3-years in CAD patients with OSA without daytime sleepiness.Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular biomarkers, cardiac function, maximal exercise capacity and quality of life at baseline, 3-month- and 1-year follow-up as well as polysomnographic findings and adherence to CPAP therapy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate effects from a mandibular repositioning appliance on obstructive sleep apneas, symptoms, blood pressure and markers of stress, inflammation and cardiovascular health in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome and in patients with symptomatic snoring.

Specific Aim: To prove our hypothesis that in severe OSA patients without daytime sleepiness, CPAP worked as effectively as in severe OSA patients with daytime sleepiness. Using sham CPAP as the optimal placebo, we conduct a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial to assess the CPAP effect in severe OSA patients without daytime sleepiness. To establish a model to predict the CPAP effect We use the parameters of five aspects, including changes of polysomnographic parameters, improvement of sleepiness, fatigue and QOL, sympathetic activity, inflammatory mediators and metabolism, to establish a model to predict CPAP effect.