Active clinical trials for "Small Cell Lung Carcinoma"

Protocol PEN-221-001 is an open-label, multicenter Phase 1/2a study evaluating PEN-221 in patients with SSTR2 expressing advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or lung or thymus or other neuroendocrine tumors or small cell lung cancer or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.

This research study is being done to assess the safety and tolerability of study drugs, 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-Octreotate (Lutathera) and nivolumab in subjects with small cell lung cancer or advanced or inoperable neuroendocrine tumor of the lung that has overexpressed somatostatin receptors (SSRT). Lutathera is an investigational radioactive agent that targets tumor cells that express SSRT. Nivolumab is an investigational agent that targets and inhibits a pathway that prevents your immune system from effectively fighting your cancer. The combination of these 2 study drugs is investigational. The term "Investigational" in this context means that the drugs have not been approved for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Giving Lutathera and nivolumab together may increase the effectiveness of this therapy. We first need to find out the highest dose of Lutathera that can be given safely together with nivolumab. This study will be the first study to test giving Lutathera together with nivolumab. Once we have found the highest dose of Lutathera that can be given with nivolumab, we will treat more patients with this combination to determine how effective it is. The purposes of this study are: To find the highest doses of Lutathera that can be given with nivolumab without causing severe side effects. To find out the side effects seen by giving Lutathera at different dose levels with nivolumab. To determine if the amount of something in your tumor called PD-L1 makes you more likely to have a response to the combination of Lutathera and nivolumab.

APG-1252 is a highly potent Bcl-2 family protein inhibitor, a promising drug candidate which shown high binding affinities to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Bcl-w. The preclinical studies have shown that APG-1252 alone achieves complete and persistent tumor regression in multiple tumor xenograft models with a twice weekly or weekly dose-schedule, including SCLC, colon, breast and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) cancer xenografts; achieves strong synergy with the chemotherapeutic agents, indicating that APG-1252 may have a broad therapeutic potential for the treatment of human cancer as a single agent and in combination with other classes of anticancer drugs. APG-1252 is intended for the treatment of patients with SCLC or other solid tumors. This is a multi-center, open-label, dose escalation Phase I study to determine the MTD and DLTs of intravenously administered APG-1252. After dose escalation to 240mg twice weekly, 2 dose cohorts two different dosing schedules including weekly and twice weekly will be assessed to evaluate for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy. Treatment with APG-1252 will be administered to 30-60 patients at approximately 2 investigational sites in US.

The main purpose of this Phase 1/2 study is to determine the safety and efficacy of pegzilarginase in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with ED-SCLC who have relapsed or progressive disease on or within 6 months of platinum-based chemotherapy.

This study is a single arm, multi-center phase II study of AZD6738 and olaparib combination therapy in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) as a second or third line chemotherapy. Patients will receive AZD6738 and olaparib combination therapy. The arm is composed of 45 patients. AZD6738 160mg QD per os administered for 7 days and olaparib 300mg BID per os administered daily. One cycle is considered of 28 days. Tumour evaluation using RECIST 1.1 will be conducted at screening (within 28 days prior to first dose) and every 8 weeks relative to the date, up to week 56, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression (within a window of ± 7 days of the scheduled date). Study treatment will be continued until objective disease progression (unless other criteria for treatment discontinuation are met). Patients may continue AZD6738 and olaparib beyond progression (according to RECIST 1.1), at the discretion of the investigator if they are clinically benefiting from the treatment and they do not meet any other discontinuation criteria. If a patient discontinues study treatment prior to disease progression, they should continue to be assessed using RECIST 1.1 until disease progression and then followed up for survival. Assessments for survival should be made every 8 weeks following objective disease progression. The details of first and subsequent therapies for cancer, after discontinuation of AZD6738 and olaparib treatment, will be collected. The imaging modalities used for RECIST 1.1 assessment will be CT or MRI scans of chest, abdomen and pelvis. RECIST 1.1 scans will be analysed by the investigator on site. Patients may also be requested to provide tumour samples from the primary or metastatic tumours on progression to understand resistance mechanisms. Sample provision is optional and depend on the patient's will.

This trial is a multicenter, perspective, non-blinded, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. In order to establish whether the SIB technique can improve the results of twice-daily chemo-RT for patients with LS-SCLC, the investigators will primarily compare survival of patients treated with standard chemotherapy (cisplatin and etoposide) and either SIB twice-daily RT or standard dose twice-daily RT.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of INCAGN02385 in participants with advanced malignancies.

This study is a single arm, multi-center phase II study of olaparib monotherapy in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) harboring HR pathway gene mutations not limited to BRCA 1/2 mutations, ATM deficiency or MRE11A mutations as second or third line chemotherapy. Target subject population: Patients with small cell lung cancer that have progressed following first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients must have imaging confirmed progression on 1st line chemotherapy for SCLC treatment, which must have contained platinum-based regimen, with at least one measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1.

Etoposide-cisplatin/ -carboplatin in combination with PD-L1 inhibitor for 4 cycles followed by maintenance therapy with PD-L1 inhibitor is currently the world-wide first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. When 4 cycles of EC/EP chemotherapy combined with PD-L1 inhibitor are effective, guidelines recommend additional thoracic radiotherapy. In our study, the investigators bring radiotherapy forward, which means that after 2 cycles of EC/EP chemotherapy plus Atezolizumab, participants with response（PR/CR/SD）will receive concurrent radiotherapy and 2 cycles of EC/EP chemotherapy plus Atezolizumab, then maintenance therapy with Atezolizumab （Q3W）. The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of Atezolizumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in untreated participants with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

This is a single-arm, real-world study in Chinese patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Trilaciclib's protection against chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression, the safety and the impact on the antitumor effects of the combination with chemotherapy in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC in the real world. Patients with ES-SCLC who already use or plan to use Trilaciclib will be invited to participate in the study. Data were collected from 28 days prior to initial chemotherapy (platinum/etoposide or topotecan systemic chemotherapy) after patients signed informed consent until patients died, dropped out of the study, lost to follow-up, informed withdrawal, or study termination. The end time of the study was defined as withdrawal of information, loss of follow-up or death of all enrolled patients, or 12 months after the last patient was enrolled, whichever happened earlier.