search

Active clinical trials for "Spinal Stenosis"

Results 211-220 of 384

Greenwich Lumbar Stenosis SLIP Study

Spinal StenosisSpondylolisthesis

The purpose of the study is to determine the proper use of lower back screws and rods (instrumentation) and bony fusion in subjects with one level of degenerative spinal narrowing (stenosis) compressing nerves to the legs with one spinal bone slipping forward on another (spondylolisthesis). There are two types of operations that surgeons perform for this problem. Some spinal surgeons remove some bone in the back (laminectomy) to decompress the nerves. Other surgeons perform a laminectomy (decompression) as above, but feel that it is also important to strengthen the back by placing screws and rods into the spine and adding more bone to obtain a new bridge of bone away from the nerves (decompression with instrumented fusion). This study aims to test the hypothesis that adding instrumented fusion to a decompression for this spinal problem will improve long term patient outcomes.

Completed5 enrollment criteria

MiDAS II (Mild® Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): Vertos Mild Patient Evaluation Study...

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

This is a multi-center, prospective, patient outcomes assessment of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression with the Mild® devices in patients with symptomatic central canal spinal stenosis.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

Study of Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI) Versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (Mild®)...

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

This is a single-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes with MILD® devices versus epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe central canal spinal stenosis.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

The Vertos MILD™ Preliminary Patient Evaluation Study

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

This is a single-center, open label, prospective clinical study to assess the clinical application and functional outcomes of symptomatic patients undergoing the Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD™) treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. In this study, patient-reported outcomes over a 3 month period following treatment will be collected by the investigator. Periodic surveys for each study subject's pain, functional status, quality of life and physical examination will track outcomes following MILD™ treatment.

Completed21 enrollment criteria

The Impact of Epidural Fat Resection on Postoperative Outcomes in Posterior Surgery of Lumbar Spine...

Spinal Stenosis

Posterior lumbar epidural fat commonly had been considered a simple space-filling tissue. Anatomic studies on posterior epidural space and its contents are few, including semifluid property. In other words, there has not been studied thoroughly regarding the significance and role of posterior epidural fat in lumbar spine. In adults, epidural fat situated in the posterior triangle limited by the lamina, the ligamentum flavum, and the posterior surface of thecal sac. The fat tissue was covered by a thin membrane of connective tissue, which were free under this layer. The anterior surface of this membrane lay close to the dura mater without any attachment. To date, the epidural fat has been resected routinely by pituitary forcep and suction drainage during posterior lumbar surgery. However, the investigators focused on the role of epidural fat, which might be associated with postoperative outcome. The investigators thought that this peculiar character, epidural fat, should be caused by certain etiologies. In general, each tissue, such as epidural fat, has its inherited features and significance, thereby the epidural fat has also specific role. However, there has not been fully studies regarding it. Thus, the investigators aimed to evaluate the impact of the posterior epidural fat on the postoperative outcomes such as pain intensity and functional outcomes by whether the epidural fat would be resected or not during posterior decompressive surgery. The investigators hypothesized that the epidural fat would be associated with postoperative pain intensitive, functional outcomes, and complications of the surgery such as failed back surgery syndrome. In this study, new device for resection of epidural fat was not utilized, but just resected with conventional devices such as pituitary forcep.

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Irrigation Endoscopic Decompression

Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

To evaluate a new endoscopic technique for lumbar spinal canal decompression.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

The MiDAS ENCORE Study

Spinal StenosisLumbar Region1 more

Study Objective: To compare patient outcomes following treatment with either the MILD procedure or epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in patients with painful lumbar spinal stenosis exhibiting neurogenic claudication and having verified ligamentum flavum hypertrophy as a contributing factor.

Completed19 enrollment criteria

Does PTH 1-34 (Teriparatide) Enhance Spinal Fusion in Humans?

Spinal Stenosis

Parathyroid (PTH) hormone has been shown to enhance fracture healing in animal studies. There are so far only three published papers concerning humans. Postero-lateral fusions have shown a healing rate of less than 50% after bone. The purpose of this study is to determine if PTH 1-34 (teriparatide) improves the healing rate and the clinical course after spinal stenosis surgery.

Completed10 enrollment criteria

The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumentated Posterolateral Fusionin...

Spinal StenosisLow Back Pain

The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudicatio(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc. Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operativ conservative treatment to operation. Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommented.(Ausman). The investigators want to se whether i-FACTOR improves clinical outcomes compared to using allograft in spinal fusion in the elderly, and thereby find an improved methods operating this diffycult patient population. The hypothesis is, that there is no difference in clinical outcomes whether you use i-FACTOR or allograft i non-instrumentated spinal fusion surgery in patients with spinal stenosis due to degenerative listhesis.

Completed18 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of 3D Machine-vision Image Guided Surgery Spine Navigation

Spinal StenosisLumbar Region1 more

This study assesses clinical outcomes following the use of the MvIGS spine navigation system for treatment of spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine in adults. There will be separate study arms for cases utilizing the three-dimensional (3D) MvIGS spine navigation system and cases that utilize conventional two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy.

Completed30 enrollment criteria
1...212223...39

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs