search

Active clinical trials for "Spinal Stenosis"

Results 41-50 of 384

Modified Enhanced Recovery After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery

Lumbar SpondylosisLumbar Spinal Stenosis1 more

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate whether modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) can shorten the postoperative hospital stay among patients with lumbar degenerative disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: Whether ERAS can shorten the postoperative hospital stay. Whether modified ERAS can improve postoperative functional recovery, improve functional score and pain score, reduce hospitalization costs, improve mental state, and improve abdominal indicators, etc. Participants will be randomized into modified ERAS group, or control group.

Recruiting16 enrollment criteria

Comparing General Anesthesia, General Anesthesia With ESP Block or TLIP Block in Patients Undergoing...

Lumbar Disc HerniationLumbar Discogenic Pain2 more

The regional methods of anesthesia for the neurosurgical operations of the spine and spinal cord reducing the needs for opioids intra operatively and reducing pain in the postoperative period, decrease the numbers of failed back syndrome.

Recruiting6 enrollment criteria

Minimally Invasive Decompression and Fusion Versus Open for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis

Lumbar Spinal StenosisIntervertebral Disc Degeneration

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of minimally invasive decompression and fusion over the traditional open decompression and fusion in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Postoperative follow-up will continue for 12 months. Сlinical, safety, radiological and cost-effectiveness endpoints will be evaluated.

Recruiting17 enrollment criteria

Vancomycin Powder Combined With Autogenous Bone Graft as a Prevention for Post-operative Infection...

Spinal FusionSpinal Stenosis1 more

Deep surgical site infection (DSSI) is one of the most challenging complications for spinal surgeons and can lead to a poor clinical outcome. This ambispective study was designed to examine the effect of vancomycin powder mixed with autogenous bone graft and bone substitute on preventing deep surgical site infection (DSSI) in degenerative lumbar fusion surgeries as well as any interference with bony fusion.

Recruiting6 enrollment criteria

PREventing Pain After Surgery

PainBack5 more

The present study aims to adapt and modify a brief presurgical Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention aimed at preventing the transition to Chronic Post-Surgical Pain (CPSP) and reducing long-term opioid use. Investigators will then assess the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the finalized intervention to prevent the transition to CPSP and reduce post-surgical opioid use six months following lumbar spine surgery. Finally, investigators will identify psychosocial and psychophysical phenotypes associated with response to this intervention.

Recruiting9 enrollment criteria

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Enhanced Recovery After SurgerySpinal Fusion2 more

This study is a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial designed to evaluate the impact of implementing the 'Early Recovery After Surgery Clinical Pathway (ERAS CP)' on patient-reported pain levels at the time of discharge following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) surgery

Recruiting11 enrollment criteria

The Effect of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises on Pain and Disability After Spinal Surgery...

Spinal Stenosis Lumbar

This study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study to determine the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises on pain and disability in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Recruiting9 enrollment criteria

The NORDSTEN Studies/ The Spinal Stenosis Study

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is a clinical entity were narrowing of the spinal canal gives a compression of the the neural and vascular structures in the spinal canal. This often gives neurogenic claudication and sometimes severe Low Back Pain (LBP). Surgery for LSS is today the most often performed procedure in the adult lumbar spine. Beneficial effect of surgical treatment is well documented by several clinical trials, and a Cochrane review article from 2005 concludes that surgical treatment is superior to non-surgical treatment. The surgical solution is to decompress the stenotic part of the lumbar spine. There is no consensus in the literature of which surgical method that gives best long term clinical results. The investigators are therefore planning a Randomized Controlled Trial, where they will compare clinical and radiological results of three different surgical methods for LSS. The main outcome of this study is to answer which surgical method that gives the best long term clinical results. And, secondary outcome is to find out how much increase of the Dural Sac Cross Sectional Area is needed to give a long time relief of the patients' symptoms.

Active17 enrollment criteria

Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpondylolisthesis1 more

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), is a common disorder of narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of the back. This causes discomfort in the legs when standing or walking because of pressure on the spinal nerves.There are several treatment options for LSS including physiotherapy, lumbar surgical decompression procedures such as laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Discectomy and more recently devices for interspinous distraction such as the XSTOP® and from May 2011 Minuteman™. Surgical decompression for LSS involves the removal of excess bone, ligament, and soft-tissue allowing more room for the nerves. The operation is usually preformed under general anaesthetic and with an average stay in hospital for 2-3 nights. Whereas the Minuteman™ implant is preformed as a day case under local or general anaesthetic and involves implanting the device into the space between two back bones to relieve pressure on the nerves and, therefore, pain in the legs. This is a multi centred (four sites) randomised controlled trial with a total sample of 50 participants after obtaining their informed consent. Participants will attend the pain clinic at the Hospitals for a baseline visit where they will be randomised with a ratio of 1:1 to receive either the Minuteman™ Interspinous interlaminar fusion Implant or standard surgical decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Following randomisation arrangements will be made for the participant to receive the randomised treatment. If allocated to Minuteman™ Implant, the treatment will be conducted by the Pain Specialist identified at the site. If allocated to surgical decompression, the treatment will be conducted by the neuro/spinal-surgeon identified at the site. Participates will be followed up regularly for 60 months post implant to assess clinical efficacy, safety, participants function and quality of life of each treatment.

Active21 enrollment criteria

First-In-Human Study of AK1320 Encapsulated Microspheres (AK1320 MS)

Degenerative SpondylolisthesisSpinal Stenosis

The safety and efficacy of AK1320 MS will be evaluated in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and concomitant symptomatic spinal stenosis who are undergoing decompression and single level instrumented posterolateral lumber autograft fusion surgery.

Active13 enrollment criteria
1...456...39

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs