Total Facet Arthroplasty System®(TFAS®) Clinical Trial
Spinal StenosisLow Back Pain4 moreThe Archus Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®) is a non-fusion spinal implant indicated for treatment of patients with moderate to severe spinal stenosis. TFAS® replaces the diseased facets following surgical removal. TFAS® offers the surgeon new options for treating spinal stenosis patients, enabling a more comprehensive decompression via complete removal of the facets. TFAS® also offers an alternative to rigid spinal fusion fixation enabling intervertebral motion. The clinical trial is intended to demonstrate restoration of stability and sagittal balance to the spine. TFAS® also eliminates the need for painful bone graft harvest from the patient's hip which may be required with fusion procedures.
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Degenerative Disc DiseaseSpondylolisthesis1 moreThis study is undertaken to evaluate the outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF). Specifically, the study seeks to measure outcomes on radiological imaging, outcomes reported by the patients on standardized questionnaires, and complication rates.
Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis...
Degenerative SpondylolisthesisSpinal StenosisDegenerative spondylolisthesis describes the slip of one spinal segment relative to the adjacent segment. It is usually associated with spinal stenosis (which limits one's ability to walk and stand) and is the most common indication for surgery in adults over age 65 years. A variety of surgical techniques are available; the most common are the Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion (PLF), and Interbody Fusion (IF) including Posterolateral Interbody Fusion (PLIF), and Transforaminal Interbody fusion (TLIF). IF uses a cage that is placed within the cleaned out disc space between the vertebral bodies being fused. Although this approach achieves a good fusion rate and deformity correction it is associated with a higher surgical cost and potential intra-operative complication rate. What is more, no consensus exists as to whether IF provides better patient rated functional outcome and quality of life. If the advantages of IF do not translate into superior patient rated outcomes, then the risk-benefit ratio would be tipped in favor of PLF. The purpose of this study is to determine if IF is equivalent to PLF for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The investigators will conduct a prospective randomized control trial comparing these two procedures. Our primary outcome measure will be the Oswestry Disability Index, which evaluates spinal pain and function.
Clinical Study of Bilateral Decompression With Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis
Lumbar SpondylolisthesisLaminectomy with PLIF has been shown to achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes, but it leads to potential adverse consequences associated with extensive disruption of posterior bony and soft-tissue structures. The investigators plan to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and laminectomy with posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Low Dose Ketamine Study on Opioid Tolerance and Hyperalgesia
Idiopathic ScoliosisSpondylolisthesisThe purpose of this study is to: 1. Establish whether ketamine can decrease opioid consumption and modulate the onset of opioid tolerance and prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia in pediatric subjects, ages 10 years to 18 years, undergoing posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation.
Post-market Study of the TOPS™ System
Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpondylolisthesisThis Single-Arm Post-Marketing Evaluation will gauge the improvement in function and pain for lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis patients with the TOPS System.
Unilateral Versus Bilateral TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Degenerative SpondylolisthesisTransforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionA prospective randomized controlled trial for comparison of radiologic outcomes of "single level transforaminal interbody fusion(TLIF) technique via unilateral versus bilateral facetectomy for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
SPIRA™-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent™-L/Perimeter™ and Recombinant BMP-2
Degenerative Disc DiseaseSpinal Stenosis2 moreA prospective, randomized, controlled clinical evaluation utilizing the SPIRA™ ALIF 3-D printed titanium interbody device with DBM vs a Medtronic PEEK ALIF interbody device with BMP
Comparative Study Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) and Intertransverse Process Fusion...
Lumbar SpondylolisthesisThe first technique described for interbody fusion was the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).(20) For this technique, the intervertebral disc is accessed through a retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach. While the posterior approach was first described by Russell Hibbs in 1911, in the 1950's, Cloward (7)popularized the posterior approach for a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
Spondylolisthesis Treated With an iO-Flex® System Enabled Decompression
RadiculopathySpondylolisthesis1 moreThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a decompression using the FDA cleared iO-Flex® System on-label in treating patients with spinal stenosis and stable grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using a precision estimate assuming a 55% positive response rate.