Active clinical trials for "Spondylolisthesis"

In many countries a majority of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis are operated on with decompression plus instrumented fusion, but the scientific evidence for adding fusion is controversial. To evaluate whether micro-decompression alone is as good as (non-inferior to) decompression plus instrumented fusion, a study with data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery was conducted, now the long-term follow up.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), is a common disorder of narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of the back. This causes discomfort in the legs when standing or walking because of pressure on the spinal nerves.There are several treatment options for LSS including physiotherapy, lumbar surgical decompression procedures such as laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Discectomy and more recently devices for interspinous distraction such as the XSTOP® and from May 2011 Minuteman™. Surgical decompression for LSS involves the removal of excess bone, ligament, and soft-tissue allowing more room for the nerves. The operation is usually preformed under general anaesthetic and with an average stay in hospital for 2-3 nights. Whereas the Minuteman™ implant is preformed as a day case under local or general anaesthetic and involves implanting the device into the space between two back bones to relieve pressure on the nerves and, therefore, pain in the legs. This is a multi centred (four sites) randomised controlled trial with a total sample of 50 participants after obtaining their informed consent. Participants will attend the pain clinic at the Hospitals for a baseline visit where they will be randomised with a ratio of 1:1 to receive either the Minuteman™ Interspinous interlaminar fusion Implant or standard surgical decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Following randomisation arrangements will be made for the participant to receive the randomised treatment. If allocated to Minuteman™ Implant, the treatment will be conducted by the Pain Specialist identified at the site. If allocated to surgical decompression, the treatment will be conducted by the neuro/spinal-surgeon identified at the site. Participates will be followed up regularly for 60 months post implant to assess clinical efficacy, safety, participants function and quality of life of each treatment.

The safety and efficacy of AK1320 MS will be evaluated in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and concomitant symptomatic spinal stenosis who are undergoing decompression and single level instrumented posterolateral lumber autograft fusion surgery.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of a full-scale multicenter randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two surgical treatments for a condition associated with lumbar spinal stenosis called degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Both treatments are currently used, but individual surgeons use different selection criteria for each treatment and use the procedures at different rates. The two procedures are decompression with fusion (the most common surgical procedure for spondylolisthesis) and midline-sparing decompression alone (which is also a standard treatment, but is not as widely used for treating spondylolisthesis). The investigators plan to collect the evidence on the following: The feasibility of the trial protocol, and Preliminary data on the effectiveness of each treatment.

Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (LDS) is a slippage of one vertebra over another caused by degeneration of facet joints, ligaments and intervertebral discs. Most patients suffer from symptoms related to spinal stenosis, such as radiating pain to the lower extremities, and typically increased pain in the lower limbs when walking upright and decreased when bending forward. There is a moderate grade of evidence for whether patients will achieve better outcome after surgery when decompression is followed by fusion. In theory, fusion following decompression should give more stability to the operated level, thus less pain and less progression of the olisthesis. On the other hand, fusion procedures, in general, are associated with more severe complications and postoperative mortality than decompression alone. In summary, there is still insufficient evidence for performing fusion in addition to decompression for patients with LDS. The investigators are planning a trial where the main aim is to detect whether the intervention-related difference in outcome between decompression alone (DA) and decompression followed by fusion with instrumentation (DF) is large enough to justify the use of the fusion procedure. The proposed trial is a randomized, controlled, multicentre, non- inferiority trial with two parallel groups, with 15 participating Norwegian hospitals. The main analysis will be performed 2 years after surgery with long-term follow-up planned at 5 and 10 years postoperatively.

The LimiFlex™ Clinical Trial is a prospective, concurrently controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of decompression and stabilization with the Empirical Spine LimiFlex™ Paraspinous Tension Band compared to decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with concomitant posterolateral fusion (PLF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (Grade I per Meyerding classification) with spinal stenosis. Clinical trial sites will enroll solely LimiFlex subjects or solely TLIF/PLF subjects.

The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS System) is more effective than transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) when used to stabilize a single lumbar level (L2 - L5) following surgical decompression in patients diagnosed with (1) at least moderate lumbar spinal stenosis, and (2) Grade 1 spondylolisthesis (or retrolisthesis), and (3) thickening of the ligamentum flavum or scarring of the facet joint capsule. Success will be assessed by means of a composite endpoint that measures improvement in in patient reported outcomes and the absence of any major device related complications.

In recent years there has been an increase in interest from surgeons in the use of synthetic bone graft substitutes to avoid the need of sourcing allograft or iliac crest autograft for use in spinal fusion procedures. This will be an open label, prospective, first in man, single-centre clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of Osteo3 ZP Putty synthetic bone graft in TLIF procedures with instrumentation. Safety and performance data obtained in this clinical study will be used to estimate clinical success rates achieved with the use of Osteo3 ZP Putty synthetic bone graft in TLIF procedures. No comparative control group is intended. The study is expected to run for approximately three years with each subject being followed up for a two- year post-operative period. The target is to recruit approximately 17 subjects to this clinical study, allowing for some subject attrition to get 15 evaluable.

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NB1 Bone Graft in subjects with degenerative disc disease undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. It is estimated that up to 30 participants will be enrolled in approximately 3 clinical sites. During baseline and follow-up assessments, patients will be asked to undergo x-rays and CT scans; adverse events and immunology will be collected, and; participants will be requested to complete participant questionnaires regarding quality of life, pain and function.

Retro-prospective study allowing inclusion of patients with spinal deformities treated by patient-specific rods (UNiD). This study aims to assess performance, clinical outcomes and safety