Weekly Cetuximab/RT Versus Weekly Cisplatin/RT in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma...
HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell CarcinomaA standard treatment for patients with head and neck cancer is radiation given with high doses of a chemotherapy drug called cisplatin, given every 3 weeks during the radiation. This treatment is effective but can significantly increase side effects such as difficulty with swallowing, a sore mouth, fatigue, hearing loss, ringing in the ears and kidney failure. In Australia, a commonly used treatment HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma is a lower dose of cisplatin given weekly during the radiation. The high dose and low dose schedules result in a similar total dose of cisplatin being given during the radiation, but it is thought that the weekly schedule results in fewer side effects while maintaining effectiveness. Another approach widely used around the world for patients with head and neck cancer, is to administer the antibody, cetuximab, weekly during radiation. Cetuximab has a very different side effect profile to cisplatin, and has been reported to result in less exacerbation of radiation related side effects. Both cetuximab and cisplatin can reduce the growth of a cancer and increase the effectiveness of radiation. Both cisplatin and cetuximab appear to be effective treatments in combination with radiation, but have not been directly compared. The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment related side effects (both acute and longer term) between the cisplatin and cetuximab regimens. Both treatments would be given with the same dose of radiation therapy over 7 weeks. The results of this trial will help determine the optimal treatment for patients with HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Paclitaxel Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Formulation and Carboplatin Followed By Chemoradiation...
Recurrent Salivary Gland CancerRecurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx9 moreThis phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation when given together with carboplatin followed by chemoradiation in treating patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation, carboplatin, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation followed by chemoradiation therapy may be an effective treatment for head and neck cancer.
Post-operative Radiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of...
Head and Neck CancerThe standard treatment of surgery followed by radiation therapy can stop tumors from growing in the head and neck region in most patients. However, the cancer can recur or can spread to other parts of the body. Cetuximab is a drug that may delay or prevent tumor growth by blocking certain cellular chemical pathways that lead to tumor development. It was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006 for the treatment of head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study is to determine how easily cetuximab can be added to treatment with radiation therapy in patients with cutaneous cancer of the head and neck. This study will also look at how well cetuximab added to radiation therapy works over time and how well this treatment is tolerated.
Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Cetuximab (PCC) With Cetuximab, Docetaxel, Cisplatin and Fluorouracil...
Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaThe goal of this clinical research study is to learn which chemotherapy combination is more effective in treating locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The side effects of these combinations will also be studied.
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Monalizumab Plus Cetuximab Compared to Placebo Plus Cetuximab...
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and NeckThis is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, global Phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of monalizumab and cetuximab, compared to placebo and cetuximab, in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.
Chemo-embolization for Head and Neck Cancer
SCCHNSquamous Cell CarcinomaThe study will evaluate whether adjuvant chemo-embolization increases progression free and/or overall survival relative to standard of care radiation and chemo- and/or immunotherapy in cisplatin-ineligible head and neck cancer patients with an acceptable morbidity rate.
Camrelizumab in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Squamous...
Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Camrelizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
A Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as First-line Treatment of Recurrent/Metastatic...
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckThe goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first line treatment in participants with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). No statistical hypothesis will be tested in this study.
Study of SO-C101 and SO-C101 in Combination With Pembro in Adult Patients With Advanced/Metastatic...
ThyroidRenal Cell Carcinoma17 moreA multicenter open-label phase 1/1b study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of SO-C101 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with selected advanced/metastatic solid tumors
A Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) With or Without Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) as First Line (1L)...
Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaThis is a study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) with or without lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) as a first line intervention in a PD-L1 selected population with participants with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Hypotheses include: Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab + placebo with respect to Objective Response Rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab + placebo with respect to Progression Free Survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib is superior to pembrolizumab + placebo with respect to overall survival (OS).