search

Active clinical trials for "Constriction, Pathologic"

Results 11-20 of 1124

Colchicine and Inflammation in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic Valve DiseaseAortic Valve Stenosis4 more

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world. Once symptomatic, untreated patients have a poor prognosis with five-year survival rate of 25%. Once at an advanced stage, AS will lead to the development of left ventricle hypertrophy, and eventually heart failure and death. At-present, there is no effective medical therapy for aortic stenosis. Current management of patients with AS consists of 'watchful waiting'. Valve replacement is needed when these patients (often acutely) become symptomatic. Recent studies have shown that inflammatory processes with similarities to atherosclerosis play an important role in AS. Therefore, we hypothesize that treatment with anti-inflammatory therapy, in the form of colchicine, could reduce the progression of AS. If positive, this trial will be the first to provide a potential therapeutic option for millions of people world-wide with AS.

Recruiting20 enrollment criteria

Safety and Efficacy of the CGuard™ Carotid Stent System in Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid Artery Stenosis

The objective of this pivotal study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CGuard™ Carotid Stent System in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) to a performance goal developed from published CAS literature.

Recruiting61 enrollment criteria

Comparison Between Transpapillary and Suprapapillary Metal Stent

Common Bile Duct Stricture

If surgical treatment is not possible in patients with malignant obstruction in the common bile duct, placing metal stents using endoscopy is a standardized treatment to resolve biliary obstruction. The metal stent is located in the bile duct to cover the stenotic portion by malignant tumors. The lower end of the metal stent can be located inside the common bile duct above the major ampulla or in the duodenum through the major ampulla. These two procedures with supra- or trans-papillary stents are currently being performed in general clinical practices, depending on the preference of the endoscopists. Until now, the comparison of the clinical results of the two procedures has been scarcely studied, and there is no prospective study yet. Therefore, researchers aim to compare the clinical results of two stent procedures through prospective randomized controlled studies.

Recruiting7 enrollment criteria

Portico and Navitor India Clinical Trial

Aortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve Failure2 more

The objective of this clinical trial is to collect data on procedural safety and device performance of the Portico and Navitor devices and FlexNav delivery system to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis in the Indian population.

Recruiting12 enrollment criteria

SLOW-Slower Progress of caLcificatiOn With Vitamin K2

Aortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve Calcification3 more

A randomized 12-month trial will include two groups of 100 individuals aged over 50 years, with asymptomatic mild to moderate Aortic valve stenosis (AVA > 1 cm2, Vmax < 4 m/s). The first group of 100 individuals will serve as the intervention group that will receive 300 mcg of K2 vitamin on a daily basis, while the second group of 100 individuals will be the control group that will receive placebo on a daily basis as well. Both groups will be monitored identically in order to investigate therapeutic effects on calcification and valve stenosis progression. Correlation with Mitral annulus and ascending Aorta.Exclusion criteria: Chronic Kidney disease, Vitamin K antagonists, statins, age < 50 y.o,prosthetic valves,Aortic Valve area (AVA) < 1cm2 ,Vmax > 4 m/s

Recruiting2 enrollment criteria

The Efemoral Vascular Scaffold System (EVSS) for the Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Peripheral...

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseVascular Diseases2 more

To evaluate the safety and performance of the EVSS in patients with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease from stenosis or occlusion of the femoropopliteal artery

Recruiting43 enrollment criteria

UNITY-B A Prospective, Multicentric, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the...

Biliary ObstructionBile Duct Stricture1 more

STUDY TYPE: Feasibility study STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to assess safety of the UNITY Balloon-expandable Biodegradable Biliary Stent System SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Clinical /Technical /Procedural success, Quality of Life improvement, biodegradation rate

Recruiting25 enrollment criteria

NKI Therapy Compared to Usual Care of Recurrent Esophagogastric Anastomotic Strictures

Esophageal StrictureAnastomotic Stenosis1 more

Rationale: The study hypothesizes that NKI followed by endoscopic bougie dilation therapy will result in an increased dysphagia-free period, a reduction of endoscopic procedures and dysphagia-related quality of life, and lower costs, when compared with the standard endoscopic bougie dilation (EBD) in recurrent esophagogastric anastomotic strictures. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of needle-knife incision (NKI) followed by EBD compared to standard EBD in patients with recurrent esophagogastric anastomotic strictures. Study design: This multicenter study is an randomized controlled trial in which NKI followed by EBD will be compared with standard EBD. Study population: Patients with recurrent dysphagia (at least 1 and a maximum of 5 previous dilations) due to an anastomotic esophagogastric stricture that requires treatment with repeated endoscopic bougie dilations. Intervention : The intervention to be investigated is the addition of NKI therapy to EBD to 18 mm esophageal diameter. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome of this study will be EBD-free time during follow-up of 6 months. Secondary outcome parameters will be the number of endoscopic procedures for treatment of dysphagia, quality of life (QoL), cost-reduction and cost-effectiveness.

Recruiting12 enrollment criteria

Efficacy and Tolerance Study of B-DYN Versus Conventional Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis...

Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is an extremely common condition affecting more than 102 million people each year. It is a narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back. It causes pain and even disorders of the lower limbs. When the symptoms get worse and the individual feels functional discomfort despite medical treatment, surgical intervention is recommended. Two surgical options are available: Rigid Stabilization Devices as conventional fusion with or without cage, or dynamic stabilization system as B-DYN device, this system is called "dynamic" because it allows the stabilization of the operated part while preserving a certain mobility. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of B-Dyn versus conventional bolted fusion (with or without cage) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) on the degree of postoperative functional incapacity. So the investigator's hypothesis is that the use of the B-DYN device in the treatment of DLS could lead to the maintenance of functional disability related to low back pain (maintenance of walking and mobility). Another important point to be demonstrated in this study is the preservation of the mobility of the stage overlying the assembly performed by B-Dyn. Indeed, the continued degeneration of segments adjacent to lumbar vertebral fusions is a concern for surgeons For B-Dyn, which is a dynamic stabilization, the combination of rigid and flexible parts allows the mobility of the overlying stage to be preserved and could also lead to a decrease in adjacent syndrome in the long-term compared to the use of conventional fusion. The duration of patient follow-up is 60 months. The inclusion period is 24 months to recruit the necessary number of subjects for the study (a total of 216 patients is expected).

Recruiting27 enrollment criteria

Comparison of Vessel-FFR Versus FFR in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Artery Stenoses

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study designed to assess whether vFFR is non-inferior to FFR in assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis in terms of the occurrence of MACE during 12 months after randomization.

Recruiting17 enrollment criteria
123...113

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs