search

Active clinical trials for "Stomach Neoplasms"

Results 1691-1700 of 2067

Early Recovery After Gastric Cancer Surgery

FastingMalignant Neoplasm of Stomach

Study preparation To progress this prospective study, the investigators analyzed the retrospective data of 426 patients who had been managed with conventional critical pathway after gastric cancer surgery during last 1 year. Through this retrospective analysis, we decided the inclusion criteria which showed significantly the lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay. Method for Prospective study Patients who enroll in this prospective study are administered and are supplied a liquid diet one day before surgery without bowel preparation. After gastric cancer surgery, they start sips of water on postoperative first day, and they are discharged once they exhibit at least three times soft diet without specific complaint and had normal clinical status and physical examination.

Unknown status10 enrollment criteria

ERAS (Early Recovery After Surgery) Protocol After Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy and Proximal Gastrectomy...

Gastric Cancer

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been introduced with purposes of reducing the surgical stress response and obtaining optimal recovery after surgery.

Unknown status7 enrollment criteria

Lymph Node 14v Dissection in Clinical Stage T3N+, T4N+ of Gastric Cancer

Gastric Cancer

The purpose of this study is to compare the survival rate according to the presence or absence of 14v lymph node dissection.

Unknown status31 enrollment criteria

Confocal Endoscopic Microscopy for Detection of Early Stage Gastric Cancer in Subjects With Hereditary...

Gastric CancerGastric Neoplasms

Background: People with hereditary gastric cancer syndrome are at increased risk of getting cancer in their stomach. These people should have regular endoscopies and biopsies to check for cancer if they are choosing to keep their stomach. Researchers want to see if they can improve the detection of cancer by endoscopy. Improved endoscopies could better detect early signs of cancer in people with this syndrome. Objective: To see if a small microscope attached to an endoscope to inspect the stomach lining is better than regular endoscopy to find the first signs of cancer in the stomach. Eligibility: People ages 18 and older who have a personal or family history of a hereditary gastric cancer syndrome or have a mutation that is known to lead to gastric cancer Design: Participants will be screened over the phone or in person with: Personal and family medical history Review of their medical records Participants will have a physical exam. Then they will be put under general anesthesia. They will have an endoscopy. A lighted tube will be inserted into the mouth and go down to the stomach. First, the standard device will be used. Then participants will be injected with fluorescein. This is a contrast agent. Then the microscope will be added to the tube and the endoscopic evaluation of the stomach will be repeated. During the procedure, biopsies will be taken from different areas of the stomach. Participants will be observed for a few hours after the procedure. About 14 days after the endoscopy, participants will be asked to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit. This visit can also be conducted over the phone.

Completed13 enrollment criteria

Artificial Intelligence Versus Expert Endoscopists for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Gastric Cancer

Title: A single-center, retrospective randomized controlled trial of artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert endoscopists for diagnosis of gastric cancer in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Précis: this single-center, retrospective randomized controlled trial will include 500 outpatients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for gastric cancer screening and will compare the diagnostic detection rate for gastric cancer of AI and expert endoscopists. Objectives Primary Objective: to evaluate the diagnostic detection rate for gastric cancer of AI and expert endoscopists. Secondary Objectives: to determine whether AI is not inferior to expert endoscopists in terms of the number of images analyzed for diagnosis of gastric cancer and intersection over union (IOU), and the detection rate of diagnosis of early and advanced gastric cancer. Endpoints Primary Endpoint: diagnosis of gastric cancer. Secondary Endpoints: image based diagnosis of gastric cancer and IOU. Population: in total, 500 males and females aged ≥ 20 years who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for screening of gastric cancer at a single hospital in Japan. Describe the Intervention: AI-based diagnosis of gastric cancer based on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy images. Study Duration: 3 months.

Completed4 enrollment criteria

Tissue Procurement for Gastric Cancer, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST), Esophageal Cancer,...

Gastric Cancers

The purpose of this study is to collect and store normal and malignant tissue from patients with gastric cancer, GIST, esophageal cancer, pancreas cancer, hepatocellular cancer, biliary cancer, neuroendocrine, peritoneal mesothelioma, anal cancer and colorectal cancer, an estimated 50 to 100 of each tumor type. To collect and store blood samples from patients with gastric cancer, GIST, esophageal cancer, pancreas cancer, hepatocellular cancer, biliary cancer, neuroendocrine, peritoneal mesothelioma, anal cancer and colorectal cancer. To create a database for the collected tissue and allow access to relevant clinical information for current and future protocols. To create tissue microarrays for each gastrointestinal cancer subtype, namely, gastric cancer, GIST, esophageal cancer, pancreas cancer, hepatocellular cancer, biliary cancer, neuroendocrine, peritoneal mesothelioma, anal cancer and colorectal cancer, to facilitate future molecular studies. To grant access to Dr Kindler, Dr. Salgia, and Dr. Catenacci to this database (as it is being acquired) of the coupled patient tissue samples (normal and malignant) and relevant clinical information for the investigation of tyrosine kinases, such as Met and Ron, receptor tyrosine kinase family members, STATs, paxillin, focal adhesion proteins, cell motility/migration proteins, tyrosine/serine/threonine kinase family members, related molecules, and downstream targets implicated in the pathogenesis of GI cancers. Examples of molecular testing include evaluation of DNA mutation, alternative splice variants, protein expression and phosphorylation, and immunohistochemistry on samples. These studies will be correlated with clinical information as stated above.

Suspended1 enrollment criteria

Palliative Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Phase II Trial

Gastric Cancer

The hypothesis of this study is that a radiotherapy dose of 36Gy in 12 fractions, which equates to a BED of 48.6Gy, increases the response rates of symptom relief compared to historical controls.

Unknown status8 enrollment criteria

Proteiomic Fingerprints of Gastric Juice

Gastric Cancer

No accurate, inexpensive and non-invasive test for gastric cancer screening is currently available. The investigators' recent study identified a1-antitrypsin and other proteins as potential biomarkers of gastric cancer in gastric juice. The aim of this study was to develop a novel non-invasive modality for detecting gastric cancer by measurement of biomarkers in gastric juice.

Completed4 enrollment criteria

A Comparison Between D1 and D2 Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Cancer : A Prospective Randomized Controlled...

Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer remains the second most common cancer worldwide.Although the prognosis is poor for majority of patients , long term survival is achievable in patients in whom surgical resection is possible. However the results of surgery are generally disapointing in most large series.The exception to this appears to be Japan and far east where a standardized approach to surgery is undertaken with low morbidity and mortality.The extent of surgery and particularly the development of systematic lymphadenectomy(D2)has been credited in Japan for the improved outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Hence for comparing the difference between D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in terms of overall survival,disease free survival and loco regional recurrence and also post operative morbidity and mortality following both these procedures,this study has been undertaken. In D1 lymphadenectomy, only those lymph nodes which are adjacent to the part of stomach being resected will be removed.In D2 lymphadenectomy other lymph nodes draining the stomach will also be removed according to internationally accepted guidelines and also include resection of greater omentum along with anterior layer of transverse mesocolon and lesser omentum upto its attachment to hepatoduodenal ligament. Currently both these procedures are widely practised worldwide and there is no definite evidence showing the superiority of one procedure over the other.Neither is any of these procedures experimental. We are doing this trial to see whether one of these procedures is superior to the other.

Unknown status10 enrollment criteria

ICG-NIR Guided Lymph Node Dissection in Gastric Cancer

Stomach Neoplasm

As the survival rate of patients with gastric cancer has increased, there has been a growing interest in interventions that improve postoperative quality of life. Therefore minimally invasive surgery or endoscopic resection has been performed much more frequently. However, adequate lymph node dissection is important as well. The aim of the study is to identify the feasibility of indocyanine green - near infra-red (ICG-NIR) guided sentinel lymph node dissection for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Unknown status13 enrollment criteria
1...169170171...207

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs