Active clinical trials for "Hematoma, Subdural"

Compare rates of medical complications, recurrence and outcome in 2 randomized groups of patients with surgical chronic subdural hematomas. The intervention group will be assigned to early mobilization (within 12 hours of the surgical procedure). The control group will be assigned to bed rest for 48 hours.

DECIDE (Bedside versus Operating Room Burr-Hole DrainagE of ChronIc SubDural HEmatoma) CSDH is an abnormal collection of blood between the layers of the brain causing brain tissue compression leading to neurological complications. One of the most common risk factors contributing to CSDH is head trauma, which is usually in the form of a minor head injury. Older individuals are at increased risk of CSDH due to brain atrophy that occurs with advancing age as well as their tendency to fall and sustain minor head traumas. Chronic alcoholics are also at increased risk as alcoholism also leads to brain atrophy, increased risk of falls, and liver failure which results in increased bleeding risk. Also many drugs used today like anticoagulants, antithrombotics, and antiplatelets for certain health conditions are other common risk factors for CSDH. The overall goal of this multi-centered trial in the USA and Canada is to assess the surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) and to demonstrate the effectiveness of bedside drainage and its safety as it bypasses the perioperative risk associated with anesthetic especially among the elderly. Adult patients with a clear indication for CSDH drainage will be randomly assigned to one of two procedures. One group will receive the twist drill procedure which can be performed at the bedside. The second group will undergo the burr-hole drainage procedure in the operating room usually under general anesthetic. Typically, the twist drill procedure can occur sooner as the operating room and Anesthetist are not required. Reoccurrence of the CSDH will be assessed over a period of 6 months following drainage. Timing of procedure, risk of infection, adverse side effects and neurological functioning will also be measured. Over a 3 year study period, 486 eligible patients (243 patients per arm) will be enrolled. Patients > 18 years with confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic CSDH will be provided one of the two procedures and will be followed for study outcomes at 1, 3 and 6 months following the procedure. Primary analysis will be to compare the surgical procedures, assessing the recurrence rate of CSDH within 6 months of initial CSDH drainage. The ultimate goal of this study is to standardize bedside drainage as the treatment of choice for CSDH management. This trial is important in the ongoing search for more efficient and safe intervention strategies.

The aim of this randomized, blinded, placebo controlled clinical study is to compare the peri- and postoperative bleeding and cardiovascular complication rates of patients undergoing burr-hole trepanation for chronic subdural hematoma with and without discontinuation of low-dose aspirin

To evaluate Efficacy and Safety of oral Atorvastatin and Dexamethasone on conservative treatment for Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) patients with Coagulation Disorders

Anti-aggregation therapy, including treatment with low-dose aspirin (LDA) is an established risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage, including chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH); however evidence guiding the decision to continue or discontinue LDA in patients who have sustained mild head trauma with no sign of injury on CT is lacking. The investigators aim to assess whether continued aspirin treatment increases the risk of CSDH in mild head trauma patients 50 years and older who present with negative head CT. The investigators further aim to use the initial findings to refine the study design, with the goal of performing a larger, multi-institutional study in the future. Over a 12-month period, approximately 100 patients ≥50 years of age on LDA prophylaxis presenting to Hadassah's Emergency Department after sustaining mild head injury, will be examined by the neurosurgeon on call. Those who have no sign of intracranial hemorrhage at clinical or CT examination, and who meet inclusion / exclusion criteria, will be invited to participate in a randomized study. Informed consent will be obtained. Patients will be remotely randomized for continuation or cessation of LDA treatment. Follow-up CT and clinical examination will be performed 3-5 weeks after trauma. The two-proportions test will be used to assess whether there is a statistically significant difference in the rate of CSDH in patients randomized to cessation of LDA therapy and those randomized to continuation of LDA. Relationships between the explanatory the dependent variables will be explored with classical parametric and nonparametric statistical methods, including multivariate analysis, logistic regression, the two proportions test, and the independence test. Several measures of association/correlation between pairs of variables will be analyzed as well. The investigators hypothesize that continuation of LDA will not be associated with increased risk for chronic subdural hematoma, and that cessation of treatment will not be associated with a decrease in chronic subdural hematoma. The investigators further hypothesize that cessation of LDA for this period will not be associated with increased risk for clinically significant cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, thrombotic, of embolic event.

Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is a common hematologic problem particularly in older patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization compared to traditional surgical strategies for patients presenting with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Although MMA embolization is minimally-invasive procedure that is routinely used for the treatment of tumors or vascular formations (1), this study investigates the use of an established procedure for a new disease state.

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a collection of blood and its breakdown products in the subdural compartment. It is a condition frequently seen in any neurosurgical practice. cSDH is believed to arise from tearing of bridging veins as a result of trauma, which may be minor and unapparent to the patient. Management of cSDH is widely varied. A "wait-and-see" or "wait-and-rescan" approach may be acceptable in asymptomatic patients with a relatively small hematoma whilst cSDH with severe neurological deficits or decreased level of consciousness may require surgical decompression by burr-hole craniostomy, twist drill craniostomy or craniotomy. Surgery is associated with serious morbidity and mortality of up to 17% and recurrence rates of 4%-33% requiring further treatment in some instances.The safety and efficacy of different neurosurgical procedures have been evaluated but there is a paucity of well-designed randomized controlled trials in the literature. Consequently, there is no consensus on the best treatment with respect to surgical technique, pre-operative and post-operative management and nonsurgical alternatives including the use of Corticosteroids, Tranexamic acid, Osmotic diuretics, Atorvastatin or Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Corticosteroids may be a therapeutic option in the management of cSDH. There is very little data on the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of cSDH and certainly no randomized trials. The purpose of the study is to prove dexamethasone can be just as efficacious as surgery in treating chronic subdural hematoma. The investigators also hope to show that those patients treated with dexamethasone suffer less complication compared to those who undergo surgery.

This is a prospective randomised-controlled multi-centre trial based in Hong Kong to determine whether temporary subdural drain placement after burr hole evacuation of a chronic subdural haematoma can reduce the risk of recurrence. Consecutive patients, 60 years old or above, diagnosed to have symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma and indicated for burr hole operative drainage will be randomly allocated into one of two groups: (1) for intra-operative subdural drain placement (intervention group) or (2) not for drain placement (control group). Using web-based software block randomisation with an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be conducted. Instructions to use or not to use a drain will be contained in a sealed envelopes labelled with sequential study numbers. Intra-operatively, if the surgeon-in-charge judges that after burr hole evacuation of the haematoma the patient's condition is unsafe for drain placement, the subject will be excluded from the study. Otherwise, randomisation will be performed at this juncture by the opening of the sealed envelop. The procedure involves placing a prefabricated silicon drain into the subdural space according to a standard protocol and will be removed on the second post-operative day at the bedside. Subjects in whom the operating surgeon judges that drain placement is unsafe will be excluded from the study. Drainage is undertaken passively by hanging the collection bag at the bedside in a dependent position. In addition to general demographic, clinical and radiological presentation data, potential risk factors for recurrence will be documented. Serial computed tomography brain scans will be arranged (before discharge, at four weeks and six months) and the occurence of significant subdural haematoma recurrence requiring repeat operative drainage at six months will be recorded. Other outcome measures to be determined at regular time intervals for a total follow-up period of six months (upon discharge, at four weeks and six months) include: functional performance in terms of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and modified Rankin Scale, added neurological deficit, death and other surgery-related complications. All outcomes will be documented by the trial investigators or by the responsible clinician. The data obtained will be analysed according to the principle of intention to treat. Hypothesis: compared to burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma alone (control), the additional placement of a subdural drain after evacuation (intervention) will reduce the risk of recurrence requiring repeat surgery.

This study compare general anesthesia versus locoregional anesthesia for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. Half of participant will be operated under general anesthesia, while the other half will be operated under locoregional anesthesia.

In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial shall patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) recruited, who were surgically treated. Initially, we would divide the patients randomized into two groups: Patients with supervised blow-maneuver and without. After surgical treatment of cSDH with insertion of a subdural drain, one group would perform a supervised blow maneuver ("Valsalva maneuver") every hour for five minutes from 10:00 to 20:00. In the other group, the standard care would be performed. The subdural drain would be explanted 2days after operation and a postoperative CT scan would routinely be performed. After hospital discharge, the patient would be rechecked in an ambulant setting and would receive CT scan as clinical standard. Recurrence of hematoma is defined as recurrent hematoma which should be reoperated. After 3 and 6 months we would evaluate the outcome of patients.