Active clinical trials for "Substance-Related Disorders"

To estimate the efficacy of a structured, scalable and replicable psychosocial intervention targeting refugees living in Jordan, Amman who have been forced to flee their homes due to regional conflicts.

Peer support is historically prominent for substance use disorder (SUD), such as the world-wide model of Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step groups. Yet for trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) there have been few attempts at peer help. A major challenge of trauma peer groups is that they usually focus on telling the story of members' trauma histories, which can be overly triggering and distressing. Seeking Safety offers an excellent choice for peer-led care. It is an evidence-based and is the most widely adopted model for SUD/PTD. It is present-focused, cognitive-behavioral, and provides psychoeducation and coping skills to help clients attain greater safety in their lives. It has been successfully implemented in peer-led format for many years and has been studied in various trials, including a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing peer versus professional delivery, with positive results. In Phase 1 we developed a beta version of a mobile app for peer-led Seeking Safety (PLSS). In Phase 2 we will enhance the app features and content and also conduct an RCT in a sample of adults with current SUD/PTSD to compare the Peer Safety app condition to a control app.

The project will assess the effect of opportunistically treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection immediately when HCV-infected people who inject drugs are hospitalized for acute care in psychiatric, interdisciplinary specialized drug treatment or somatic wards. We will compare this approach with the current standard of care (SOC), which is referral to the outpatient clinic at the medical department following discharge.

Effective treatment for opioid use disorders (OUDs) requires medications. Two medications for treating OUDs-buprenorphine and injectable naltrexone-can be prescribed in primary care (PC). However, despite the current opioid epidemic and expert recommendations that OUDs should be treated in PC, most PC clinics do not offer treatment for OUDs. This reflects a lack of consensus among health system leaders and clinicians that OUDs should be treated in PC. The PRimary care Opioid Use Disorders treatment (PROUD) Trial is a pragmatic cluster-randomized, quality improvement trial that evaluates implementation of a team-based approach to PC supported by a full time nurse (the "PROUD intervention"). This type of team-based PC is often referred to as "collaborative care" for management of OUDs in PC, and this type of trial is often referred to as a Hybrid Type III implementation trial. The trial is being conducted in 6 diverse health systems spanning 5 states (New York, Florida, Michigan, Texas, and Washington), with 2 PC clinics in each system randomized. One clinic is randomly selected to implement the PROUD intervention and the other continues usual PC (UPC). The overall objective of the PROUD trial is to provide information to guide health system leaders who are faced with the decision of whether or not to treat OUDs in PC, by evaluating the benefits of implementing the PROUD intervention that integrates high quality OUD treatment (i.e. buprenorphine or injectable naltrexone) into the normal flow of PC. The primary objective of the PROUD trial is to evaluate whether the PROUD intervention increases OUD treatment with buprenorphine or injectable naltrexone, documented in the electronic health records (EHRs) of PC patients, over a 2 year follow-up, as compared to UPC. The primary hypothesis is that there will be a significant increase in the number of patient-days of medication treatment for OUDs documented in the EHR of PC patients in the 2 years after clinics are randomized to the PROUD intervention compared to PC clinics randomized to UPC. This implementation objective reflects whether the PROUD intervention increases initiation of and/or retention in OUD treatment, documented in EHRs within medical settings. The main secondary objective is to test the hypothesis that PC patients with OUDs documented in their EHRs in the 3 years prior to randomization who receive care in PROUD intervention clinics, compared to those who receive care in UPC clinics, will have fewer days of acute care utilization (including urgent care, emergency department [ED] and hospital care) in the 2 years after randomization. This effectiveness objective assesses whether implementation of the MA Model improves patient outcomes.

This study aims to determine whether referral to the Bridge Clinic reduces overall index hospital length of stay when compared to direct referral to a long-term outpatient addiction provider for patients with active opioid use disorder (OUD) being considered for medications-for-addiction treatment (MAT).

Title of research: A preliminary RCT of an online mindfulness-based cognitive intervention for Chemsex Research aim: To determine how an online mindfulness-based cognitive intervention, might reduce Chemsex engagement, risky sexual behaviours, sexual self-efficacy and increase overall wellbeing among men who have sex with men. Research intention: If the mindfulness based cognitive intervention reduces Chemsex engagement and risky sexual behaviours and supports sexual and general wellbeing, then we would repeat this study on a larger scale within the National Health Service among men who have sex with other men and who engage in Chemsex. Both academic output and dissemination accordingly. A brief overview of intervention: Chemsex, sometimes coined as Chemfun, is a term used to describe the use of psychoactive substances with the intention of enhancing and/or facilitating the sexual experience/arousal and predominates among gay and bisexual men. Chemsex drugs tend to include, γ-hydroxybutyric acid and congeners, methamphetamine, mephedrone, erectile dysfunction agents, and alkyl nitrites often in combination. A growing body of research has suggested that mindfulness supports minimize drug using behaviors HIV stress and risky sexual behaviours. However, there appears no current mindfulness intervention that has been evidenced for Chemsex. Our intervention is hoped to become part of a multidisciplinary approach in supporting Chemsex which includes a cross-over effect between drugs, sexual well-being, and general wellbeing. Quantitatively, the research is structured so that participants will be randomized to either the experimental or control group (n=20 experimental; n=20 control waitlist). The MBCI for each group is 1 month (4 wks experimental and 4 wks waitlist control). This is followed by a 3-month follow-up to determine the sustainability of this intervention. Qualitatively, participants will be asked approx 8 open-ended feedback questions forming part of 4 groups of 10, at the 3-month follow-up.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of exposure to stigma reduction message frames communicated by visual campaigns and narrative vignettes among a national sample of health professionals.

Missed appointments to outpatient substance use treatment are common and costly and can have a negative effect on the health of patients. In this quasi-experimental study, the investigators used an on-off design to examine whether a reminder "plus" intervention (telephone call from therapist before first appointment) would increase attendance and improve cancellation and rebooking practices. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction with treatment and intention to complete the treatment program.

The investigators will conduct a phase I study involving 41 participants selected randomly among patients prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid misuse as a feasibility trial of the study of the Pillsy device. The study will track the effectiveness of the Pillsy technology and associated smartphone application by measuring adherence to buprenorphine-naloxone therapy and patient satisfaction with the application and the Pillsy device.

The goal of this [type of study: exercise intervention study] is to test in describe participant health conditions. The main questions it aims to answer are: [Whether physical exercise improves executive function of male heroin addicts] [Whether physical exercise improves negative thinking/affect psychological experience of male heroin addicts] Participants will be randomly selected for medium-intensity strength training (resistance exercise,n=30), 30 will be selected for 1-hour long balloon volleyball sessions (aerobic exercise) at 60-70% volume of oxygen uptake during peak exercise, weekly 5 times for 12 weeks; and 30 will be assigned to the no-exercise control group, Participants will perform Executive function tests and the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised questionnaire at pre and post intervention. Researchers will compare resistance exercise group,aerobic exercise group and no-exercise control group to see if effects of exercise on executive function and negative thinking/affect psychological experience of male heroin addicts.