Active clinical trials for "Surgical Wound"

This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, comparator-controlled clinical study to compare MAR-CUTIS with Dermabond Advanced in closure of surgical incisions and lacerations less than or equal to (<=)15 centimeter (cm). Eligible participants were randomized 2:1 to MAR-CUTIS or Dermabond Advanced.

Context: The hyperglycemia is an important independent risk factor for the Surgical Site Infection (SSI) development among liver transplantation recipients. Objective: To evaluate the effects of an intensive postoperative protocol of blood glucose management on the surgical site infection incidence among liver transplantation recipients. Material and methods: It is an open-label clinical trial that will be randomized into 2 groups of blood glucose (BG) control: patients will undergo BG control regular in the facility chosen to research development (BG targeted 130-180 mg/dL) and the second one will undergo intensive BG control (BG targeted 80 - 130 mg/dL) until patients are eating at least 50% of a full liquid diet or receiving bolus tube feedings. A computer program will be employed to generate the randomized schedule that will be put into sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes by an external expert to research. A finger prick device will be used to measure the blood glucose. A blinded adjudication committee to analyse the primary endpoint SSI will adopt the SSI criteria given by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The research proposal will be registered on ClinicalTrials.gov database. Central tendency and dispersion measures, Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier estimated and Log-rank test will be used for data analyses. Expected outcomes: The results of the study should contribute to establishing better clinical practices on glycemic control in the liver transplantation recipient's postoperative period aiming to reduce SSI incidence and its associated morbidity and mortality.

This study evaluates the current surgical practices at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in comparison to the World Health Organization's Surgical Unit Based Safety Programme guidelines and aims to determine how deviations from those guidelines are associated with varying rates of surgical site infection incidence in this population. The results of this study will help elucidate risk factors for surgical site infection and prioritize future interventions to decrease the rate of surgical site infection at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, as well as other low and middle-income hospitals. The data collected regarding surgical site infection rates will also prove beneficial in measuring outcomes of any interventions that are developed as a result of this study.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the light-emitting diode (LED) in promoting healing of the wound on lower leg as a result of surgery. Wounds on the lower leg heal more slowly than wounds on the head and neck; they can also remain deep red for six months to one year. Doctors usually allow a lower leg surgical wound to heal by itself, without stitches or other additional treatment. This is because leg wounds do not hold stitches well and stitches could cause other problems. A major drawback of allowing a surgical wound on the lower leg to heal by itself is the long healing time that can often take months. The investigators wish to evaluate if the LED light treatment of the surgical wound will improve the healing of your wound. In order to test if leg wounds heal faster after treatment with LED, half of the patients in the study will receive the LED (Group 2) and half will not receive treatment with LED but will receive a "sham light" treatment (Group 1). Essentially, a sham light treatment refers to regular light (not LED) exposure for 20 minutes. The sham light comes from the same device as the treatment light (Omnilux machine) however, this light has no anticipated effects on wound healing and is used simply to reduce the amount of bias that sometimes complicates the results of these studies. There is no added risk or benefit for the patients in the control group exposed to the sham light. Both groups will receive the standard care of wounds on the lower extremity.

This is a double-blind , randomized, controlled, two-arm study aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Polyheal-2 vs PolyHeal, in once daily application as compared to historical control. The study will enroll adult subjects with post traumatic/post surgical, venus insufficiency and diabetic hard to heal wounds who meet the entrance criteria which will be followed for 12 weeks.

To evaluate the efficacy of honey as a post surgical exit site care process to promote healing and prevent infectious bacterial colonization of newly created exit sites. It has been shown in the medical literature that honey has properties that are conducive to healing and the prevention of infection. In one study it was demonstrated that in urethral injury in the rat treated with honey the injury healed with none of the usual formation of fibrous tissue seen in such healing processes, that there was no reduction in the luminal diameter usually seen, and that the cells lining the urethra were uncompromised in any way, i.e. totally normal and healthy. We feel that if an exit site can be healed quickly with good normal tissue being developed that the patient will have a much better chance to keep that exit healthy reducing time, cost, and disruption of lifestyle. Other positive aspects of honey are it has the low pH required for good healthy tissue healing, it works in the presence of wound fluids, and it has never been shown to produce a resistant bacterial strain.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using Seraffix LTB system for excisional biopsy wounds closure

This is a prospective, multi-center, open label study evaluating the performance of PICO14 NPWT in the management of chronic open wounds (pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, diabetes related foot ulcers), dehisced surgical wounds and closed surgical incisions. The study comprises the Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) for a new variant of an established product. PICO 14 is based on another dressing called PICO. The primary objective is to evaluate functional performance of PICO 14 through verification of delivery of negative pressure and wound exudate management.

This study is being conducted to see how safe and effective the Prevena Incision Management System "Prevena" is when placed over a renal transplantation incision. Prevena provides negative pressure (suction) wound therapy. Prevena will be tested while applied during the time each subject is hospitalized and up to 5 days after the surgery. Prevena is a small portable negative pressure device which consists of a therapy unit that delivers negative pressure. It also includes a dressing system that is intended for use over closed incisions after surgery. The intent of this study is to evaluate Prevena versus the standard care that a doctor would use normally after a kidney transplant.

The use of topical beta-blockers, such as 0.25% timolol, in promoting wound healing is currently emerging in the academic literature. The investigators will enroll 82 patients who have their skin cancer surgically removed resulting in the need of a full-thickness skin graft. The objective of this randomized safety study is to determine the safety and efficacy of 0.25% timolol in promoting wound healing in full-thickness skin grafts compared to standard of care.