Active clinical trials for "Tachycardia"

In this study, we are comparing the difference in outcomes between patients who were given shocks to the heart, during the upstroke of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and before CPR is started. The study population will be all cardiac arrest patients attended by the staff of the Emergency Department who fulfil the eligibility criteria. Patients will be managed according to currently approved cardiac arrest protocols. Patients confirmed in cardiac arrest have manual chest compressions started while mechanical CPR (whereby chest compressions are delivered by an automated device) is prepared. Mechanical CPR should be started as soon as possible (<1 minute). If patients are eligible to be shocked, they will receive shocks either during upstroke of CPR or before CPR is started. Thus the purpose of this study is to answer the question whether are there improvement in survival between when shocks are given during upstroke and before CPR is started.

This clinical trial is a multi center, prospective, randomized, parallel study designed to compare septal to apical ICD lead placement.

This study evaluates the impact of a new pacing mode avoiding unnecessary ventricular stimulation in combination with advanced dual chamber detection with slow VT management on the clinical outcome for hospitalization and mortality and inadequate therapy in medically stable, ICD-indicated patients with impaired left ventricular function (LVEF ≤ 40%) who do not have pacing indications and no indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). It compares a new pacing mode avoiding ventricular stimulation when not needed combined with dual chamber detection with a pure ventricular back up pacing and single chamber detection criteria with pure ventricular back up pacing. Therapies are compared in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel trial with a 24-month randomized treatment period. Randomization follows a 1:1 ratio. ICD therapy is enabled for all patients throughout the study. All patients receive optimal drug therapy for arrhythmia and heart failure treatment.

The investigators performed a prophylactic peroperative linear lesions connecting the tricuspid annulus with a right atriotomy and the atriotomy with the inferior caval vein to prevent atrial flutter on 15 consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Conduction time between electrodes placed on both sides of the lesions is measured on the second postoperative day. Coronary angiography and electrophysiology study using an electroanatomic mapping system to assess conduction across the line are performed three month after the operation.

The goal of APART is the assessment of the therapeutic and preventive stimulation algorithms of the Medtronic AT500 and following devices in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias and an indication for cardiac pacing according to the German guidelines. Medication is controlled throughout the study with a beta-blocker as the only antiarrhythmic drug.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-dependent effects of ONO-1101 on efficacy and safety in patients with postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

To determine whether electrophysiologic study (EPS) or Holter monitoring (HM) was the better method for selecting effective long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or an episode of aborted sudden death.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening cardiac rhythm disturbance which leads to sudden cardiac death (SCD), ventricular fibrillation, electrical storm, hemodynamic collapse, and syncope. VT patients with cardiomyopathy (diseased/scarred cardiac muscle) have the highest risk of SCD (<1-4%) and recurrent VTs (15-35%). Although an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective treatment option to prevent SCD, it does not eliminate it. Without VT prevention, recurrent VT and ICD shocks may increase the risk of heart failure and death. The primary objective is to determine the optimal treatment strategy to maximize event-free survival among cardiomyopathy patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) by the creation of a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort. Also, the investigators will evaluate the epidemiology of VT, adherence to guidelines, safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of current treatment options for secondary prevention of VT in the real-world Canadian VT population.

Over the last decade, radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has become an established treatment for ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Due to the challenging nature of visualizing lesion formation in real time and ensuring an effective transmural lesion, different surrogate measures of lesion quality have been used. The Ablation Index (AI) is a variable incorporating power delivery in its formula and combining it with CF and time in a weighted equation which aims at allowing for a more precise estimation of lesion depth and quality when ablating VAs. AI guidance has previously been shown to improve outcomes in atrial and ventricular ablation in patients with premature ventricular complexes (PVC). However research on outcomes following AI-guidance for VT ablation specifically in patients with structural disease and prior myocardial infarction remains sparse. We aim at conducting a prospective observational multicenter registry investigating the efficacy and safety of AI-guided VA ablation in patient with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Ventricular Tachycardia storm is a medical emergency characterized by three or more episodes of ventricular arrhythmia within 24 hours and associated with a significantly increased mortality and massive health resource utilization. Several therapies are utilized including sympathetic blockade (through deep sedation and beta blockers), antiarrhythmic drugs, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reprograming where applicable, and catheter ablation. Despite standard intervention, mortality rates remain high and additional therapeutic options are actively being investigated. The overall objective of this proposal is to investigate whether transcutaneous magnetic stimulation designed to inhibit the left stellate ganglion can be used in this population. This is a single-center, randomized, sham-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the left stellate ganglion to treat patients with ventricular tachycardia storm.