Active clinical trials for "Thromboembolism"

COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Registry of University Hospital of Ioannina. Retrospective datasource registry with quantitative and qualitative patient data from the hospital medical records. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory parameters are recorded on 7 different time points (day: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15) concerning 793 variables of interest in an electronic (computerised) database. Patients are also followed-up after 90 days from hospital discharge (number of visits of follow-up depends on patient's health status) at the Post-COVID and Long-term effects of coronavirus (long COVID) outpatient clinic of University Hospital of Ioannina. Data from this outpatient clinic are also recorded in an electronic database (189 variables of concern for each patient)

This prospective nationwide registry aims to assess the durability of left atrial appendage occlusion when performed via totally thoracoscopic, percutaneous and hybrid- minimally invasive approaches and collect information on possible adverse events.

This is a phase 4 cohort prospective, open, national, multicentre study that collects data on history of patients treated chronically with anticoagulant drugs, including the novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The Registry is designed solely for observational purposes and is not intended to have any influence on the treatment of the single patients included. Patients are included when they start the anticoagulant treatment, whatever the drug used, or when they shift from a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) drug to one of the novel direct oral anticoagulants, provided that the therapy is expected to last at least 3 months. The general aims of the study are to provide a better evaluation of efficacy and safety of different treatment options, and to improve our understanding of the risks/benefits of the various anticoagulant drugs and the different therapy options. The Registry is open to the participation of clinical centres or individual professionals (now called Participants) that are involved with management of anticoagulated patients.

Epidemiological data on pulmonary embolism (PE) in China needs to be updated and reported. The China Pulmonary Thromboembolism Registry Study (CURES) is designed to provide the cross-sectional spectrum and chronological trends of PE in China, as well as to reveal the intrinsic etiology and pathogenesis of the disease. The CURES is an ongoing large prospective multicenter registry, which was originally initiated in January 2009 via enrolling suspected or confirmed PE or PE with DVT (deep venous thrombosis) patients and assessed their in-hospital outcomes from 100 medical centers in the China PE-DVT network. As of July 2011, in order to determine the PE-relevant short-term outcomes, enrolled participants were followed-up for at least three months in a longitudinal manner. Since August 2016, with the launch and development of precision medicine research scheme in China, the main principle investigators of CURES decided to collect enrolled patients' blood samples with regular follow-ups every three or six months for at least two years (for long-term outcomes). The study protocol has been approved by the China-Japan Friendship Hospital ethics committee, and all collaborating centers received approvals from their local ethics committee. All patients provided written or verbal informed consent to their participation.

To evaluate treatment outcomes of patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism.

Venous thromboembolism is a common and serious complication in cancer, and is associated with a substantially increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, VTE may be the earliest sign of cancer. Recent studies, however, fail to show a clinical benefit of extended cancer screening in this patient population. Better risk prediction models are therefore warranted to identify VTE patients who would benefit from a rapid and extensive cancer screening. Inflammation and hypercoagulability are considered hallmarks of cancer, and emerging light is being shed on the potential of various markers of inflammation and coagulation in cancer diagnostics and prognostics. Among the inflammatory and thrombotic processes linked to cancer is the neutrophil release of web-like nuclear chromatin (DNA and histones), referred to as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Driven by the tumor environment, NETs have recently been shown to play a central role in tumor progression, metastasis, and tumor-associated thrombosis. The investigators hypothesize that an enhanced inflammatory state may be predictive of an underlying cancer in patients presenting with VTE. The present study is an ongoing prospective study with the primary aim to investigate the diagnostic potential of markers of inflammation, including markers of NETs, in detecting occult cancer in patients presenting with VTE. Secondary aims are to include other biomarkers of cancer, and to assess whether any or a combination of these biomarkers may be prognostic of occult cancer, recurrent thrombotic events, mortality, or cancer disease progression in VTE patients with an underlying malignancy.

The objective of this proposal is to develop and validate diagnostic and prognostic (including short-term and long-term prognoses) prediction models for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in China.

The proposed study will investigate the clinical use of the ISCDX test that may differentiate between diverse stroke etiologies as listed below: Aim 1: Differentiate between cardioembolic and large artery atherosclerotic ischemic strokes, when hemorrhagic stroke is ruled out, as defined by TOAST classification of subtypes of acute ischemic stroke. Aim 2: In cases of ischemic strokes of unknown or "cryptogenic" etiology, determine the ability of biomarker blood tests to predict etiology between cardioembolic and large artery atherosclerotic.

Patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE associated with persistent risk factors have a high risk of recurrence after stopping anticoagulation. In these patients, international guidelines recommend indefinite anticoagulation. However, prolonged use of warfarin or DOAC at therapeutic dose is associated with a significant risk of bleeding. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that extended anticoagulation at lower dosage might be as effective as and safer than full dose of anticoagulation. However, low-dose warfarin (INR 1.5-2) was less effective and not safer than conventional dose warfarin (INR 2-3). Low dose of DOAC has the potential to validate this hypothesis. In a first randomized trial comparing full-dose or low-dose apixaban with a placebo during an additional one year of anticoagulation in patients where physicians were uncertain for prolonging anticoagulation ("Amplify-extension trial"), low-dose apixaban was more effective than placebo without any major concern regarding safety and possibly as effective as and safer than full-dose apixaban; in a second randomized trial comparing full-dose or low-dose rivaroxaban with aspirin, during an additional one year of anticoagulation in patients where physicians were uncertain for prolonging anticoagulation ("Einstein-Choice trial"), low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective than aspirin without any major concern regarding safety and possibly as effective as and safer than full-dose rivaroxaban. However, these two studies were not designed and powered to demonstrate non-inferiority on efficacy and superiority on safety of a reduced dose of DOAC versus a full dose DOAC and the selected population did not have strong indications for indefinite anticoagulation. Thus, there is currently no evidence to recommend a reduced dose rather than a full dose of DOAC for extended therapy in patients at high risk of recurrent VTE. Consequently, a randomized trial comparing low-dose DOAC with full-dose DOAC therapy in patients at high risk of recurrent VTE is needed and justified. Main hypothesis: After VTE at high risk of recurrence initially treated during 6 (-15 days) to 24 (+ 3 months) uninterrupted months, a reduced dose of DOAC will be non-inferior to a full dose of DOAC in terms of recurrent VTE during extended anticoagulation phase.

The PREP and GO study is an international multicentre prospective cohort evaluating anticoagulation management strategies around labor and delivery and the postpartum period.