Active clinical trials for "Thromboembolism"

There is very little data available on compliance with self-injected low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), but what there is, definitely shows that compliance represents a significant problem. We therefore aim to a) record drug use problems of patients including compliance, b) develop a "SOP" for first instruction by a pharmacist and for subsequent pharmaceutical care and c) to compare intensive pharmaceutical care (intervention) vs. standard care (control) provided in the pharmacy to patients with a prescription for a LMWH as an outpatient treatment. Hypothesis: Intensive pharmaceutical care in ambulatory patients who self-inject low molecular weight heparins results in improved compliance, more safety and satisfaction as well as in fewer complications.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapeutic anticoagulation with tinzaparin during pregnancy via weight-based dosing.

RATIONALE: Warfarin may be effective in preventing the formation of blood clots in patients with central venous catheters. PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trial to study the effectiveness of warfarin in preventing blood clots in cancer patients who have central venous catheters.

Researchers are looking for a better way to prevent the formation of blood clots in people who have or have had: an irregular and often rapid heartbeat a blocked blood flow to the heart a blocked or reduced blood flow to a part of the brain. When a blood clot forms in the body in patients with the above conditions, it may block vessels of the heart, the brain and/or other parts of the body. This may lead to heart attack, stroke and other serious complications. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. This is a complex series of steps that must occur in a specific sequence. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. They work by interrupting one or more of the coagulation steps and are therefore known as anticoagulants. They decrease the risk of the above-mentioned complications. The study treatment asundexian works by blocking a very specific step in the blood clotting process, the activation of a protein called Factor XIa. Due to its very specific action that is not thought to be involved in the main blood clotting steps needed to stop bleeding (e.g. like from a cut finger), asundexian is expected to reduce the risk of bleeding that is still seen with existing anticoagulants. Since people who need an anticoagulant may also have liver problems, information on asundexian use in this group is needed. The main purpose of this study is to learn how asundexian moves into, through and out of the body in participants with a mild or moderate reduction in liver function compared to participants with normal liver function who are similar in age, weight, and gender. To answer this question, researchers will measure the average highest level of asundexian in the blood (also referred to as Cmax) the average total level of asundexian in the blood (also referred to as AUC). that were reached after intake of a single tablet of asundexian. The researchers will compare these data between participants with reduced liver function and matched participants with normal liver function to look for differences. Each participant will be in the study for up to 4 weeks. Participants will stay in-house for 6 days, starting the day before taking asundexian. In addition, two visits to the study site are planned. During the study, the doctors and their study team will: do physical examinations check vital signs take blood and urine samples examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of anticoagulation self-monitoring coupled with an educational intervention in a minority underserved population.

Over 100,000 VHA patients receive anticoagulants (blood thinners) each year to prevent blood clots (including strokes). Too much anticoagulation increases the risk of serious or even fatal bleeding, and too little anticoagulation fails to protect the patient against blood clots. VHA anticoagulation clinics vary widely on how much time their patients spend in the therapeutic range, the range within which they are protected from clots but not at excessive risk of bleeding. Anticoagulation clinics can improve anticoagulation control by following several relatively simple procedures, including following-up promptly when patients are out of range and focusing on educating and supporting patients with poor control. In this study, the investigators will promote these practices at the anticoagulation clinics of the New England VA region, with a goal of improving anticoagulation control.

This is a research study to compare the efficacy of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and pneumatic compression devices versus enoxaparin (also known as Lovenox) and pneumatic compression devices in preventing deep vein thrombosis in patients with pelvic and lower extremity malignant tumors and undergoing surgery. Pneumatic compression devices are also known as sequential compression devices and are inflatable compression sleeves that are placed around patient's legs to reduce the risk of clot formation deep vein thrombosis. Pneumatic compression devices are made of a soft material that wraps around the lower leg and periodically squeeze the calf. A deep vein thrombosis is a blood clot. Most hospitalized patients wear these as a preventive measure. Pneumatic compression devices alone are not sufficient to prevent deep vein thrombosis formation. Therefore, medicines, such as aspirin and enoxaparin are utilized. Both drugs are used for prevention, but there are no studies in patients with musculoskeletal tumors which have determined whether one drug is better than another. The knowledge gained from this study will determine whether aspirin and pneumatic compression devices is the same or better than enoxaparin and pneumatic compression devices in preventing deep vein thrombosis in this patient population and may result in fewer wound and bleeding complications

Rationale: The narrow therapeutic range and wide inter-patient variability in dose requirement make anticoagulation response to coumarin derivatives unpredictable. As a result, patients require frequent monitoring to avert adverse effects and maintain therapeutic efficacy. Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) and vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) jointly account for about 40% of the inter-individual variability in dose requirements. To date, several pharmacogenetic guided dosing algorithms for coumarin derivatives, predominately for warfarin, have been developed. However, the potential benefit of these dosing algorithms in terms of their safety and clinical utility has not been adequately investigated in randomised settings. Objective: To determine whether a dosing algorithm containing genetic information increases the time within therapeutic INR range during anticoagulation therapy with each of warfarin, acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon compared to a dosing regimen that does not contain this information. Secondary outcomes of the study include cost effectiveness, number of thromboembolic and bleeding events, time to reach stable dose and number of supratherapeutic INR peaks.

The purpose of this study is to find out whether rivaroxaban is safe and effective to use in children age newborn to less than 6 months and how long it stays in the body and how it is used in the body. Safety will be assessed by looking at the incidence and types of bleeding events. There will also be a check for worsening of blood clots.

AECOPD increases the risk of VTE.VTE prevention is a long way to go for high-risk VTE patients in China.The incidence of AECOPD complicated with VTE in Asian population is high and the mortality rate is high.Rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, has been widely used in the treatment and prevention of VTE.However the question about the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulant compared with LMWHs for the prevention of symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death post-hospital discharge in high-risk AECOPD patients is still unknown. Thus this study is to evaluate if the prophylactic anticoagulation effect by Rivaroxaban is non-inferiority than Enoxaprine in high risk AECOPD and to evaluate the safety of using Rivaroxaban to prevent VTE in high risk AECOPD comparing with Enoxaprine.