Active clinical trials for "Thrombophlebitis"

Рrospective single-centre randomized open-label study for comparison three modes of treatment for thrombosis of varicose great saphena vein - standard medical with fondaparinux sodium for 45 days, endovenous laser ablation close to the saphenofemoral junction with a 7-day course of anticoagulation and endovenous laser ablation close to the saphenofemoral junction without the use of anticoagulants.

Central venous catheters improve the tolerability and feasibility of patient care in the hospital setting by allowing the administration of hyper-osmotic, vesicant and venotoxic fluids. Despite these advantages, the long-term presence of central venous catheters is associated with thrombotic and infectious risks , including catheter-related bacteremia, which can be complicated by septic thrombophlebitis and endocarditis that can lead to death. Septic thrombophlebitis is a complication of venous catheter infections, which increases the morbidity. It is defined by the presence of a thrombosis in the vein where the venous catheter is located, associated with a bacteremia. A distinction is made between superficial and deep thrombophlebitis. The frequency of septic thrombophlebitis of venous catheters is variable and poorly described in the literature. When the diagnosis of septic thrombophlebitis is made, it is recommended to extend the duration of antibiotic therapy, to remove the infected catheter and to prescribe anticoagulant treatment. However, there is no recommendation on the duration of anticoagulation for septic thrombophlebitis, whether it is deep or superficial. Investigator proposes a prospective and descriptive interventional study to describe the ultrasound evolution of thrombus in patients with septic thrombophlebitis on central venous catheter and midline.

To evaluate fondaparinux 2.5mg subcutaneously once daily for 45 days in the treatment of acute (recent) superficial thrombophlebitis.

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that Fragmin (dalteparin sodium) subcutaneously once daily for 7 days is more effective than Ibuprofen given orally three times daily for 7 days for the treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis (STP).

Acute deep venous thrombosis (ADVT) of the lower extremity is a common disorder. Traditional treatment with anticoagulation therapy is effective in reducing the associated risk of pulmonary embolism, but is ineffective in restoring patency of the venous system of the lower extremity. While systemic thrombolytic therapy has been shown to be more effective than anticoagulation, catheter directed local thrombolytic therapy is the most effective treatment in restoring venous patency. Current treatment regimens are based on use of urokinase, infused continuously through catheters imbedded into the thrombus. These treatment regimens require doses on the order of 10,000,000 units of urokinase, resulting in significant bleeding complications and prohibitive costs. Experience at NIH with pulse-spray treatment of axillary subclavian venous thrombosis with rtPA indicates that this is a highly effective and safe alternative thrombolytic regimen. The proposed protocol is designed to evaluate the efficiency, safety, and doses of rtPA associated with pulse spray directed rtPA treatment of the more extensive venous thrombosis encountered in the lower extremity.

Evaluation efficacy and safety of Esarin Gel in subjects with chronic venous insufficiency or varicose veins combine superficial vein thrombophlebitis.

This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of topically administered diclofenac gel versus placebo with respect to the symptom score (pain, temperature and size of erythema along the superficial vein)

The aim of the study is to establish whether treatment of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) with low-molecular-weight heparin in preventive or therapeutic doses prevents disease progression and thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), whether efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin differs with regard to the dosage used (prevention, treatment), and to recognize groups of patients in which treatment with heparin is most efficient, as well as to determine factors that influence the efficacy of SVT treatment with heparin.

The optimal treatment of superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) is still uncertain. Though low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is considered the treatment of choice, studies conducted so far do not give clear indications of the optimal dose and duration of treatment. This study aims to evaluate whether an intermediate therapeutic dose of LMWH (parnaparin) is more effective than a prophylactic dose and also to assess whether 10 rather than 30 days are sufficient for treatment.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are central catheters that are placed via peripheral vein under ultrasound guidance and may be used for patients with difficult venous access for long-term central or peripheral infusion therapies as well as central venous pressure monitoring in a critical care setting. Although PICCs provide a great option for some patients, these catheters have known complications including catheter-related bloodstream infection, catheter-related venous thrombosis or clotting, malfunction, and high cost. Midline catheters represent a potentially attractive alternative to PICCs for peripheral infusions. As midlines have increased in popularity and new midlines have been introduced into the market, it is necessary to better understand complication profiles of various midline catheters, as it is likely that all catheters are not created equal. Specifically, the incidence of symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis is of interest. Some midline catheters are coated to provide protection against catheter-related venous thrombosis and/or catheter-related bloodstream infection. The theoretical benefit(s) of these catheters need further validation in human subjects.