Active clinical trials for "Seizures"

post-traumatic seizures (PTS) are a common and debilitating complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and could have harmful impact on patient disabilty and rehabilitation outcome. In this multicentric prospective observational study we aimed to evaluate the role on functional outcome of patients admitted to neurorehabilitation unit afther traumatic brain injury of: newly occurring seizures prescription of antiepileptic prophylactic therapy The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) age ≥ 18; 2) diagnosis of TBI on presentation; 3) admission to a hospital emergency department within 24 h of injury; 4) admission within one month from the injury to the rehabilitation unit to continue clinical care and rehabilitation program; 5) up to 6 months of observation in rehabilitation setting. Were collected the following variables: gender, medical history, age at occurrence of injury, injury characteristics, fracture site, presence of penetrating TBI, presence of subarachnoid haemorrhage, associated neurosurgical procedures (craniotomy, cranioplasty), neurologic and functional assessments, brain imaging, occurrence of seizure, presence and type of anticonvulsant therapy, death during hospitalization. The investigator analysed through logistic regression variables predictors of risk occurrence of seizure, and neurological and functional outcome, respectively assessed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

The purpose of this study is to design and test the safety and feasibility of virtual reality technologies and experiences of egocentric avatar embodiment in the application of physical and cognitive behavior therapy in functional neurological symptom/conversion disorder. Investigators hypothesize that patients will safely use and accept this modality of treatment and will show evidence of a decrease in symptom frequency.

The purpose of this study is to examine the long-term safety and tolerability of USL261 in the treatment of seizure clusters.

Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) are the main treatment for epilepsy; however, only a limited number of AEDs are approved for use as monotherapy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BRV in the conversion of partial onset seizure patients from combination treatment to monotherapy.

This study is intended to provide evidence that zonisamide is safe and effective in the treatment of myoclonic seizures. The total planned trial duration will be 6.5 months. After that, subjects who have completed the study will be eligible to enroll in an open-label extension study until zonisamide is marketed for this indication or further development in this indication stops. This extension study will be described in a separate protocol (E2090-E044-318).

The purpose of this research study is to compare the long term effectiveness, safety and tolerability of carisbamate compared to two other frequently prescribed anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical improvement by partial seizures reduction, safety and tolerability of subjects having partial epilepsy related to the adjunction of pregabalin BID (75 to 300mg day titration, BID) to existing standard AED (Antiepileptic drugs).

It is unclear how enteral nutrition via a feeding tube should be given when a patient is receiving enteral Dilantin. Some caregivers hold the feedings for one hour before and one hour after the Dilantin dose to insure adequate absorption of the medication and some caregivers think that the feedings do not need to be interrupted. Hypothesis: Dilantin levels will remain therapeutic when enteral nutrition is given continuously during the administration of enteral Dilantin. The objective of this study is to determine Dilantin levels when enteral feedings are given by the continuous method. Thirty patients will be studied. When Dilantin levels are in the therapeutic range for 2 consecutive days on interrupted feedings (baseline), the patient will be switched to continuous feedings uninterrupted for the medication, for 7 days. Dilantin levels will be checked daily and if the levels become subtherapeutic an intravenous (IV) bolus of Dilantin will be given and the enteral dose will be increased (doses determined by primary caregiver). Serum albumin will be measured at baseline and at the beginning and end of each week, in order to calculate free Dilantin.

After a thorough review of the existing literature as well as a review of our own practice, the investigators have concluded that the decision to treat patients undergoing aneurysm repair with levetiracetam has reached true clinical equipoise. In other words, the investigators cannot favor a decision to either administer or not administer this drug in these patients based on the existing information. The utility of anti-epileptic prophlaxis in the perioperative period for patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair remains a common practice that is not supported by the current literature that includes retrospective analyses as well as prospective trials for similar but not identical types of patients. The investigators propose to settle this dilemma by performing a prospective randomized trial in patients undergoing aneurysm repair in order to definitively determine if the common practice of perioperative antiepileptic drug administration has any utility. The study will be extended to June 2024 to allow for a 5 year follow up of the last enrolled patient in June, 2019.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of Brivaracetam and Phenytoin, both administered intravenously, in adult subjects experiencing nonconvulsive electrographic seizures.