Active clinical trials for "Craniocerebral Trauma"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell transplantation in the management of neurological sequelae after traumatic brain injury

Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (s-TBI) is a major cause of death and disability across all ages. Besides the primary impact, the pathophysiologic process of major secondary brain damage consists of a neuroinflammation response that critically leads to irreversible brain damage in the first days after the trauma. A key catalyst in this inflammatory process is the complement system. Inhibiting the complement system is therefore considered to be a potentially important new treatment for TBI, as has been shown in animal studies. This trial aims to study the safety and efficacy of C1-inhibitor compared to placebo in TBI patients. By temporarily blocking the complement system we hypothesize limitation of secondary brain injury and more favourable clinical outcome for TBI patients due to a decrease in the posttraumatic neuroinflammatory response.

The study will access the efficacy and safety of treatment with CITOFLAVIN® in patients with non-penetrating moderately severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study recruits patients 18-60 years with TBI, corresponding to the clinical diagnosis of brain contusion, with GCS score 9 -14 at the time of inclusion , with the estimated time of initiation of therapy within 24 hours from the estimated or established time of trauma, with post-traumatic amnesia, confusion or disorientation and absence of indications for neurosurgery or other surgical intervention under general anesthesia. Cytoflavin® (Inosine + Nicotinamide + Riboflavin + Succinic Acid) is a combination drug, which improves cerebral blood flow, activates metabolic processes in the central nervous system, restores impaired consciousness, promotes regression of neurological symptoms and improvement of cognitive functions of the brain.

This study has two main goals: 1) to refine and enhance the R2R-TBI intervention; and 2) to examine the efficacy of the R2R-TBI intervention in a randomized control trial. To achieve the second goal, we will employ a between-groups randomized treatment design with repeated measures at baseline, one-month post-randomization, and at a six-month follow-up. The two conditions will be: a) usual medical care plus access to internet resources regarding pediatric brain injury (Internet Resources Comparison group, IRC), and b) usual medical care plus the R2R-TBI intervention (Road-to-Recovery group, R2R-TBI).

The purpose of this small, research study is to examine effectiveness of an at-home application of an experimental intervention, on thinking and memory in mild-moderate, closed-head, traumatic brain injury cases. The experimental intervention is light-emitting diode (LED) therapy, which is applied to the scalp and through the nose using a head frame device. Participants are expected to complete two, 5-week series of LED treatments, at home, 3 times a week. There will be a 1-month period between the two series. Each home treatment is 20 minutes. Participants will be trained to use the head frame device, in-office. The head frame device falls within the FDA category General Wellness, low-risk devices, and no medical claims are made. A two-hour paper and pencil testing (4 visits) and a one-hour MRI (3 visits) will be administered before and after each treatment series. Participants may be in the study for about 4 months. This study is supported by Vielight, Inc., Hayward, CA/ Toronto, Canada

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two models of delivery of guided exercise in patients with exercise intolerance after mild head injury. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is a program that includes elements of in-house exercise and follow-up sessions, and repeated treadmill testing, superior to a program with telephone-based follow-up only? Participants will undergo a treadmill test to determine eligibility for the study, and to determine at what intensity level their symptoms worsen (symptom threshold). Thereafter they will exercise 15-20 minutes, 3-5 times per week at 80-90% of the heart rate that was found to be the symptom threshold. One group will receive face-to-face folllow-up and repeated testing, one group will receive telephone-based follow-up only . Researchers will compare these two groups to see if closer follow-up is superior when it comes to recovery from exercise intolerance after 12 weeks of exercise.

The progression of brain lesions after severe head trauma or subarachnoid hemorrhage results from extra cranial aggression which is well controlled in intensive care and intracranial aggression which is less well known and therefore less well managed. The detection of events that can generate new lesions from intracranial monitoring is limited and late once the lesions are irreversible. Invasive cortical depolarizations (SD) can be observed using cortical electrodes and an acquisition system having access to the usually filtered DC signal (0 to 1 Hz). SD are observed at the onset of a new attack of the cortex and spread widely away from the site of aggression. During their propagation, SD generate a significant metabolic demand, and can cause ischemic injury, particularly after meningeal or post-traumatic hemorrhage. SDs are therefore both a marker of new lesion and a mechanism of progression of primary lesions. Yet this type of monitoring is only performed in some expert centers around the world. The analysis of the feasibility and safety of the placement of cortical electrodes in this indication is therefore an essential step to study the clinical benefit of individualized management on the basis of this monitoring.

Patients who have suffered moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently develop behavioural changes, which can have deleterious consequences on interpersonal relationships, social, family and professional reintegration. They are a source of difficulties (burden) for family and friends. Social cognition covers four functions: recognition of social cues; empathy; attribution of intentions to a third party, or theory of mind; and adjustment of social behaviour according to context. This study has two parts: 1/ Evaluation, using a cognitive approach, of the different components of social cognition after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, and of its repercussions in daily life and on family and friends. 2/ Creation of a specific re-education method for the different modules of social cognition and study of its effectiveness.

This three-year study will determine the effectiveness of a helmetless tackling training intervention to decrease head impact exposure in Hawaiian high school football players.

Two middle school (ages 11-14) football teams will be in Aim 1 of this study. All interested athletes on these teams will be invited to voluntarily participate in biomechanical data collection; of those enrolled, 15-20 per team will be randomly selected for instrumentation with head impact sensors. In aim 3, two youth football teams at the middle school level will be recruited to pilot an intervention developed this study. The football coaches of each team will be prospectively recruited and enrolled. All interested athletes on these teams will be enrolled; of those enrolled, 15-20 per team will be randomly selected for instrumentation with head impact sensors. Baseline and post-season neurocognitive data will be collected.