Active clinical trials for "Wounds and Injuries"

This study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in the prevention and management of neonatal extravasation injury, and to examine the change in nurses' knowledge of and adherence to the guideline.

The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and the safety of polyene phosphatidylcholine Injection in patients with acute drug-induced liver injury after 2-4 weeks of treatment.

Chronic wounds are common and carry out an important and often neglected burden not only to the individual, the family but also to the society as a whole. The therapeutic approach to the management of chronic wounds include wound bed preparation or wound dressing management. Wound bed preparation is a concept emphasizing a holistic and systematic approach to evaluate and remove barriers to the healing process to allow the wound healing process to progress normally. Debridement is an integrated part of wound bed preparation, achieving certain goals and, thus, creating a healthy wound bed, margins and peri-wound skin with the objective to promote and accelerate healing. Debridement is defined as the removal of foreign material and necrotic tissue from a wound and it can also help to stimulate wound healing. However, not all methods of debridement are the same. Each method has advantages and disadvantages that must be clearly understood. In the present clinical practice, there are several methods of wound debridement: autolytic, enzymatic, mechanical, surgical (sharp) and biologic. The most common method is the mechanical debridement. Currently a micro-water jet technique was introduced into clinical practice. The micro-water jet technique Debritom+ is an effective alternative to traditional instrument interventions performed with the scalpel and/or curette. A sterile liquid is expelled from a nozzle at a selected intensity and accurately sprayed onto the wound surface. The desired effect is the generation of targeted micro-bleedings to stimulate regeneration and healing processes while preserving the underlying healthy tissue. Today, there is no clinical evidence quantitatively comparing one debridement method over the other. Therefore the invesitgators propose a pilot study to measure the extent of tissue loss after debridement using Debritom+ micro-water jet technology versus traditional instrument debridement procedure using scalpel and curette.

This study was conducted to assess the postoperative painscores in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair between two groups receiving either U/S guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerves block with Ropivacaine or wound infiltration with Ropivacaine.The safety of two analgesic interventions(ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerves blocks and wound infiltration) was measured alongwith comparison of opioid use between the two groups over 24 hours postoperatively was made. Patient satisfaction between the two groups was also assessed by the Likert scale.

The study aims to investigate acute effects of ballistic hamstring stretching, hamstring extender exercise, and kinesiotaping application on viscoelasticity of hamstrings and standing long jump performance on rowers.

This study will investigate the effects of an exercise intervention on retired American professional football (APF) players. A total of 20 retired APF players (≥ 18 years of age), who suffer from chronic pain, will be enrolled. The study duration for each participants will be 18 months. Enrolled participants will perform a 18 months exercise intervention which involves 90 exercise rehabilitation training visits. In addition, participants will also be tested on various measures of health and function both at baseline (prior to intervention), at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months (post intervention). All testing and result interpretation will be performed by trained research personnel. Participants are not University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) participants; however, study testing visits will occur at UIC. All exercise intervention training visits will occur at Gh Fitlab.

In our society spinal cord injury is a major problem.activity based therapy and conventional therapy has a potentional to improve upper limb strength and transfer in tetraplegic patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of activity based therapy versus conventional therapy to improve the upper limb strength and transfer in spinal cord injury. The study design used was randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted at the paraplegic center Peshawar in 6 weeks after the approval of synopsis. A sample size of 16 participants was taken with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury received using lottery method. Subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A was treated with activity based therapy + baseline therapy and group B was treated with conventional therapy + baseline therapy. 8 subjects in each group. Pre and post treatment evaluation were done by using Spinal cord independence measure scale (SCIM) and International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury upper extremity measurement scale (ISNCSCI- UEMS). Post spinal cord independence measure activity based group mean 26.87±12.87 and conventional group mean 31.50±23.82. The results indicate that conventional therapy and activity based therapy both are helpful in improving upper limb strength and transfer total spinal cord independence measure pre sig.0.96 and post sig.0.57. Both activity based therapy and conventional therapy equally effective for improving the upper limb strength and transfer in spinal cord injury. entional therapy.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not giving a lower dose of antibiotics (Vancomycin) in the area where it is needed (upper extremity) is more effective at preventing infection than the current standard dose which is given intravenously (IV).

Up to 28% of undergraduate college students report a suspected history of traumatic brain injury. Following traumatic brain injury, college students fail and repeat more courses and have lower grade point averages. Further complicating this problem may be the fact that college students lack knowledge of traumatic brain injury definition, its associated symptoms, and individuals involved in post-injury management. In this project, the investigators propose to compare the use of an established treatment model (i.e., the Dynamic Coaching Model) to a novel protocol (i.e., the Apprenticeship Approach) that includes explicit instruction about traumatic brain injury in college students with this population. The investigators will use a group comparison design to examine the efficacy of this instructional component. This work incorporates findings from educational psychology and speech-language pathology (e.g., the included instructional materials adhere to the principles of adult learning). As such, this work will advance the field's basic understanding of currently recommended treatment components and will systematically examine the effects of incorporating explicit instruction into an existing treatment model.

Acute limb injury is a common reason to visit an emergency department worldwide. Intense pain related to the injury is always a concern for an emergency physician and requires effective analgesia within the shortest possible time. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids and paracetamol are the commonly used drugs in an emergency department. The choice of analgesia should be established by its efficacy, logistics involved and route of administration. There is good evidence about NSAIDs being the first line analgesia and paracetamol is reported to have the narcotic sparing effect, either alone or as an adjunctive treatment in different settings. The synergistic effect of paracetamol with diclofenac in acute limb injuries related pain management lacks good- quality evidence. Therefore investigators proposed a large, well designed, randomized double-blind trial to develop high-quality evidence. The study aims to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in addition to diclofenac, and compare the difference between oral and intravenous paracetamol administration in acute limb injuries in the emergency department.