Effects of ART® on Lower Limb Myofascial Pain and Function
Muscle InjuryLower Limb InjuryThis is a feasibility study to determine if the investigators can conduct a clinical trial with a sham and control soft tissue treatment. The primary research questions are can the investigators provide the treatments as specified, can they recruit a sufficient number of participants, and does ART® decrease pain and improve function in 20-50 year-old adults with subacute or chronic lower limb soft-tissue injuries compared to a sham treatment? This is a pre-post ART® pilot study with a control group that would receive a sham ART® treatment. The study group is 20-50 year-old adults with subacute or chronic lower limb soft tissue injuries.
Augmented Reality and Treadmill Training After Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain InjuryUp to 40 participants will be enrolled in this study in order to obtain complete data on 30 participants. The investigators will be assessing if Augmented reality in combination with treadmill training is safe and feasible to use in the clinical environment with participants who have chronic TBI and if there is a signal of effect that this intervention may be more beneficial than treadmill training alone or standard of care.
Remediation of Emotional Deficits in Multiple Sclerosis and Traumatic Brain Injury
Multiple SclerosisTraumatic Brain InjuryThis study will examine the efficacy of a clinical intervention for improving emotional processing in individuals with MS and TBI.(1)The main outcome measure will be changes in emotional processing measures from pre to post treatment. (2)This study will also assess the impact of the emotional processing intervention on changes in pre and post treatment depression and anxiety, as well as fatigue.(3) This study will additionally measure the impact of the emotional processing intervention on cognitive functioning, specifically processing speed, attention and executive abilities. This will be accomplished through the completion of a neuropsychological battery prior to and following the completion of treatment.(4)Finally, the investigators will measure the impact of the intervention on quality of life and social functioning, utilizing a pre and post treatment assessment consisting of measures of self-efficacy, quality of life, functional abilities, and awareness.
LSALT Peptide vs. Placebo to Prevent ARDS and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2...
COVIDSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome3 moreTo evaluate the proportion of subjects alive and free of respiratory failure (e.g. need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, high flow oxygen, or ECMO) and free of the need for continued renal replacement therapy (RRT) on Day 28. The need for continued RRT at Day 28 will be defined as either dialysis in the past 3 days (Day 26, 27, or 28) or an eGFR on Day 28 <10 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Use of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Following ACL Tear
Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearKnee Injuries1 moreEvaluating the use of peri-operative blood flow restriction therapy surrounding anterior cruciate ligament tear
Procellera® Compared to Standard of Care Treatment in Mitigating Biofilm Formation in Acute Trauma...
Trauma-related WoundBurn1 moreThe objective of the study is to evaluate Procellera® , a novel FDA approved antimicrobial wound dressing in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. The hypothesis is that when the dressing is moistened, the low electric field created by moisture-activated elemental silver and zinc electro-couple will prevent formation of biofilm in wounds or to disrupt existing biofilm.
Ketamine for Acute Pain Management After Trauma
Trauma InjuryPain1 moreThe purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Ketamine drip along with usual care and usual care alone on trauma patients and to longitudinally quantify the pain experience of patients during hospitalization.
Spinal Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord InjuriesElectrical spinal stimulation combined with activity-based rehabilitation (ABR) can improve motor and autonomic function in individuals suffering from varying degrees of paralysis. Spinal stimulation studies have included invasive implanted devices and non-invasive transcutaneous systems using different combinations of stimulation current, waveform, amplitude, duration and spinal levels targeted. Invasive and non-invasive systems have been demonstrated to permit individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), previously considered to have complete injuries on the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (ISNCSCI) scale (Classification A), to regain some degree of voluntary and autonomic function during periods of stimulation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a novel non-invasive transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation system (tSCS) combined with activity-based rehabilitation in patients who have paralysis of their legs and/or arms. We will examine participants for any changes in sensory, motor or autonomic function. We will use a transcutaneous spinal cord stimulator that has been designed to deliver safe and tolerable bursts of high frequency pulsed current that minimise the capacitance efforts of the skin surface and maximise conductance of a second waveform using low frequency current to target neural structures. We aim to investigate this form of neuromodulation with a small group of individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Our goal is to observe and describe any short term or lasting changes in function that can safely and comfortably be derived from this combination of spinal stimulation and activity-based rehabilitation. If this therapy can cause lasting improvements in sensory, motor, respiratory or autonomic function, then this may lead to a greater degree of functional independence for these individuals.
Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
Chronic WoundsAcute WoundsThe study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial designed to compare the ability of NaOCl to NSS in the reduction of bacterial burden in nonhealing acute and chronic wounds.
Is Aminophylline More Effective Than Neostigmine/Atropine Mixture in the Treatment of Post-dural...
Post-Dural Puncture HeadacheObjectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of IV aminophylline versus IV neostigmine/atropine mixture in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Background: PDPH is the most frequent complication of procedures associated with dural puncture for spinal anesthesia or following accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. Since invasive treatments have known complications, pharmacologic management may be preferable. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase four clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients presented with PDPH at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each); group A, received IV aminophylline, and group NA, received IV neostigmine/atropine mixture.