Active clinical trials for "Wounds and Injuries"

PREDICT II is an observational, prospective design, single-center study aiming to determine whether the prognosis of neurological outcome at 6 months in patients undergoing traumatic brain injury established by a doctor at his initial management is more accurate in experienced doctors versus junior doctors.

The objective of this study is to identify home safety hazards for adolescents with acquired brain injury and to identify adaptations to the home healthcare virtual simulation training system (HH-VSTS) to improve the user experience for adolescents with ABI

A Randomized controlled trail to To assess the efficacy of povidone-iodine wash before wound closure in preventing surgical site infections.

In this study, the demographic and clinical characteristics of trauma patients followed up in the Intensive Care Unit of the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic of the Health Sciences University Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital for a 2-year period were evaluated prospectively to determine the morbidity and mortality rates and to determine the factors affecting these rates. data.

This is a pilot study to identify biomarkers that individually, and in combination, demonstrate the greatest sensitivity to repetitive, low-level blast exposure (RLLBE) neurotrauma in Special Operations Forces (SOF) personnel. The proposed cross-sectional, multimodal study will elucidate the potential effects of long-term RLLBE by comparing biomarkers across subjects.

Acquired brain injury is a general term including trauma due to head injury or postsurgical damage, vascular accident such as stroke or subarachnoid hemorrhage, toxic or metabolic cause such as hypoglycemia, cerebral anoxia, and infection or inflammation. However acquired brain injury leaves survivors with a considerable burden of physical, cognitive, emotional,behavioural and psychosocial limitations,these individuals often require healthcare, supervision, and support from professional or informal caregivers in some or all of their lives. Therefore, this study have two primary aims: (1) to conclude the level of caregiver's life satisfaction and strain; and (2) to determine the factors predicting strain among the caregivers. İnvestigators believe this study can add to the literature and create awareness on the current state of caregiver's well-being in this part of the world.

The aim of this research is to evaluate the diagnostic concordance of ultra low-dose and standard dose reconstructed computed tomography acquisitions using the ADMIRE algorithm to search for intracranial lesions - both hemorrhagic and bone lesions - in trauma patients at the emergency department. The study will also evaluate the diagnostic performance of the two protocols, as well as the speed of image reading. For the first time, acquisitions ≤ 10 mGy (lower value than reported in the literature) will be performed with top-of-the-range scanners available in the emergency room to search for intracranial lesions. These scanners are equipped with the latest generation of ADMIRE iterative algorithms.

To better depict the full range of spasticity after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) there is a need to take into account the patients perspective and their experiences during daily life. In 2007 the Spinal Cord Injury-Spasticity Evaluation Tool (SCI-SET) was created and validated. This specific questionnaire addresses the influence of spasticity on the daily life of SCI patients and takes into account negative as well as positive effects of spasticity to fulfill certain tasks. Until now this questionnaire is only available in english, turkish and persian language. Therefore, the investigators translated and culturally adapted this questionnaire and within this study this questionnaire shall be validated in a small cohort of SCI patients. The patients will fill in several different questionnaires at a first meeting and one week later the SCI-SETde questionnaire again to evaluate test-retest properties. Recruiting will happen completely at the Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil, Switzerland.

The aim of this prospective study is to analyze the postoperative paresthesias experienced in patients who undergo bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) using an ultrasonic saw, versus a reciprocating saw. Patients included in the study are ages 15-45 scheduled to undergo BSSO surgery at the University of California, San Francisco. One side of the patient's mandible will be instrumented with either the Stryker Sonopet ultrasonic saw or traditional reciprocating saw, while the other side will receive the remaining intervention (determined via randomization on the day of surgery). Patient paresthesias will then be analyzed on each side for 3 months postoperatively (at postoperative days: 1, 7, 14, 28, and 84). Sensory examinations will be carried out by blinded examiners using von Frey hairs and two point discrimination testing. Patients will also subjectively rate their sensation on each side. The results will then be analyzed to determine if patient paresthesias, including the severity and duration, differed depending on which instrument was used, the ultrasonic or reciprocating saw.

In patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI), the study's purpose was to determinate factors associated with mortality and poor functional outcome at 3 months in patients aged ≥ 65 hospitalized in ICU and to compare outcome at 3 months between younger patients (18-64 years) vs older patients (≥65 years). Traumatic brain injury is a common cause of hospitalization for trauma and accounting for roughly 37% of all injury-related death in Europe. This was particularly true for patients ≥ 65 years old and in the most severe case(Glasgow coma score ≤ 8) with mortality rates between 31 to 51%. Over time, epidemiological patterns of TBI are changing. Indeed, in high-income countries, overall incidence is steadily decreasing, but increasing in elderly population with falls becoming the leading cause of TBI. In parallel, the World Population Ageing 2019 report of the Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs reported 703 (9%) million persons aged ≥65 years in the global population and that this proportion is projected to rise further to 16 % in 2050. Accordingly, we could expect that TBI in elderly would be increasing and could explain why mortality did not improved in the latest decades. In a study performed in three neuro-intensive care unit (ICUs) from 1997 to 2007, 6-month mortality in patients aged of 70-79 and ≥ 80 years was 59% and 79%, respectively. In severe elderly (≥ 65 years) TBI patients admitted in ICU, hospital and 6-month mortality was 64.6% and 72.9%, respectively. Beyond mortality, TBI can lead to poor functional neurologic outcome and elderly patients are more prone to survive with disabilities according to a higher rate of comorbidities, frequent use of oral anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet and/or previous brain disorders. In patients hospitalized in ICU, age (> 59 years) was the strongest parameter associated with an unfavorable outcome including death, vegetative state and severe disability, at 6 month. Moreover, TBI elderly patients (≥ 65 years) had worse functional outcome at discharge than younger patients. Identifying elderly patients who may benefit from ICU remained challenging, since there is no consensual guideline of triage. Traumatic brain-injured patients are particularly concerned by this issue. Nevertheless, few data are available related to outcome in elderly TBI patients requiring ICU.